Case law

Kline v. N.C. D.O.T.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 17, 2003

. § 143B-346 ; Equipment Co. v. Hertz Corp. and Contractors, Inc. v. Hertz Corp., 256 N.C. 277 , 123 S.E.2d 802 (1962). … See Guyton v. Board of Transportation, 30 N.C. App. 87 , 226 S.E.2d 175 (1976).

Jaudon v. White

60 Misc. 2d 86 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jun 6, 1969

(Watkins v. Brown, 89 App. Div. 193 ; Matter of Vitelli, 146 Misc. 17 ), and this rule is vaguely based upon the husband’s obligation to support his wife, and public sentiment (Patterson v. Patterson, 59 N. Y. 574 ). … The preponderance of cases in this State do not fasten a reciprocal liability upon a wife unless the estate is incapable of paying the cost of burial (Rutecki v. Lukaszewski, 273 App. Div. 638 ; Apostle v.

Butler, Larry v. AAA Cooper Transportation

2017 TN WC App. 52 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Sep 12, 2017

Co. v. Campbell, No. M2015-01478-SC-R3-WC, 2016 Tenn. LEXIS 907, at *18 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. … See Seiber v. Reeves Logging, 284 S.W.3d 294, 298 (Tenn. 2009); Hadzic v. Averitt Express, No. 2014-02- 0064, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App Bd. LEXIS 14, at *9 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd.

Village of Canajoharie v. State

13 Misc. 2d 293 · New York Court of Claims · Jun 11, 1958

A resolution of the Village Board of Trustees was not produced and the deeds to the village do not recite that the acquisition was for park or other particular or limited purposes. … Mayor etc. of New York, 10 Barb. 223, 244, 245 ; Knapp v. Fasbender, 1 N Y 2d 212, 226; Proprietors of Mt. Hope Cemetery v. City of Boston, 158 Mass. 509 ; 1951 Atty. Gen. 129).

Marzette, Shelton v. Pat Salmon and Sons, Inc.

2015 TN WC App. 30 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Sep 18, 2015

The record was submitted to the Clerk of the Appeals Board on August 9, 2015. … Employer relies on Dorsey v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 2015-001-0017, 2015 Tenn. LEXIS 13 (TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. May 14, 20 15), to support its position that the trial court erred by ordering a new panel.

McCaffery, James v. Cardinal Logistics

2016 TN WC 196 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 7, 2016

Cardinal further relied on the Appeals Board opinion Tolbert v. MPW Industries Services, Inc., No. 2015-01-0199, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 1, at *6, 7 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. … McGee v. Best, 106 S.W.3d 48, 64 (Tenn. Ct.

Opinion No. (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 4, 1990

OUTSIDE OF OKLAHOMA TO THE EXTENT AN OKLAHOMA CAPITAL INVESTMENT BOARD GUARANTEED FUND OR PORTFOLIO ATTRACTS AT LEAST MATCHING CO-INVESTMENT IN OKLAHOMA BUSINESSES OR PROJECTS. 74 O.S. 5061 .8 (1990). … IN FINDING THE ACT DID NOT VIOLATE THIS PROVISION, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL NOTED THAT PURSUANT TO WAY V.

Early v. Early

5 Redf. 376 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 15, 1882

In Doe v. … In Brown v.

King v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 20, 2008

. § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Bolkir v. N.C. State University , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 3.

Justus, Joseph v. Blalock & Sons, Inc.

2020 TN WC 70 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 6, 2020

See McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Borough of Glen Ridge v. City of East Orange

19 N.J. Misc. 140 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 18, 1941

Board of Education of the City of Woodbury v. Township of West Deptford, New Jersey Tax Reports, 1934-1939, p. 598. … Bor the reasons stated, the assessment was without legal basis and the judgment of the Essex County Board is affirmed.

Bunch v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 16, 2009

. § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Braswell v. N.C. A T University , 5 N.C. App. 1 , 168 S.E.2d 24 (1969); Jenkins v. Department of Motor Veh. , 244 N.C, 560 , 94 S.E.2d 577 (1956). 4.

Pollock v. Waspco

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Oct 2, 2000

Huitz in June, 1996 and, on July 1, 1996, plaintiff began working for Thomas Brown at $12.00 per hour. This rate was greater than his pre-injury wage. 11. … Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co. , 305 N.C. 593 , 290 S.E.2d 682 (1982), Watkins v. Central Motor Lines , 279 N.C. 132 , 181 S.E.2d 588 (1971). 3.

Sigma Phi Epsilon v. City of Hoboken

1 N.J. Tax 607 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 12, 1980

Princeton University Press v. Princeton, 35 N.J. 209 , 172 A.2d 420 (1961); Bloomfield v. … NRA Special Contribution Fund v. Board of County Commissioners, 92 N.M. 541 , 591 P.2d 672 (Court of Appeals 1978), cert, denied 92 N.M. 464 , 589 P.2d 1055 (Sup.Ct. 1979).

Fortune v. N.C. D.O.C.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 4, 2004

Gammons v. North Carolina Dept. of Human Resources , 344 N.C. 51 , 472 S.E.2d 722 (1996). 2. … Hull v. Oldham , 104 N.C. App. 29 , 407 S.E.2d 611 (1991). 4.

Indiana MHC, LLC v. Scott County Assessor

987 N.E.2d 1182 · Indiana Tax Court · May 3, 2013

STANDARD OF REVIEW A taxpayer seeking to overturn an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. *1185 Osolo Twp. Assessor v. Elkhart Maple Lane Assocs., 789 N.E.2d 109, 111 (Ind. … Hometowne Assocs., L.P. v. Maley, 839 N.E.2d 269, 275 (Ind. Tax Ct.2005) (citation omitted)(emphasis added).

Melvin v. Dept. of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jan 17, 2007

The Industrial Commission has jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. N.C. Gen. … Taylor v. North Carolina Department of Correction , 88 N.C. App. 446 , 451 , 363 S.E.2d 868 , 87l (1988) (quoting Williams v. Adams , 288 N.C. 501 , 504 , 219 S.E.2d 198 , 200 ) (1975).

Palmer, Norman v. Hardy

2017 TN WC App. 18 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Feb 23, 2017

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Norman Palmer ) Docket No. 2016-02-0026 ) v. … Kimbrough v. Union Planters Nat’l Bank, 764 S.W.2d 203 (Tenn. 1989); Thomas v. Clinton, 607 F.

Laight Cooperative Corp. v. Kenny

105 Misc. 2d 1001 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jul 14, 1980

Corp. v Edwards, 133 Misc 831 ; Esplanade Gardens v Reed, NYLJ, May 9, 1979, p 13, col 3; Brigham Park Co-op. Apts. v Lieberman, 158 NYS2d 135 ; see Susskind v 1136 Tenants Corp., 43 Misc 2d 588 ).” … An examination of the relationships in a housing co-operative reveals that a minority shareholder is often as powerless against the board of directors as any tenant vis-á-vis a landlord.

Opinion No. (2001)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 14, 2001

Stemmons, Inc. v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp., 301 P.2d 212 , 216 (Okla. 1956). … Oliver v.