Opinion

Opinion No. (1989)

Court
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Filed
Sep 12, 1989
Status
Published
On the bench
ROBERT H. HENRY, Attorney General of Oklahoma
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 43.7%

The opinion

Dear Executive Director Hollander,

¶ 0 The Attorney General has received your letter asking for an official opinion addressing, in effect, the following question:

May a retired firefighter who is receiving benefits from the Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System serve in any capacity for compensation in a municipal fire department in the State of Oklahoma and continue to receive benefits from the retirement system?

¶ 1 The statute most relevant to answering your question is 11 O.S. 49-106 (1981), which provides in pertinent part:

Any fire fighter who reaches the fire fighter's normal retirement date shall be entitled, upon written request, to retire from such service and be paid from the System a monthly pension equal to the member's accrued retirement benefit; provided, that the pension shall cease during any period of time the member may thereafter serve for compensation in any municipal fire department in the state.

(Emphasis added).

¶ 2 In construing or interpreting any statute the goal is to determine and follow legislative intent. Humphrey v. Denney, 757 P.2d 833 (Okla. 1988); Fuller v. Odom, 741 P.2d 449 (Okla. 1987). This statute, on its face, prohibits a retiree from receiving continued pension benefits if he or she works for compensation in a municipal fire department.

¶ 3 Your question implies that this prohibition may be avoided, if the retiree is employed in a capacity other than that of a firefighter (e.g., as a fire marshal). The words used by the Legislature, however, extend the prohibition to any service for compensation. Where the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous and its meaning clear and no occasion exists for application of the rules of statutory construction, the statute should be accorded the meaning as expressed by the language therein employed. Cavett v. Geary Board of Education, 587 P.2d 991 (Okla. 1978). Whether any particular position of employment is within a municipal fire department is, of course, a question of fact for the Board's determination.

¶ 4 It is, therefore, the official opinion of the Attorney General that the proviso of 11 O.S. 49 -106 (1981), prevents a service-retired fire fighter from continuing to receive benefits from the Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System while serving for compensation in any capacity or rank as a member of or in a municipal fire department in the State of Oklahoma.

ROBERT H. HENRY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA

NED BASTOW ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.