Case law

Mobil Oil Corp. v. Director, Division of Taxation

11 N.J. Tax 344 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 24, 1990

Director, 100 N.J. 1 , 494 A.2d 775 (1985); Bendix Corp. v. Taxation Div. Director, 237 N.J.Super. 328 , 568 A.2d 59 (App.Div.1989) (Sup.Ct. appeal pending); International Paper Co. v. Taxation Div. … from its employee who was a member of the Belridge board of directors.

Jones, William v. Transforce, Inc.

2024 TN WC 38 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 25, 2024

Code Ann. § 20-16-101; see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If Transforce meets this burden, Mr. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Opinion No. (2011)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 28, 2011

Cowart v. Piper Aircraft Corp. , 665 P.2d 315 , 317 (Okla. 1983). … Jackson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 16 , 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982).

Bach, Evan v. Lynn Fogleman Construction

2019 TN WC 54 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 5, 2019

Payne v. D and D Elec., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 21, at* 12 (May 4, 2016). Here, Fogleman asserted Mr. … To appeal to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

Andrews v. Custom Foods of America, Inc.

2020 TN WC App. 3 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jan 24, 2020

Gonsewski v. Gonsewski, 350 S.W.3d 99, 105 (Tenn. 2011). … July 31, 2019); McLaurin v. AT&T Services, LLC, No. 2017-03-1133, 2019 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *4-5 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Jan. 31, 2019); Bullard v.

Lake County Trust Co., Trust No. 6, (Flowers from Heaven, Inc.) v. St. Joseph County Assessor

84 N.E.3d 761 · Indiana Tax Court · Oct 17, 2017

STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn a final determination of the Indiana Board bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. … See, e.g., Pulte Homes of Indiana, LLC v. Hendricks Cnty. Assessor, 42 N.E.3d 590, 596 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2015) (affirming dismissal following the Indiana Board’s sua sponte motion to show cause); Muir Woods, Inc. v.

WHITE, WIGELIA v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP.

2026 TN WC 15 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 24, 2026

See Cunningham v. Shelton Sec. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

In re the Estate of Voice

38 Misc. 2d 779 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 22, 1963

Y. 403 ), Amherst College v. Ritch ( 151 N. Y. 282 ) and Oursler v. Armstrong (10 N Y 2d 385). … S. 2d 581; Matter of Brown, 122 N. Y. S. 2d 640) and a gift to a fiduciary, as such, fails if the ultimate testamentary purpose is to be found, not in the will, but in an extraneous paper (Reynolds v. Reynolds, 224 N.

Hagan, Kimberly v. Potomac Corp.

2021 TN WC 243 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 19, 2021

Ibarra v. Amazon Fulfillment Serv., Inc., 2020 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 13, at *5 (Apr. 1, 2020). … Bass v. The Home Depot U.S.A, Inc., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 36, at *9 (May 26, 2017).

Opinion No. (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 29, 1977

Title 80 O.S. 34 .3 [ 80-34.3 ] (1971), provides in part: "The Surplus Property Agent shall have the authority, and it shall be his duty, under the supervision and direction of the State Board of Public Affairs, to ". . . … It was held in the case of Oklahoma Tax Commission, et al. v.

In re Palmer

3 Dem. Sur. 129 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 15, 1885

v. … Co., 41 Mo., 538 ; Brown v. Catholic Mut. Benefit Assoc’n, supra).

Lee v. Wake Cty.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 3, 2005

Lemly v. Colvard Oil Co. , 157 N.C. App. 99 , 577 S.E.2d 712 (2003). … Therefore, under Lemly v.

Opinion No. 70-146 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 28, 1970

In Coca Cola Company v. … In the case of Rice v.

City of Newark v. Block 322, Lots 38 & 40

17 N.J. Tax 103 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 1, 1997

For 1993, a tax appeal was filed, the county board affirmed the assessment, and no further appeal was taken. For the prior years, no appeals were taken. Thus, under N.J.S.A 54:3-21, F.M.C. Stores Co. v. … Blair Academy v. Blairstown Tp., 95 N.J.Super. 583 , 232 A.2d 178 (App.Div.1967), certif. denied 50 N.J. 293 , 234 A.2d 401 (1967); Emanuel Missionary Baptist Church v.

Trustees of Stevens Institute of Technology v. City of Hoboken

1 N.J. Tax 602 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 12, 1980

Sons of Veterans Building Association v. Paterson, 19 N.J.Misc. 106, 17 A.2d 554 (State Board of Tax Appeals 1941). Plaintiff’s claim under the general exemption statute, N.J.S.A. 54:4-3.6 fares no better. … Knox College v. Board of Review, 308 Ill. 160 , 139 N.E. 56 (Sup.Ct. 1923); People ex. rel. Cornell v. Thorne, 184 Misc. 630 , 57 N.Y.S. 2d 6 (Sup.Ct. 1945); Cornell University v.

Cavanaugh v. Lexington Furniture

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Oct 16, 1998

Hansel v. Sherman Textiles, 304 N.C. 44 , 283 S.E.2d 101 (1981). 2. … Booker v. Duke Medical Center , 297 N.C. 458 , 256 S.E.2d 189 (1979). 3.

Dragonfly Holdings LLC v. Multnomah County Assessor

Oregon Tax Court · Nov 27, 2012

Defendant was represented by Jeff Brown (Brown) and Stephanie McQuown (McQuown), both of whom are appraisers with the Multnomah County Assessor’s office. … Allen v. Dept. of Rev., 17 OTR 248, 252 (2003); Gangle v.

Opinion No. 79-244 (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 21, 1979

Prior to and during this time, the Board was receiving funds under the Federal Act; however, all such funds were for statewide pollution programs. … See also Webb v. City of Hugo, 169 Okl. 438 , 37 P.2d 621 (1934). In light thereof, is must be presumed that the Legislature intended the scope of 82 O.S. 934 [82-934](1) to include 1288 area-wide planning funds.

Lagel, Imad v. Elwood Staffing Services, LLC

2018 TN WC 128 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 16, 2018

Willis v. All Staff, 2015 TN. Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 42, at *27 (Nov. 9, 2015). Lay testimony is insufficient to establish causation in the absence of medical evidence. Ariga v. AtWork Pers. Servs., TN Wrk. Comp. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Dennis, Christopher v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water

2019 TN WC 159 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 8, 2019

.: 2018-08-1446 Employee, v. State File No.: 78312-2018 Memphis Light, Gas & Water, Employer. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.