Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.63s
23 B.T.A. 838 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 23, 1931
Burridge v. Beabyl, 1 Pere Wms. 127 (1710); Isenhart v. Brown, 1 Edw. Ch. (N. Y.) 413 (1832) ; Requa v. Graham, 187 Ill. 67 , 58 N. E. 357 , 52 L. R. A. 641 (1900). … Isenhart v. Brown, 1 Edw. Ch. 418 , is quoted in Carper v. Crowl, 149 Ill. 465 ; 36 N. E. 1040 ; and ReQua v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedChristian J. Wurst Iii v. United States
111 Fed. Cl. 683 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 19, 2013
On September 5, 2011, Plaintiff applied for employment with the TVA for the position of Electrical Engineering Design at the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant in Athens, Alabama. Compl. at 7. … United States v. Mitchell, 445 U.S. 535, 538 (1980) (quoting United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 398 (1976)).
Cited 9 timesPublished6 B.T.A. 100 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 9, 1927
United States v. Robbins, 269 U.S. 315 ; 46 Sup.Ct. Rep. 148; Brown v. Brown, 170 Cal. 1 ; 147 Pac. 1168 . … See Gould v. Gould, 245 U.S. 151 ; Audubon v. Shufeldt, 181 U.S. 575 ; and Appeal of David G. Joyce, 3 B.T.A. 393 .
Cited 1 timesPublished20 C.C.P.A. 124 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 23, 1932
Brown, and Albert MacC. Barnes, Jr., to investigate the facts, to take such testimony as might be deemed advisable, and to report the same, with its findings of fact and recommendations to the court. … The above incidents occurred in part during, and in part before and after petitioner’s suspension from practice before the Board of General Appraisers, now the United States Customs Court.
Cited 0 timesPublished7 Cl. Ct. 274 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 17, 1985
Brown v. United States, 2 Cl.Ct. 586 (1983), aff'd 732 F.2d 167 (Fed.Cir.1984); Parker v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 974 (1982); Kestner v. Department of the Interior, 229 Ct.Cl. 772 (1982); Clark v. … Officer is eligible for consideration to LTC, RA, for the first time by the 1975 Board. The court in Bockoven v.
Cited 3 timesPublished135 Ct. Cl. 387 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1956
DeBusk v. United States, 132 C. Cls. 790 . … Brown, the Supply and Fiscal Officer, U. S. Naval. Station, stating the leave tabulation is incorrect.
Cited 8 timesPublishedBoard of Immigration Appeals · Nov 23, 2020
See Robinson v. … District court decisions are generally not binding on the Board. See Matter of K-S-, 20 I&N Dec. 715, 718 (BIA 1993); see also Camreta v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJoel Gott Wines, LLC v. Rehoboth Von Gott, Inc.
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jun 26, 2013
Kirsten Hampton Brown, an employee of opposer. Each deposition transcript is accompanied by attached exhibits. … v.
Cited 0 timesPublished50 Fed. Cl. 225 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 10, 2001
Franconia Assocs. v. United States, 240 F.3d 1358, 1362 (Fed.Cir.2001), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied (Jun 12, 2001); Alder Terrace, Inc. v. United States, 161 F.3d at 1376-77 ; Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. … Bank v. United States, 215 F.3d 1304, 1310 (Fed.Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1070 , 121 S.Ct. 759 , 148 L.Ed.2d 661 (2001); Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedUnited States v. Owatonna Recognition, Inc.
196 F. Supp. 2d 1315 · United States Court of International Trade · Feb 12, 2002
Ltd. v. United States, 18 CIT. 352, 354 (1994). … Corp. v. United States, 73 Cust. Ct. 236, 238, 381 F. Supp. 1403, 1406 (1974).
Cited 0 timesPublishedRCS Enterprises, Inc. v. United States
46 Fed. Cl. 509 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 26, 2000
Co. v. United States, 832 F.2d 574, 579 (Fed.Cir.1987)), and the court may not resort to extrinsic evidence to interpret them, see Interwest Constr. v. Brown, 29 F.3d 611, 615 (Fed.Cir.1994) (citations omitted). … Jan. 24, 2000) (table); Robin Indus., Inc. v. United States, 29 Fed.Cl. 122, 127 (1993) (“Boards of contract appeals have uniformly refused to review the propriety of a VECP rejection.”)
Cited 43 timesPublishedTimkin-Detroit Axle Co. v. Commissioner
21 T.C. 769 · United States Tax Court · Feb 26, 1954
Brown Shoe Co., 45 B. T. A. 212, affd. 133 F. 2d 582 , is distinguishable from the instant case on the same ground. … In reaching the foregoing conclusion we have considered the cases relied on by respondent, including Commissioner v. Batten, Barton, Durstine & Osborn, Inc., (C. A. 2) 171 F. 2d 474 ; Commissioner v. H. W.
Cited 2 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 11, 2018
Plaintiff called Colonel Todd Brown, who operated the Foreign Area Officer training program plaintiff attended in Germany in 2008, as a witness. … In an Officer Evaluation Report completed by Colonel Brown after he had counseled plaintiff, which was included in the record before the Field Board of Inquiry, Colonel Brown stated that plaintiff “is in the top 4 of 10 foreign
Cited 0 timesPublishedKoppers/Clough v. United States
201 Ct. Cl. 344 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 13, 1973
Co. v. United States, 166 Ct. … See the concurring opinion of Judge Brown, stressing that a promise was made to deliver at some time but that the exculpatory clause prohibited any damages for failure to deliver. 333 F. 2d at 781; cf.
Cited 10 timesPublished26 B.T.A. 872 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 18, 1932
The courts and this Board have held that the payments are not income to the widow so long as they do not exceed the value mentioned. Warner v. Walsh, 15 Fed. (2d) 367; United States v. … Beabyl, 1 Pere Wms. 127 (1710) ; Isenhart v. Brown, 1 Edw. Ch. (N. Y.) 413 (1832) ; BeQua v. Graham, 187 Ill. 67 * * * (1900).
Cited 0 timesPublished152 Ct. Cl. 273 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 18, 1961
Following the said hearing, the board recommended that the plaintiff appear before another Physical Evaluation Board. 17. … The case of Morris Brown v. United States, C. Cls.
Cited 7 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 25, 2021
Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1) (conferring jurisdiction over limited categories of cases “not sounding in tort”). … A hearing before the board is a mandatory remedy, meaning that a plaintiff may not bring suit in this Court until the board renders a final decision. See Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct.
Cited 0 timesPublished28 Cont. Cas. Fed. 81,028 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 9, 1981
See Brown v. United States, 175 Ct.Cl. 343 , 358 F.2d 1002 (1966). Even more relevant is an analysis of the facts of this case in light of the statutory purpose. … E.g., Casman v. United States, 135 Ct.Cl. 647 (1956).
Cited 5 timesPublished74 T.C.M. 624 · United States Tax Court · Sep 22, 1997
Memo. 1997-418 UNITED STATES TAX COURT EDGAR AND DORIS BROWN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 25831-95. … Rule 142(a); INDOPCO, Inc. v. Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79, 84 (1992); New Colonial Ice Co. v. Helvering, 292 - 5 - U.S. 435 (1934).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedAgility Logistics Services Company KSC
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Dec 9, 2014
See Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., ASBCA No. 56256, 10-2 BCA i! 34,613 at 170,591. The JCC-I/A was also identified in Block 6 of DD Form 1155 as the "issuer" on a number ofTOs (SOF ii 15). … Laudes Corp. v. United States, 86 Fed. Cl. 152, 161 (2009). Appellant has failed to show such a procurement here.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna