Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

0.83s

  • Opinion No. (1994)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 29, 1994

    Sneed v. Sneed, 585 P.2d 1363 (Okla. 1978). … Bell v. United Farm Agency Inc., 296 P.2d 149 (Okla. 1956). Finally, a statute should be given a sensible construction, bearing in mind the evils to be avoided or the remedy afforded. Samson Resources Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Goodmark foods/conagra

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jan 17, 2002

    When asked by Margaret Brown, Occupational Nurse for defendant-employer, whether his injury was related to his employment, plaintiff denied that it was. … In Adams v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Diocese of Newton for the Melkites in the USA, Inc. v. Peggy Holinga Katona, in Her Capacity as Lake County Treasurer, and John Petalas, in His Capacity as Lake County Auditor

    Indiana Tax Court · Jun 5, 2020

    K.S. v. State, 849 N.E.2d 538, 540 (Ind. 2006). … State v. Sproles, 672 N.E.2d 1353, 1356 (Ind. 1996). If a court does not have subject matter jurisdiction, any judgment that it renders is void. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1979)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 13, 1979

    In Hood v. … McIntosh v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Heard, April v. Carrier Corporation

    2018 TN WC App. 14 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Apr 20, 2018

    Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp., 32 S.W.3d 222, 227 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). … Hessmer v. Hessmer, 138 S.W.3d 901, 903-04 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003) (citations omitted).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chavez, Raul Morelos v. Jesus Morelos Chavez

    2024 TN WC App. 17 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Apr 11, 2024

    Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). However, “[n]o similar deference need be afforded the trial court’s findings based upon documentary evidence.” Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., No. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2003)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 20, 2003

    As was noted by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Irwin v. … , subject to Board approval. . . .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tunnell v. Reeves

    35 S.W.2d 707 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 4, 1931

    Patrick v. Smith, 90 Tex. 267 , 38 S. W. 17 ; Houston & T. C. Ry. Co. v. Strycharski, 92 Tex. 1 , 37 S. W. 415 ; Choate v. S. A. & A. P. Ry. Co., 91 Tex. 406 , 44 S. W. 69 . … The rule is clearly stated by the Supreme Court by Judge Brown in Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. Strycharski, 92 Tex. 1 , 37 S.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Riensche v. Department of Revenue

    8 Or. Tax 304 · Oregon Tax Court · Mar 20, 1980

    As this court noted in Starker v. … See Cook v. Michael, 214 Or 513, 525-528 , 330 P2d 1026 (1958); Stattes el al v. U. S, 63-2 USTC ¶9755 , 12 AFTR2d 5757 (SD WVa 1963).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Commercial Casualty Insurance v. City of Newark

    18 N.J. Misc. 233 · New Jersey Tax Court · Apr 2, 1940

    Second National Bank, Red Bank v. State Board of Tax Appeals (Supreme Court, 1935), 114 N. J. L. 573; 178 Atl. Rep. 96 ; and see General Motors Corp. v. State Board of Tax Appeals (Supreme Court, Feb. 23d, 1940), 124 N. … Second National Bank v. State Board, 114 N. J. L. 573.” And eases therein cited.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 74-227 (1975) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 10, 1975

    Barton v. Derryberry, 500 P.2d 281 (Okl., 1972); Bass v. Board of Commissioners of Lincoln County, 222 P. 995 (Okl., 1924); Attorney General Opinion No. 74-180; Attorney General Opinion No. 65-294. … of Commissioners of Delaware County v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kingsdown, Inc. v. Hinshaw

    2016 NCBC 16 · North Carolina Business Court · Feb 17, 2016

    At the hearing, counsel for Kingsdown indicated a willingness to consult with Kingsdown’s Board as to whether the Board had, in its view, made a final determination as to Mr. Hinshaw’s and Ms. … Jarman v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 75-340 (1976) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 16, 1976

    Use of the word "shall" is equivalent to the word "must" and leaves the Board no discretion to avoid following this statute. State v. Jennings, Okl., 463 P.2d 690 , 692 (1970); Ogden v. … In Marcus v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hawes, James v. McLane Company, Inc.

    2021 TN WC App. 72 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 25, 2021

    Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). However, a trial court’s findings based upon documentary evidence is reviewed do novo with no presumption of correctness. Goodman v. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Community Natural Gas Co. v. Henley

    24 S.W.2d 10 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 12, 1930

    Co. v. Shoemaker, 98 Tex. 451 , 84 S. W. 1049 ; Harris v. Ry. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 283 S. W. 895 ; Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. v. Davis (Tex. Civ. App.) 161 S. W. 932 ; Atchison, T. S. & P. R. Co. v. Smith (Tex. Civ. … In discussing the principle here enunciated Justice Brown said: “The fact that Armour & Co.’s servants were at work near the track cannot furnish a basis for a presumption that they placed the pipe on the track.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Wright. Rashard v. April Crowder, d/b/a Mr. P's Buffalo Wings Plus

    2021 TN WC 247 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 6, 2021

    See, e.g., Ducros v. Metro Roofing and Metal Supply Co., Inc., TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Turner, Arebius v. Advantage Human Resourcing, Inc.

    2020 TN WC 73 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 10, 2020

    Willis v. All Staff, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 42, at *27 (Nov. 9, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Geauga Cty. Pros. Office v. Munson Fire Dept.

    2023 Ohio 4437 · Ohio Court of Claims · Nov 28, 2023

    See Kish v. … Board of Trustees.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 9, 1976

    in which such child resides, under rules and regulations approved by the State Board of Education; provided, however, that the eligibility of exceptional children shall be reevaluated at least once every three (3) years. … In this regard see Sebring v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp., 401 P.2d 479 , and other cases cited at 13 Okla. Digest, page 503, et seq.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Morris, Damon Curry v. Select Services

    2025 TN WC App. 35 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 19, 2025

    TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Damon Curry Morris Docket No. 2022-08-1069 v. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.