Case law

Opinion No. 77-254 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 1, 1977

Const., Article V , Section 36 . Article V, Section 36 has been interpreted as a limitation upon the power of the Legislature rather than a grant of power. The Supreme Court of Oklahoma, in Spearman v. … Otjen v. Mayhue, 476 P.2d 317 (Okl. 1970).

Department of Education v. Gardener

7 Fla. Supp. 2d 165 · State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings · Oct 23, 1984

See, Davis v. Board of Real Estate, Case No. 80-4023 (Recommended Order filed May 8, 1981). … See, Laney v. Holbrook, 8 So.2d 465, 486 (Fla. 1942); Negrich v. Dade County Board of Public Instruction, 143 So.2d 498 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1962).

Liftchild v. State

180 Misc. 292 · New York Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1943

Act, § 1377; Matter of Brown, 131 Misc. 420 .) … Act, § 441; Levine v. Charlow, 254 App. Div. 416, 417 ; Dillon v. Cortland Baking Co., 224 App. Div. 303 ; Kagen v. Avallone, 243 App. Div. 437 ; Ring & Son v. Winola Worsted Yarn Co., 228 N. Y. 127 .)

Community Natural Gas Co. v. Henley

24 S.W.2d 10 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 12, 1930

Co. v. Shoemaker, 98 Tex. 451 , 84 S. W. 1049 ; Harris v. Ry. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 283 S. W. 895 ; Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. v. Davis (Tex. Civ. App.) 161 S. W. 932 ; Atchison, T. S. & P. R. Co. v. Smith (Tex. Civ. … In discussing the principle here enunciated Justice Brown said: “The fact that Armour & Co.’s servants were at work near the track cannot furnish a basis for a presumption that they placed the pipe on the track.

Hale, Sherry v. Prime Package & Label, LLC

2015 TN WC App. 19 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 16, 2015

Manor, Inc. v. State, Dep't of Health & Env't, 849 S.W.2d 755, 759 (Tenn. 1993) (quoting Southern Ry. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 682 S.W.2d 196, 199 (Tenn. 1984)). … Whitesell v. Moore, No. M2011-02745-COA-R3-CV, 2012 Tenn. App. LEXIS 894, at *10 (Tenn. Ct. App.

Opinion No. (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 20, 1979

Wright v. State, 192 Okl. 493 , 137 P.2d 796 (1943). When determining the application of a law, primary considerations should be given to the plain ordinary meaning of the words. … In Re: Certification of Questions of State Law, 560 P.2d 195 (Okl. 1977); Ridley Packaging Co. v. Holliday, 467 P.2d 480 (Okl. 1970).

David R. Webb Co. v. Indiana Department of State Revenue

826 N.E.2d 166 · Indiana Tax Court · Apr 25, 2005

[which means ‘free on board’] the place of destination, the seller must at his own expense and risk transport the goods to that place and there tender delivery of them”). … Indiana Dep’t of State Revenue v. Brown Boveri Corp., 439 N.E.2d 561, 564 (Ind.1982) (internal quotation and citation omitted).

Morristown Firemen's Relief Ass'n v. Town of Morristown

20 N.J. Misc. 113 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 17, 1942

Borough of Neptune City v. Freehold Firemen’s Belief Association, New Jersey Tax Reports, 1934-1939, p. 733 (State Board, 1939). We there referred to Long Branch Firemen’s Relief Association v. … The foregoing considerations require an affirmance of the assessments and of the judgments of the county board. Judgments accordingly.

Crumble, Mae v. Express Services

2016 TN WC 265 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 8, 2016

Appeals Board Opinion The Appeals Board addressed two issues: first, Express’ contention that this Court erred by applying an incorrect legal standard in addressing medical causation. … In addressing these issues, the Board first noted that this Court primarily focused upon the standard set forth in McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06- 0063, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

Opinion No. 77-259 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 31, 1978

Louis-San Francisco Railway v. … In the case of Vogel v.

Opinion No. (1996)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 13, 1996

Grand River Dam Authority v. … All agencies, boards, and commissions shall report all reallocation decisions for both classified and unclassified positions and all adjustments to pay grades or salary assignments for classes in the unclassified service

Stallion, Samuel v. TruGreen, L.P.

2017 TN WC App. 11 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Feb 2, 2017

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Samuel Stallion ) Docket No. 2016-01-0292 ) v. … Finally, we note that the trial court relied on our decisions in Miller v. Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc., No. 2015-05-0158, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 40 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Oct. 21, 2015); Sanker v.

Hinck v. Township of Wall

3 N.J. Tax 96 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 24, 1981

The very next day, October 20, 1976, the Authority conveyed this same parcel to the Monmouth County Board of Chosen Freeholders and the Monmouth County Board of Recreation Commissioners (referred to jointly as “Monmouth County … The rationale of Andover Tp. v. Kymer was argued by the taxpayer in Wiesenfeld v.

Grabbe v. Carroll County Assessor

1 N.E.3d 233 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 31, 2013

STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden to demonstrate that it is invalid. Hubler Realty Co. v. Hendricks Cnty. … See Long v. Wayne Twp. Assessor, 821 N.E.2d 466, 468 (Ind. Tax Ct.2005), review demied.

Bunch v. N.C. Dept. of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 9, 2010

Bolkir v. N.C. State University , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 2. N.C. Gen. … . § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State.

Belcher v. N.C. Dept. of Corr.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jan 22, 2009

. § 143-291 (a) confers the North Carolina Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies … Braswell v. North Carolina A T State University , 5 N.C. App. 1 , 168 S.E.2d 24 (1969); Jenkins v.

Frye, Annette v. Vincent Printing Co.

2016 TN WC 147 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 16, 2016

McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Mar. 27, 2015). … In McCaffery v. Cardinal Logistics, No. 2015-08-0218, 2015 1N Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 50, at *9-10 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd.

Jones v. N.C. Dept. of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 13, 2007

. § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Bolkir v. N.C. State University , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 3.

Murillo, Said Omar Jemenez v. Leonard Sams and Associates

2019 TN WC 108 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 17, 2019

Peters v. Mitchell d/b/a A Clean Connection, LLC, 2016 TN Wrk. Camp. App. Bd. LEXIS 7, at *8-9 (Feb. 8, 2016). … Employee v.

In re the Estate of Kelly

144 Misc. 330 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 19, 1932

It is a general principle or rule of construction that where a will speaks of the death of a devisee without issue it refers to such death occurring during the lifetime of the testator. ' (Brown v. Gardner, 233 N. … Y. 261 ; Lawrence v. Calam, 236 id. 168; Fowler v. Ingersoll, 127 id. 472; Vanderzee v. Slingerland, 103 id. 47; Quackenboss v. Kingsland, 102 id. 128.)