Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.58s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 21, 1975
In the case of Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v. … McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, 442 P.2d 297 (1968).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 2011
Bland v. St. … (citing Hatfield v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGookenbarger, Paul v. The Kroger Company
2022 TN WC 77 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 4, 2022
Code Ann. § 20-16-101(2022); Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If Kroger does so, Mr. … See the Rules governing the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board on the Bureau’s website If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the trial court’s Order will become final by operation of law thirty
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 22, 1972
Board of Trustees of Police Pension and Retirement System of Tulsa v. Kern, Okl., 366 P.2d 415 , 418 (1961); Board of Trustees of Firemans Relief and Pension Fund v. … Robinson v. Police Pension Board for City of Tucson, 85 Ariz. 384 , 339 P.2d 739 (1959).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 13, 1983
OPINION — AG — ** AD VALOREM TAXATION — FORMULA — STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION ** THE PROVISIONS OF 70 O.S. 18 -109.1 [ 70-18-109.1 ] WHICH STATE THE LEGISLATIVE INTENT TO ALTER THE FORMULA USED TO DETERMINE THE RELATIONSHIP … POULOS V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHagan, Kimberly v. Potomac Corp.
2021 TN WC 243 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 19, 2021
Ibarra v. Amazon Fulfillment Serv., Inc., 2020 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 13, at *5 (Apr. 1, 2020). … Bass v. The Home Depot U.S.A, Inc., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 36, at *9 (May 26, 2017).
Cited 0 timesPublishedWHITE, WIGELIA v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP.
2026 TN WC 15 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 24, 2026
See Cunningham v. Shelton Sec. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 30, 1997
Supp. 1996, § 6[ 51-6 ] (A). ¶ 2 The test for determining whether a position is an office for purposes of this section is set forth in Oklahoma City v. Century Indemnity Co., 62 P.2d 94 (Okla. 1936). … Id. at 97 (citations omitted). ¶ 3 The Oklahoma Supreme Court, in applying this three-part test, determined that school board members are officers. See Gibson v. Crowder, 165 P.2d 628 (Okla. 1946).
Cited 0 timesPublishedJohnson, Dorothy v. Pilgrim's Pride, Inc.
2017 TN WC App. 17 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Feb 13, 2017
Creech v. Addington, 281 S.W.3d 363, 376 (Tenn. 2009). … See Leek v. Powell, 884 S.W.2d 118, 121 (Tenn. Ct.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 3, 2005
Lemly v. Colvard Oil Co. , 157 N.C. App. 99 , 577 S.E.2d 712 (2003). … Therefore, under Lemly v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 28, 2011
Cowart v. Piper Aircraft Corp. , 665 P.2d 315 , 317 (Okla. 1983). … Jackson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 16 , 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCity of Newark v. Block 322, Lots 38 & 40
17 N.J. Tax 103 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 1, 1997
For 1993, a tax appeal was filed, the county board affirmed the assessment, and no further appeal was taken. For the prior years, no appeals were taken. Thus, under N.J.S.A 54:3-21, F.M.C. Stores Co. v. … Blair Academy v. Blairstown Tp., 95 N.J.Super. 583 , 232 A.2d 178 (App.Div.1967), certif. denied 50 N.J. 293 , 234 A.2d 401 (1967); Emanuel Missionary Baptist Church v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 29, 1977
Title 80 O.S. 34 .3 [ 80-34.3 ] (1971), provides in part: "The Surplus Property Agent shall have the authority, and it shall be his duty, under the supervision and direction of the State Board of Public Affairs, to ". . . … It was held in the case of Oklahoma Tax Commission, et al. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished19 Or. Tax 519 · Oregon Tax Court · Nov 5, 2008
The department cites Kaady v. … In Sherman v.
Cited 28 timesPublishedRohrman v. TIPPECANOE COUNTY ASSESSOR
901 N.E.2d 95 · Indiana Tax Court · Feb 10, 2009
Robert V. Rohrman (Rohrman) appeals the final determination of the Indiana Board of Tax Review (Indiana Board) valuing his real property as of the March 1, 2004 and 2005 assessment dates. … See K.S. v. State, 849 N.E.2d 538, 541-42 (Ind.2006) (stating that to characterize procedural defects or errors as "jurisdictional" misapprehends that concept) (citation omitted); Packard v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFrancoeur, Bibiane v. Amerimed Medical Solutions, LLC
2024 TN WC App. 36 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 21, 2024
Id. at 639; see also Curtis v. G.E. … Pool v. Metric Constructors, Inc., 681 S.W.2d 543, 544 (Tenn. 1984); see also Smith v. Royal Globe Ins.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 30, 1999
The primary responsibility lies with the State Board of Agriculture. … A statute is not unconstitutionally vague when it (a) sets forth the legislative policy and the standards for administrative action, Democratic Party of Oklahoma v. Estep, 652 P.2d 271 , 277 n. 23 (Okla. 1982), State v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDragonfly Holdings LLC v. Multnomah County Assessor
Oregon Tax Court · Nov 27, 2012
Defendant was represented by Jeff Brown (Brown) and Stephanie McQuown (McQuown), both of whom are appraisers with the Multnomah County Assessor’s office. … Allen v. Dept. of Rev., 17 OTR 248, 252 (2003); Gangle v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPhiladelphia Underwriters' Agency of Fire Ass'n v. Moore
229 S.W. 490 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 23, 1921
Bills v. Hibernia Insurance Co., 87 Tex. 547 , 29 S. W. 1063 , 29 L. R. A. 706, 47 Am. St. Rep. 121 ; Brown v. Palatine Insurance Co., 89 Tex. 590 , 35 S. W. 1060 ; Dumphy v. … W. 814 ; Insurance Co. of North America v. O’ Bannon, supra. The extent to which the rule should be applied may be gathered from the following language in Brown v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedHunter, Dale v. Doug's Automotive
2019 TN WC 128 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 23, 2019
Code Ann. § 50-6- 239(d)(1) (2018); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). To prove a compensable injury, Mr. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna