Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.17s
United States v. Tangipahoa Parish School Board
86 F. Supp. 3d 535 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Jan 15, 2015
Doc. 100), and the sole remaining Defendant Tangipahoa Parish School Board (“TPSB”), (Rec. Doc. 103). … Longhi v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · Aug 2, 2023
§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00017 § BROWN, et al., § … Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownSantos v. Frederick County Board of Commissioners
884 F. Supp. 2d 420 · District Court, D. Maryland · Feb 7, 2012
Unlawful Seizure (Counts I and II) The Supreme Court has recognized three distinct types of police-citizen interaction: (i) arrests, which must be supported by probable cause, see Brown v. … Because the Court finds no constitutional violations in the actions of Deputies Openshaw and Lynch, Santos’s claims against the Sheriff Jenkins and the Frederick County Board of Commissioners (Counts V through VII of the
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. Utah · Nov 15, 2022
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH JUSTIN BROWN, … See Murray v. Archambo, 132 F.3d 609, 612 (10th Cir. 1998) (amendment supersedes original).
Cited 0 timesUnknownKicklighter v. McIntosh County Board of Commissioners
162 F. Supp. 3d 1363 · District Court, S.D. Georgia · Feb 19, 2016
Defendant McIntosh County Board of Commissioners Plaintiff also contends that Defendant McIntosh County Board is liable for Defendant Goodrich’s unconstitutional actions. … Defendant McIntosh County Board of Commissioners Plaintiff further contends that Defendant McIntosh County Board is liable for the overtime payments Plaintiff seeks.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 11, 2024
Food & Drug Admin. v. All. for Hippocratic Med., 602 U.S. 367, 380 (2024) (citing Summers v. Earth Island Institute, 555 U.S. 488, 493 (2009) and Lujan v. … Browning v. Levy, 283 F.3d 761, 775 (6th Cir. 2002) (quoting Teledyne Indus., Inc. v. NLRB, 911 F.2d 1214, 1218 (6th Cir. 1990)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownObrecht v. United States Shipping Board
281 F. 352 · District Court, D. Maryland · May 20, 1922
The respondent is named in the libel as the United States Shipping Board, and not as the United States.
Cited 1 timesPublishedToussie v. Town Board of East Hampton
874 F. Supp. 2d 135 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 18, 2012
Harlen Assocs. v. … DiFolco v. MSNBC Cable L.L.C., 622 F.3d 104, 111 (2d Cir.2010) (quoting Mangiafico v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 20, 2024
Nash v. Eberlin, 258 F. App’x 761, 765 n.4 (6th Cir. 2007). So the portion of Brown’s second ground that alleges a sufficiency-of-the-evidence claim is potentially cognizable. Cf. Brown v. … The regime under which Brown was convicted, in which he had the burden to prove self-defense, was constitutional and Brown does not claim otherwise. See Martin v. Ohio, 480 U.S. 228, 233–34 (1987); White v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSmith v. Vestavia Hills Board of Education
218 F. Supp. 3d 1285 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Nov 1, 2016
In Enterprise City Board of Education v. Miller, 348 So.2d 782 (Ala. 1977), this Court held that city boards of education were immune from civil actions. … A city school board’s relation to the city is analogous to a county school board’s relation to the county. State v. Brandon, 244 Ala. 62 , 12 So.2d 319 (1943).
Cited 2 timesPublishedAllen v. Alabama State Board of Education
612 F. Supp. 1046 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jul 3, 1985
Relying on Board of Education of Marshall County v. … Jolly, 362 So.2d 919 (Ala.Civ.App.1978), with Brown v. Board of Education of Blount County, 242 Ala. 154 , 5 So.2d 629 (1942); Jordan v. Baldwin County Board of Education, 373 So.2d 861 (Ala.Civ.App. 1979). 6 .
Vacated on other grounds by Allen v. Alabama State Board of Education, 636 F. Supp. 64 (1986)Cited 16 timesPublishedForemanye v. Board of Community College Trustees
956 F. Supp. 574 · District Court, D. Maryland · Mar 20, 1996
Co., Ltd. v. … The Court also concluded that the College has no independent legal existence and that defendant Board of Community College Trustees for Baltimore County (“the Board”) is the legal entity subject to suit in this case.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 22, 2024
Jolson Susan Brown, Defendant. … See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). Date: October 22, 2024 /s/ Kimberly A.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMorgan v. Sharon Pennsylvania Board of Education
445 F. Supp. 142 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 1978
See Masco v. United Airlines, 13 F.E.P. Cases 1549 (W.D.Pa.1976). … However, it is well established that a School Board is not a person within the meaning of Section 1983. Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 , 81 S.Ct. 473 , 5 L.Ed.2d 492 (1961); Kenosha v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · Oct 24, 2019
) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) TAMMY BROWN, ) By: Hon. … Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 ps. 63, 71 (2003).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · Apr 30, 2018
BROWN, Petitioner, v. … Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and the Petitioner’s right to appeal this Court’s Order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Snyder v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Utah · Mar 9, 2023
On July 13, 2021, Brown attended another public meeting of the Davis School District Board. Id. at ¶ 25. … Defendant John Robison (“Robison”), who was a member of the Davis School Board, noticed that Brown had moved the chairs and asked Plaintiff to return them to their original position. Id.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jul 29, 2025
In Johnson v. … In Allen v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHillman v. Chicago School Reform Board
131 F. Supp. 2d 973 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 2, 2001
The Board moves for summary judgment. I deny the motion in part and grant it in part. Mr. … The question then is whether it is in the “scope” of the complaint, that is, whether it is “like or reasonably related to” the allegations contained in the EEOC complaint, Cheek v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 16, 2024
Defendant Thomas Brown (“Brown”) was driving the other vehicle involved in the collision; at the time of the accident, Brown was acting in the course of his employment with Danny Herman, which owned the vehicle Brown was … E.g., Brown v. Muldrow Pub.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna