Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

0.58s

  • Opinion No.

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 21, 1975

    In the case of Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v. … McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, 442 P.2d 297 (1968).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 11-16 (2011)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 2011

    Bland v. St. … (citing Hatfield v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gookenbarger, Paul v. The Kroger Company

    2022 TN WC 77 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 4, 2022

    Code Ann. § 20-16-101(2022); Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If Kroger does so, Mr. … See the Rules governing the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board on the Bureau’s website If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the trial court’s Order will become final by operation of law thirty

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 72-146 (1972) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 22, 1972

    Board of Trustees of Police Pension and Retirement System of Tulsa v. Kern, Okl., 366 P.2d 415 , 418 (1961); Board of Trustees of Firemans Relief and Pension Fund v. … Robinson v. Police Pension Board for City of Tucson, 85 Ariz. 384 , 339 P.2d 739 (1959).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 13, 1983

    OPINION — AG — ** AD VALOREM TAXATION — FORMULA — STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION ** THE PROVISIONS OF 70 O.S. 18 -109.1 [ 70-18-109.1 ] WHICH STATE THE LEGISLATIVE INTENT TO ALTER THE FORMULA USED TO DETERMINE THE RELATIONSHIP … POULOS V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hagan, Kimberly v. Potomac Corp.

    2021 TN WC 243 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 19, 2021

    Ibarra v. Amazon Fulfillment Serv., Inc., 2020 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 13, at *5 (Apr. 1, 2020). … Bass v. The Home Depot U.S.A, Inc., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 36, at *9 (May 26, 2017).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • WHITE, WIGELIA v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP.

    2026 TN WC 15 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 24, 2026

    See Cunningham v. Shelton Sec. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1997)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 30, 1997

    Supp. 1996, § 6[ 51-6 ] (A). ¶ 2 The test for determining whether a position is an office for purposes of this section is set forth in Oklahoma City v. Century Indemnity Co., 62 P.2d 94 (Okla. 1936). … Id. at 97 (citations omitted). ¶ 3 The Oklahoma Supreme Court, in applying this three-part test, determined that school board members are officers. See Gibson v. Crowder, 165 P.2d 628 (Okla. 1946).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Johnson, Dorothy v. Pilgrim's Pride, Inc.

    2017 TN WC App. 17 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Feb 13, 2017

    Creech v. Addington, 281 S.W.3d 363, 376 (Tenn. 2009). … See Leek v. Powell, 884 S.W.2d 118, 121 (Tenn. Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lee v. Wake Cty.

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 3, 2005

    Lemly v. Colvard Oil Co. , 157 N.C. App. 99 , 577 S.E.2d 712 (2003). … Therefore, under Lemly v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2011)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 28, 2011

    Cowart v. Piper Aircraft Corp. , 665 P.2d 315 , 317 (Okla. 1983). … Jackson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 16 , 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Newark v. Block 322, Lots 38 & 40

    17 N.J. Tax 103 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 1, 1997

    For 1993, a tax appeal was filed, the county board affirmed the assessment, and no further appeal was taken. For the prior years, no appeals were taken. Thus, under N.J.S.A 54:3-21, F.M.C. Stores Co. v. … Blair Academy v. Blairstown Tp., 95 N.J.Super. 583 , 232 A.2d 178 (App.Div.1967), certif. denied 50 N.J. 293 , 234 A.2d 401 (1967); Emanuel Missionary Baptist Church v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1977) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 29, 1977

    Title 80 O.S. 34 .3 [ 80-34.3 ] (1971), provides in part: "The Surplus Property Agent shall have the authority, and it shall be his duty, under the supervision and direction of the State Board of Public Affairs, to ". . . … It was held in the case of Oklahoma Tax Commission, et al. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Paris v. Dept. of Rev.

    19 Or. Tax 519 · Oregon Tax Court · Nov 5, 2008

    The department cites Kaady v. … In Sherman v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Rohrman v. TIPPECANOE COUNTY ASSESSOR

    901 N.E.2d 95 · Indiana Tax Court · Feb 10, 2009

    Robert V. Rohrman (Rohrman) appeals the final determination of the Indiana Board of Tax Review (Indiana Board) valuing his real property as of the March 1, 2004 and 2005 assessment dates. … See K.S. v. State, 849 N.E.2d 538, 541-42 (Ind.2006) (stating that to characterize procedural defects or errors as "jurisdictional" misapprehends that concept) (citation omitted); Packard v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Francoeur, Bibiane v. Amerimed Medical Solutions, LLC

    2024 TN WC App. 36 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 21, 2024

    Id. at 639; see also Curtis v. G.E. … Pool v. Metric Constructors, Inc., 681 S.W.2d 543, 544 (Tenn. 1984); see also Smith v. Royal Globe Ins.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1999)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 30, 1999

    The primary responsibility lies with the State Board of Agriculture. … A statute is not unconstitutionally vague when it (a) sets forth the legislative policy and the standards for administrative action, Democratic Party of Oklahoma v. Estep, 652 P.2d 271 , 277 n. 23 (Okla. 1982), State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dragonfly Holdings LLC v. Multnomah County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · Nov 27, 2012

    Defendant was represented by Jeff Brown (Brown) and Stephanie McQuown (McQuown), both of whom are appraisers with the Multnomah County Assessor’s office. … Allen v. Dept. of Rev., 17 OTR 248, 252 (2003); Gangle v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Philadelphia Underwriters' Agency of Fire Ass'n v. Moore

    229 S.W. 490 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 23, 1921

    Bills v. Hibernia Insurance Co., 87 Tex. 547 , 29 S. W. 1063 , 29 L. R. A. 706, 47 Am. St. Rep. 121 ; Brown v. Palatine Insurance Co., 89 Tex. 590 , 35 S. W. 1060 ; Dumphy v. … W. 814 ; Insurance Co. of North America v. O’ Bannon, supra. The extent to which the rule should be applied may be gathered from the following language in Brown v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Hunter, Dale v. Doug's Automotive

    2019 TN WC 128 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 23, 2019

    Code Ann. § 50-6- 239(d)(1) (2018); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). To prove a compensable injury, Mr. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.