Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.69s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 27, 1992
OF ELEMENTARY AND INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTS, BOARDS OF REGENTS, BOARDS OF CONTROL OR ANY OTHER AGENCY OF AND WITHIN THE STATE BY WHICH A PERSON MAY BE EMPLOYED FOR SERVICE IN PUBLIC EDUCATION." … WOODY V. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 141 OF POTTAWATOMIE COUNTY, 661 P.2D 892 (OKLA.1983).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 12, 1989
Humphrey v. Denney, 757 P.2d 833 (Okla. 1988); Fuller v. Odom, 741 P.2d 449 (Okla. 1987). … Cavett v. Geary Board of Education, 587 P.2d 991 (Okla. 1978).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCullum, Paulette v. K-Mac Holding Corp d/b/a Taco Bell
2014 TN WC App. 7 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 23, 2014
Clay County Manor, Inc. v. State of Tennessee, 849 S.W.2d 755, 759 (Tenn. 1993) (quoting Southern Railway Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 682 S.W.2d 196, 199 (Tenn. 1984)). … Davidson, III Presiding Judge Workers' Compensation Appeals Board 7
Cited 0 timesPublishedWashington v. Central State University
92 Ohio Misc. 2d 26 · Ohio Court of Claims · Apr 24, 1998
See Kirsch v. Bowling Green State Univ. (May 30, 1996), Franklin App. … Watson v. Kent State Univ. (Aug. 8, 1994), Ct. of Cl. No. 91-06627, unreported; Dodson v. Wright State Univ. (1997), 91 Ohio Misc.2d 57 , 697 N.E.2d 287 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedJones v. N.C. Dept. of Correction
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 13, 2007
. § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Bolkir v. N.C. State University , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 3.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGrissom, Benjamin v. AT&T Services, Inc.
2022 TN WC 45 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 1, 2022
Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2021); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJohnston, Johnny v. Siskin Steel & Supply Co./Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
2019 TN WC 173 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 4, 2019
In Richardson v. … However, in Pool v. Jarman D & Q Transport, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.
Cited 0 timesPublished15 Or. Tax 305 · Oregon Tax Court · Feb 21, 2001
In light of that error, taxpayers appealed the assessed value of their property to the board of property tax appeals. … Ellis v. Lorati, 14 OTR 525 (1999). Taxpayers contend that the constitutional prohibition is not applicable to clerical errors correctable under ORS 311.205.
Cited 5 timesPublishedWoodard, Denny v. Freeman Expositions, LLC
2021 TN WC App. 65 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 16, 2021
See Simpson v. Satterfield, 564 S.W.2d 953, 955 (Tenn. 1978). … In reaching our decision, we cited Carter v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNewman v. Greater Columbus Arts Council
2025 Ohio 734 · Ohio Court of Claims · Feb 18, 2025
Viola v. … Cordell v. Paden, 2019- Ohio-1216, ¶ 8. See Cross v.
Cited 0 timesPublished6 S.W.2d 91 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 16, 1928
W. 401 ; State v. Dunson, 71 Tex. 65 , 9 S. W. 103 ; Cohen v. City of Houston (Tex. Civ. App.) 176 S. W. 809 ; Cohen v. City of Houston (Tex. Civ. App.) 205 S. W. 757 ; City of Carthage v. Burton, 51 Tex. Civ. … W. 440 ; Railway v. Bratcher, 54 Tex. Civ. App. 10 , 118 S. W. 1091 ; Short v. Gouger (Tex. Civ. App.) 130 S. W. 267 ; Parker v. Harris County Drainage District, No. 2 (Tex. Civ. App.) 148 S. W. 351 ; State v.
Cited 57 timesPublishedHarrison, Elizabeth v. Chattanooga Staffing
2019 TN WC 94 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 10, 2019
Lasser v. Waste Mgmt., Inc., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 20, at *14 (may 24, 2018). Here, Ms. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEmily Towers Owners Corp. v. Carleton Emily Towers, L.P.
170 Misc. 2d 82 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Oct 21, 1996
Corp. v Kelly, 124 Misc 2d 870, 873 , affd 108 AD2d 1107 , mod on other grounds sub nom. Fe Bland v Two Trees Mgt. Co., 66 NY2d 556 ). … Pursuant to section 18.3 (v) (5) (iii), if the conversion plan is a noneviction plan, the sponsor may exercise veto power for no more than five years over board resolutions regarding expenses.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of Starbuck
129 Misc. 460 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 27, 1927
(Calahan v. Mayor, 34 App. Div. 344 ; Ehrlich v. Chevra, etc., 86 N. Y. Supp. 820 .) … (Bank of Attica v. Manufacturers & Traders Bank, 20 N. Y. 501 ; Driscoll v. West Bradley & C. M. Co., 59 id. 96; Union Bank v. U. S. Exchange Bank, 143 App. Div. 128 .)
Cited 2 timesPublishedGulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Conley
252 S.W. 737 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 30, 1923
. * * * ” In the case of Railway v. Halloren, 53 Tex. 53 , 37 Am. … In the case of Railway v. Welch, 86 Tex. 203 , 24 S. W. 390 , 40 Am. St.
Cited 8 timesPublishedDickerson, Gary v. Dominion Development Group, LLC
2024 TN WC App. 6 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Mar 5, 2024
Cloyd v. Hartco Flooring Co., 274 S.W.3d 638, 643 (Tenn. 2008) (citing Orman v. Williams Sonoma, 803 S.W.2d 672, 676 (Tenn. 1991)). … See, e.g., Fink v. Caudle, 856 S.W.2d 952, 958 (Tenn. 1993); Carmichael v. J. C. Mahon Motor Co., 11 S.W.2d 672, 673 (Tenn. 1928).
Cited 0 timesPublished11 Fla. Supp. 2d 193 · State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings · Feb 20, 1985
After a review of an application and hearing thereon if the board finds as a fact that the proposed use is consistent with the intent of the land use plan and zoning ordinance and with the public interest, the board may permit … Oldham v. Peterson, 398 So.2d 875 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Rural New Town, Inc. v. Palm Beach County, 315 So.2d 438 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).
Cited 0 timesPublished1 Armstrong. Election Cases 422 · New York State Assembly · Jan 7, 1868
The certificate thus rejected by the board of county canvassers stated that William C. H. Sherman received two hundred and thirteen votes, and that George K. … In the case of Clausen v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMatrix Bordentown, Lot 2, LLC v. Director, Division of Taxation
New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 25, 2025
In Brill v. Guardian Life Ins. … Ridgewood Commons Group v. Dir., Div. of Taxation, 25 N.J. Tax 188, 195 (Tax 2009). In Metromedia, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMultnomah County v. Department of Revenue
8 Or. Tax 422 · Oregon Tax Court · Oct 13, 1980
It further states that the Board of County Commissioners shall prescribe the functions of such administrative departments of the county and that the board, by majority vote, may change the functions of any of the departments … As this court wrote in Dept. of Rev. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna