Opinion

Gookenbarger, Paul v. The Kroger Company

  • 2022 TN WC 77
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Nov 4, 2022
Status
Published
On the bench
Brian K. Addington
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 11.0%

The opinion

FILED

Nov 04, 2022

07:14 AM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT KNOXVILLE

PAUL GOOKENBARGER, ) Docket No. 2021-03-0696

Employee, )

v. )

THE KROGER COMPANY )

Employer, ) State File No. 59262-2018

and )

TROY HALEY, )

Administrator of the Bureau of )

Workers’ Compensation, Subsequent ) Judge Brian K. Addington

Injury Fund. )

COMPENSATION ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The Court heard Kroger’s Motion for Summary Judgment on November 1, 2022.

Kroger contends summary judgment is warranted because more than a year lapsed between

its final payment and the date Mr. Gookenbarger filed a Petition for Benefit Determination.

Mr. Gookenbarger did not respond to the motion. The undisputed proof is that he did not

file his petition within one year of Kroger’s last payment. Therefore, Kroger is entitled to

summary judgment.

History of Claim

Mr. Gookenbarger alleged a low-back injury while lifting boxes and pallets at

Kroger on July 13, 2018. Kroger provided medical treatment including surgery. On

September 11, 2019, Dr. Patrick Bolt placed Mr. Gookenbarger at maximum medical

improvement and assigned a nine-percent impairment.

On October 9, Kroger mailed an offer to settle Mr. Gookenbarger’s claim. The next

day, it issued payment for Dr. Bolt’s September office visit. Kroger sent another letter

attempting to settle his claim on April 6, 2020. Mr. Gookenbarger did not respond. Once a

year passed after the last payment, Kroger closed its file.

1

However, Mr. Gookenbarger later asked for additional treatment. Kroger denied his

request, and Mr. Gookenbarger filed the present petition on July 9, 2021.

After the Scheduling Order, Kroger moved for summary judgment arguing Mr.

Gookenbarger’s case was barred by the statute of limitations. In support of its motion,

Kroger filed the following statement of undisputed facts.

1. Paul Gookenbarger reportedly suffered an injury on or around July 18, 2018.

2. On September 11, 2019, Dr. Bolt placed the employee at maximum medical

improvement with 9% permanent partial impairment to the body as a whole.

3. The employee has not treated with Dr. Bolt since the September 11, 2019

appointment.

4. Kroger’s last indemnity payment to the employee was March 29, 2019.

5. Kroger’s last payment for medical benefits was made on October 10, 2019, to

Dr. Bolt’s office for the employee’s September 11, 2019 appointment.

6. On July 9, 2021, the employee filed a Petition.

Kroger contends these facts entitle it to summary judgment because they show no

genuine issue of material fact exists regarding Mr. Gookenbarger’s failure to file a petition

within one year of Kroger’s last payment on the claim.

Mr. Gookenbarger neither responded to Kroger’s motion nor did he file affidavits

or depositions to support his claim. He explained at the summary judgment hearing that he

thought he would always have open medical benefits because he suffered an on-the-job

injury.

Law and Analysis

Under Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure 56.04 (2021), summary judgment is

appropriate if “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on

file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any

material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”

To prevail as the party requesting summary judgment, Kroger must do one of two

things: (1) submit affirmative evidence that negates an essential element of Mr.

Gookenbarger’s claim; or (2) demonstrate that Mr. Gookenbarger’s evidence is insufficient

to establish an essential element of his claim. Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-16-101(2022); Rye v.

Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If Kroger

does so, Mr. Gookenbarger must then establish that the record contains specific facts upon

which the Court could base a decision in his favor. Rye, at 265.

Turning to the merits of the motion, the Court finds that Kroger proved Mr.

Gookenbarger did not timely file a petition under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-

2

6-203(b)(2), which requires the filing of a petition within one year after the work accident

or within one year after the employer “ceased to make payments of compensation to or on

behalf of the employee.” So, Kroger negated an essential element of Mr. Gookenbarger’s

claim – that he must file his petition within one year of Kroger’s last payment of benefits.

Mr. Gookenbarger offered no evidence on which the Court could rely to find that he did

file his petition within the one-year period.

Therefore, the Court holds no genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether Mr.

Gookenbarger timely filed his petition. Kroger’s motion is granted.

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. Mr. Gookenbarger’s claim for workers’ compensation benefits is dismissed with

prejudice to its refiling.

2. Unless appealed, this order shall become final thirty days after entry.

3. The Court taxes a $150.00 filing fee to Kroger under Tennessee Compilation Rules

and Regulations 0800-02-21-.06, payable to the Clerk within five days of this order

becoming final.

4. Kroger shall prepare and submit the SD-2 to the Clerk within ten days of the date of

judgment.

IT IS ORDERED.

ENTERED November 4, 2022.

______________________________________

BRIAN K. ADDINGTON, JUDGE

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the order was sent on November 4, 2022.

Name Certified Fax Email Service sent to:

Mail

Paul Gookenbarger, X X 305 Ashley Dr.

Self-Represented Seymour, TN 37865

Employee paul2401@sbcglobal.net

Heather Douglas, X hdouglas@manierherod.com

Jenna MacNair jmacnair@manierherod.com

Employer’s Attorneys

Lindsay Hall, X lindsay.n.hall@tn.gov

Subsequent Injury Fund

Attorney

______________________________________

PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

4

Compensation Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Compensation Order, you may appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board. To do so, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled “Notice of Appeal” and file it with the Clerk of the

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within thirty calendar days of the date the

Compensation Order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy

upon the opposing party (or attorney, if represented).

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar

days after filing the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office

or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an

Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office)

seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fully-completed Affidavit of Indigency

within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing

fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of your appeal.

3. You are responsible for ensuring a complete record is presented on appeal. The Court Clerk

will prepare the technical record and exhibits for submission to the Appeals Board, and you

will receive notice once it has been submitted. If no court reporter was present at the hearing,

you may request from the Court Clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee.

A licensed court reporter must prepare a transcript, and you must file it with the Court Clerk

within fifteen calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a

statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both parties within fifteen calendar days of

filing the Notice of Appeal. The statement of the evidence must convey a complete and

accurate account of the testimony presented at the hearing. The Workers’ Compensation

Judge must approve the statement of the evidence before the record is submitted to the

Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board must review testimony or other proof concerning

factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be a significant

obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4. After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits

it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties. You have fifteen

calendar days after the date of that notice to file a brief to the Appeals Board. See the Rules

governing the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board on the Bureau’s website

If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the trial court’s Order will

become final by operation of law thirty calendar days after entry. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-

239(c)(7).

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.