The opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT August 02, 2023
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
JEROME JORDAN, §
§
Plaintiff, §
§
VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00017
§
BROWN, et al., §
§
Defendants. §
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
TO DISMISS CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
On June 30, 2023, United States Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton issued a
“Memorandum and Recommendation to Dismiss Case for Failure to Prosecute” (M&R,
D.E. 29). The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the
Magistrate Judge’s M&R. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No.
2002-13. No objections have been timely filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s M&R is filed, the district court
need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the
magistrate judge’s M&R. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005)
(citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the
Magistrate Judge’s M&R (D.E. 29), and all other relevant documents in the record, and
finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the
1 / 2
Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
pursuant to Rule 41(b).
ORDERED on August 2, 2023.
leh GONZAIGS RAMOS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2/2