Case law

In re the Estate of Randell

147 Misc. 358 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 20, 1933

I direct my executor and trustee as soon as may be after my death to pay over to the Board of Trustees or other Governing Body for the time being of the Drexel Institute, Philadelphia, United States of America, all the rest … (Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. v. Winthrop, 238 N. Y. 488, at p. 493 .)

Opinion No. 73-240 (1973) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 17, 1973

In summary, the determination of whether to renegotiate the loan with OCIA is an administrative decision to be made by the Board of Directors of OIFA according to sound business principles. … The restrictions of Article V , Section 53 of the Oklahoma Constitution would not apply to this situation.

In re the Accounting of Stern

17 Misc. 2d 396 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 12, 1959

Similarly, the City of New York is entitled to priority in the payment of its claim for unpaid sales taxes since the unpaid sales tax is a debt due the State (Matter of McClatchey, 170 Misc. 696, 701 ; Matter of Brown Print … The remaining creditors named in Schedule D-l, share pro rata, being general creditors within. the same class, 'there is no preference among them (Woodruff v. Claflin Co., 198 N. Y. 470, 473 ).

Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. City of Jersey City

20 N.J. Misc. 327 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 30, 1942

In Jersey City v. Board of Equalization of Taxes (Supreme Court, 1907), 74 N. J. L. 382; 65 Atl. … Newton Trust Co. v. Atwood (Supreme Court, 1908), 77 N. J. L. 141; 71 Atl. Rep. 110 . It therefore follows that the judgments of the county board in the 1940 cases must he affirmed.

Knott, Rhonda v. Great Lakes Cheese of TN, Inc.

2021 TN WC App. 86 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 10, 2021

Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). However, “[n]o similar deference need be afforded the trial court’s findings based upon documentary evidence.” Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., No. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

Beecher, Carolyn v. McKesson Corporation

2016 TN WC App. 71 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 19, 2016

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Carolyn Beecher ) Docket No. 2016-08-0279 ) v. … See Leek v. Powell, 884 S.W.2d 118, 121 (Tenn. Ct.

Higgins, Darrius v. Big K Food Market & Liquors, Inc.

2014 TN WC App. 3 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 8, 2014

Clay County Manor, Inc. v. State of Tennessee, 849 S.W.2d 755, 759 (Tenn. 1993 )(quoting Southern Railway Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 682 S. W.2d 196, 199 (Tenn. 1984)). … Service v. Rodell, 42 S.W.3d 846, 865 (Tenn. App. 2000). !d. at *6-7.

Perry v. INDIANA DEPT. LOCAL GOV. FINANCE

892 N.E.2d 1281 · Indiana Tax Court · Aug 22, 2008

892 N.E.2d 1281 (2008) Virginia PERRY, Gregg Terhune, and other similarly situated individuals, Petitioners, v. … Amax, Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs, 552 N.E.2d 850, 852 (Ind.

Opinion No. 79-313b (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 15, 1980

Wiseman v. Oklahoma Board of Corrections, et al, Okl. P.2d (1978), 49 OBJ 2436. The Wiseman v. Board of Corrections decision presently pends on rehearing. … See also, Gordon v. Conners, 183 Okl. 82 , 80 P.2d 322 (1938); Board of Commissioners of Pottawotamie County v. A. C. Davis and Sons, 184 Okl. 258 , 86 P.2d 782 (1939).

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 9, 1956

OPINION — AG — ** ELECTION — LEGISLATURE — LOT ** (1) THE STATE ELECTION BOARD IS 'NOT' AUTHORIZED BY 26 O.S. 133 [26-133], IN THE EVENT A TIE VOTE OCCURS IN THE ELECTION OF A STATE SENATOR (OR REPRESENTATIVE) IN A GENERAL … (TIE VOTE, CERTIFICATES, QUALIFICATIONS) CITE: ARTICLE VI, SECTION 6, ARTICLE V, SECTION 30, 26 O.S. 113 [ 26-113 ], 26 O.S. 392 [ 26-392 ], ARTICLE XV, SECTION (FRED HANSEN)

In re the Estate of Evans

135 Misc. 656 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 28, 1929

(Doctor v. Hughes, 225 N. Y. 305 ; Whittemore v. Equitable Trust Company, 162 App. Div. 607 ; Gage v. Irving Bank & Trust Co., 222 id. 92.) Mary R. Evans is still alive and while living she can have no next of kin. … (Dwight v. Fancher, 245 N. Y. 71 ; *658 Reynolds v. Reynolds, 224 id. 429; Brown v. Quintard, 177 id. 75.)

Williams, Linda (by Lawrence Williams, surviving spouse) v. Methodist Lebonheur Healthcare

2022 TN WC 13 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 10, 2022

To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1. … The appealing party has fifteen calendar days after the date of that notice to submit a brief to the Appeals Board. See the Practices and Procedures of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board.

Opinion No. 73-110 (1973) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 30, 1973

Tulsa Exposition and Fair Corporation v. Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, Okl., 468 P.2d 501 (1970). … Stewart v. Verde River Irrigation and Power District, 49 Ariz. 531 , 68 P.2d 329 , 334 . See also Hanson v.

Opinion No. (1988)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 15, 1988

AN EMPLOYEE OF ANY STATE DEPARTMENT BOARD. BOARD OF REGENTS OR BOARD OF TRUSTEES, WHO IS IN A SUPERVISORY OR AN ADMINISTRATIVE POSITION. … GILBERT CENTRAL CORP V. STATE, 716 P.2D 654 (OKL. 1986). THE OPERATIVE RULE OF GRAMMAR IS THE ONE THAT PLACES RELATIVE PRONOUNS (THE WORD "WHICH") AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO THEIR ANTECEDENTS (THE WORD "POSITION").

Opinion No. Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 2, 1988

The authority of state boards to make rules for their various procedures does not, however, include the authority to make rules which in effect extend their powers beyond those granted by statute. Boydston v. … Boughton v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 354 P.2d 1085 (Okl. 1960); Wilson v. Gregg, 255 P.2d 517 (Okl. 1953); and Burke Grain Co. v. Stinchcomb, 173 P. 204 (Okl. 1918).

Question Submitted by: The Honorable Stan May, Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 80

2024 OK AG 13 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 19, 2024

See Rogers v. … PORTER v. FERRELL Discussed Title 6.

Opinion

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 2, 1990

OR COMMISSION DOES 'NOT' VIOLATE ARTICLE V , SECTION 51 OF THE OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION. 2. … OR COMMISSION DOES VIOLATE ARTICLE V , SECTION 51 OF THE OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION. 3.

Glenn v. Morrow County Unified Recreation District

14 Or. Tax 344 · Oregon Tax Court · Jul 17, 1998

Harris v. U of M Bd. of Regents, 558 NW2d 225 (Mich Ct App 1996); Boyd v. Bd. of Directors of McGehee School Dist., 612 F Supp 86 (ED Ark 1985); Brenden v. … Independent School District 742, 477 F2d 1292 (8th Cir 1973); State v. Stojack, 330 P2d 567 (Wash 1958); Moyer v. Board of Education, 62 NE2d 802 , (Ill 1945); Wysong v. Walden, 52 SE2d 392 (W Va 1938).

Shippee v. Brick Township

20 N.J. Tax 427 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 4, 2002

Schumar v. … Only the assessors’ and county boards’ ultimate conclusions of value are examined. WCI-Westinghouse v. Edison Tp., 7 N.J.

Moser v. Department of Revenue

4 Or. Tax 256 · Oregon Tax Court · Dec 21, 1970

The cost basis for this tract during the period in question was $24.77 per thousand board feet. … Gregory v. Helvering, supra; U.S. v. Cumberland Public Service Co., 338 US 451 , 70 S Ct 225 , 94 L Ed 251 (1950). As was said by the court in the case of Kuhns et ux v.