Opinion

Jones, William v. Transforce, Inc.

  • 2024 TN WC 38
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Apr 25, 2024
Status
Published
On the bench
Shaterra Reed Marion
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 15.9%

The opinion

FILED

Apr 25, 2024

11:44 AM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT MEMPHIS

WILLIAM JONES, ) Docket No.: 2022-08-0248

Employee, )

v. )

TRANSFORCE, INC., ) State File No.: 36038-2021

Employer, )

And )

ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE ) Judge Shaterra R. Marion

COMPANY, )

Carrier. )

________________________________________________________________________

COMPENSATION ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Transforce filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. The central issue is whether Mr.

Jones can present sufficient evidence of a causal connection between his employment and

his injury, which is an essential element of his claim. For the reasons below, the Court

holds Mr. Jones did not present the necessary evidence and Transforce is entitled to

summary judgment.

Procedural History

Mr. Jones alleged he suffered a work-related injury to his back in January 2021. He

filed a Petition for Benefit Determination seeking medical, temporary disability, and

permanent disability benefits. At an expedited hearing, the Court denied Mr. Jones’s

request for benefits. Before the expedited hearing, Transforce filed this Motion for

Summary Judgment. Mr. Jones filed no response aside from filing a police report and

medical records.

Facts

Transforce filed a statement of undisputed material facts under Tennessee Rules of

Civil Procedure 56.03. Because Mr. Jones did not respond, none of the facts alleged in

Transforce’s statement was rebutted.

1

The unrebutted material facts are that Mr. Jones selected Dr. Riley Jones from a

panel of physicians. Dr. Jones provided an affidavit saying that he could not state to a

reasonable degree of medical certainty that Mr. Jones’s diagnosis arose primarily out of

and in the course and scope of his employment, considering all possible causes.

Based on these facts, Transforce contends the Court should grant summary

judgment because it negated an essential element of Mr. Jones’s claim. Specifically, it

argues he does not have sufficient expert proof to establish a causal connection between

his employment and his alleged injury.

Law and Analysis

Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to

interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there

is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment

as a matter of law.” Tenn. R. Civ. P. 56.04 (2023).

As the moving party, Transforce must either: (1) submit affirmative evidence that

negates an essential element of Mr. Jones’s claim, or (2) demonstrate that his evidence is

insufficient to establish an essential element of his claim. Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-16-101;

see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn.

2015).

If Transforce meets this burden, Mr. Jones must then show that the record contains

specific facts upon which the Court could base a decision in his favor. Rye, at 265. The

essential element in this case comes from Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-102(12),

which requires expert medical proof that the injury arose primarily out of and in the course

and scope of employment, so that the employment contributed more than 50% in causing

the injury.

Mr. Jones did not respond in writing to oppose Transforce’s motion for summary

judgment. He also did not follow the Rule 56 requirement of responding to the statement

of undisputed material facts. Therefore, the facts are undisputed.

However, the analysis does not stop here, as the Court must determine whether

under Rule 56.06 summary judgment is “appropriate.” Considering the merits of

Transforce’s motion, it successfully demonstrated that Mr. Jones’s evidence is insufficient

to prove medical causation, an essential element of his claim. Dr. Jones said that he could

not state Mr. Jones’s injury arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of his

employment.

During the hearing on the motion, Mr. Jones argues that his work accident definitely

caused his back problem. The Court finds his belief sincere, but the law requires him to

2

“demonstrate the existence of specific facts in the record which could lead a rational trier

of fact to find in [his] favor[.]” Rye, at 265. Mr. Jones did not meet this burden, as he did

not identify any facts.

Thus, no genuine issue of material fact exists as to the question of causation, and

Transforce is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Transforce, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, and Mr. Jones’s claim

is dismissed with prejudice to its refiling.

2. Unless appealed, this order shall become final 30 days after entry.

3. The Court taxes the $150.00 filing fee to Transforce, Inc. under Tennessee

Compilation Rules and Regulations 0800-02-21-.06, payable to the Clerk within

five business days.

4. Transforce, Inc. shall prepare and submit the SD-2 with the Clerk within ten days

of the date of judgment.

ENTERED April 25, 2024.

________________________________________

Judge Shaterra R. Marion

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this Order was sent as indicated on April 25, 2024.

Name U.S. Email Service sent to:

Mail

William Jones, X X 6764 Clarmore Drive

Employee Olive Branch, MS 38654

williamjones202322@gmail.com

Jennifer Thomas, X jdthomas@mijs.com

Employer’s Attorney inhoward@mijs.com

_____________________________________

Penny Shrum, Court Clerk

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

4

Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with the Court’s Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation

Appeals Board. To do so, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled “Notice of Appeal” and file it with the Clerk of the

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims before the expiration of the deadline.

 If the order being appealed is “expedited” (also called “interlocutory”), or if the

order does not dispose of the case in its entirety, the notice of appeal must be filed

within seven (7) business days of the date the order was filed.

 If the order being appealed is a “Compensation Order,” or if it resolves all issues

in the case, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty (30) calendar days of

the date the Compensation Order was filed.

When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy on the opposing party (or attorney,

if represented).

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar

days after filing the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office

or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an

Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office)

seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fully-completed Affidavit of Indigency

within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing

fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of your appeal.

3. You are responsible for ensuring a complete record is presented on appeal. If no court

reporter was present at the hearing, you may request from the Court Clerk the audio

recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If you choose to submit a transcript as part of your

appeal, which the Appeals Board has emphasized is important for a meaningful review of

the case, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript, and you must file it with the

Court Clerk. The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board,

and you will receive notice once it has been submitted. For deadlines related to the filing of

transcripts, statements of the evidence, and briefs on appeal, see the applicable rules on the

Bureau’s website at https://www.tn.gov/wcappealsboard. (Click the “Read Rules” button.)

4. After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits

it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties.

If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the Court Order

becomes enforceable. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(3) (expedited/interlocutory

orders) and Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(7) (compensation orders).

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

Docket No.: ________________________

State File No.: ______________________

Date of Injury: _____________________

___________________________________________________________________________

Employee

v.

___________________________________________________________________________

Employer

Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the

Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date file-

stamped on the first page of the order(s) being appealed):

□ Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ □ Motion Order filed on ___________________

□ Compensation Order filed on__________________ □ Other Order filed on_____________________

issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.

Statement of the Issues on Appeal

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

Parties

Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee

Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________

Email: __________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________

Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee

Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________

Email: _________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________

Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a

true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described

in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this

case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.

______________________________________________

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.