Case law

Opinion No. (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 15, 1992

HESS V. EXCISE BOARD OF MCCURTAIN COUNTY, 698 P.2D 930 (OKLA.1985.) FURTHER, A STATUTE SHOULD BE CONSTRUED TO PRODUCE A REASONABLE RESULT AND TO PROMOTE, RATHER THAN DEFEAT, THE GENERAL PURPOSE AND POLICY OF THE LAW. … V. STATE, 598 P.2D 254 (OKL.CR.1979). THE GENERAL PURPOSE AND POLICY OF THE ACT IS TO PROVIDE A RETIREMENT SYSTEM FOR THOSE MEMBERS DEFINED IN 47 O.S. 2 -300(5) OF THE ACT.

Fritts, Charles v. Ronnie Waldrop dba Peerless Painting

2021 TN WC 166 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 25, 2021

Simpson v. Satterfield, 564 8.W.2d 953, 955 (Tenn. 1978). … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

Village Community School v. Adler

124 Misc. 2d 817 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jul 12, 1984

(See Donohue v Copiague Union Free School Dist., 47 NY2d 440 , supra; Hoffman v Board of Educ., 49 NY2d 121 , supra.) … (Donohue v Copiague Union Free School Dist., 47 NY2d, at p 440 ; Hoffman v Board of Educ., 49 NY2d, at p 121 ; Helm v Professional Children’s School, 103 Misc 2d, at p 1053 ; Washington v City of New York, 83 AD2d 195 , supra

Kean, Carma v. Navion BKE Bellevue, LLC

2024 TN WC App. 34 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Sep 26, 2024

See Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 250 (Tenn. 2015). … Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp., 32 S.W.3d 222, 227 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).

Warren, Edward v. The Pictsweet Co.

2019 TN WC App. 47 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 17, 2019

Martin v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 271 S.W.3d 76, 83 (Tenn. 2008). … TWB Architects, Inc. v. Braxton, LLC, No. M2017-00423-SC-R11- CV, 2019 Tenn. LEXIS 296, at *21 (Tenn. July 22, 2019) (citing Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 331 (1986)).

Melendez, Anana v. Wolfe Co.

2020 TN WC 64 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 6, 2020

Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 2015). At this Compensation Hearing, Ms. … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

Wilson, Bradley v. Dana Holding Corporation

2016 TN WC App. 66 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Nov 30, 2016

See, e.g., Cleek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 19 S.W.3d 770, 776 (Tenn. 2000). … See, e.g., Quinn v. SMX, No. 2015-06-0025, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 25, at *10 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd.

Batcha v. Hopewell Township

18 N.J. Tax 1 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 13, 1997

At that time qualifying agricultural activities did not include the boarding and training of horses. See Bloomingdale, Ind. Park v. Bloomingdale Bor., 1 N.J.Tax 145, 148-149 (Tax 1980); Dowd v. … Park v. Bloomingdale Bor., supra; Dowd v. Howell Tp., supra and N.J.S.A. 54:4-23.3.

In re Bosco

59 Pa. D. & C.2d 444 · Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board · Oct 5, 1972

Samples of the water were presented for the board’s inspection, but this alone is of little value. … In Belin et al. v. Department of Environmental Resources, 5 Comm.

Cincinnati, Lebanon & Northern Railway Co. v. City of Cincinnati

16 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 587 · Hamilton County Court of Insolvency · Dec 24, 1914

On March 14th, 1899, the board of public affairs passed a resolution as follows: “Be it Resolved, That this board hereby declares that the lots remaining unsold in Eden Park subdivision lying west of Gilbert avenue are necessary … In Fries v.

Bush, Amy v. Stones River Center/RHA Health Services

2019 TN WC 73 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 6, 2019

Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2018); see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If RHA is successful in meeting this burden, Ms. … To appeal to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

McQuiddy, Jana v. Saint Thomas Midtown Hospital

2016 TN WC App. 52 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 7, 2016

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Jana McQuiddy ) Docket No. 2015-06-0593 ) v. … See Leek v. Powell, 884 S.W.2d 118, 121 (Tenn. Ct.

Opinion No. (2000)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 25, 2000

Hawkins v. … Therefore, funds received by the State under the Revenue Sharing Act were subject to appropriation under Article V, § 55 and to inclusion in the State Board of Equalization's estimate pursuant to Article X, § 23.

Lewis v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

176 Misc. 2d 947 · Civil Court of the City of New York · May 13, 1998

Co. v Dickerson, 470 US 409 [1985].) The Supreme Court, while recognizing “ ‘the impossibility of laying down a precise rule to distinguish “substance” from “procedure,” ’ Brown v. Western R. Co. of Alabama, 338 U. … (Brown v Western Ry. of Ala., 338 US 294 [1949], supra.) *950 The court finds that a limitation on liability as contained in article 16 is an issue of substantive not procedural law.

Glenn, Terrance v. Sears Outlet Stores, LLC

2019 TN WC 115 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 29, 2019

The Appeals Board affirmed the order. Afterward, Sears filed a wage statement. It listed Mr. … McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

Sage v. Bernards Township

5 N.J. Tax 52 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 14, 1982

Co. v. … Co. v.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 1980

Wasson v. Carden, Okl., 594 P.2d 1223 (1979); Dowell v. Welch, Okl. App., 574 P.2d 1089 (1978); and Matter of Estate of Rogers, Okl. App., 569 P.2d 536 (1977) . The Oklahoma Supreme Court in Wasson v. … In Dowell v.

Opinion No. (2003)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 3, 2003

Sneed v. Sneed, 585 P.2d 1363 , 1364 (Okla. 1978). … Co. v. Okla. Tax Comm'n, 563 P.2d 641 , 643 (Okla. 1977); McDonald's Corp. v. Okla. Tax Comm'n, 563 P.2d 635 , 641 (Okla. 1977); Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Okla.

Grace & Peace Fellowship Church, Inc. v. Cranford Township

4 N.J. Tax 391 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 10, 1982

Board of National Missions, etc. v. Neeld, 9 N.J. 349, 353 , 88 A.2d 500 (1952). The burden is upon the claimant to clearly bring himself within an exemption provision. Ibid. … Olivet Baptist Church v.

Brisbane House, Inc. v. Sims

122 Misc. 2d 46 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Dec 8, 1983

Corp., 6 NY2d 426 ; see, also, Penthouse Props, v 1158 Fifth Ave., 256 App Div 685 ). … of directors (Adams Hotel Owners v Wolf, 64 Misc 2d 614 [App Term, 1st Dept]).