Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.60s
District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 9, 2024
Petitioner Arnaud Paris and Respondent Heidi Marie Brown are the parents of twin girls, aged nine. … On October 20, 2022, Petitioner filed his first petition for return of the children to France under the Hague Convention in Paris v. Brown, Case No. 1:22-cv-01593- MC (Paris I). That petition was heard by U.S.
Cited 0 timesUnknownPeople's Trust Fed. Credit Union v. Nat'l Credit Union Admin. Bd.
350 F. Supp. 3d 1129 · District Court, D. New Mexico · Oct 29, 2018
Advanced Optics Elecs., Inc. v. Robins , 769 F.Supp.2d 1285 , 1313 (D.N.M. 2010) (Browning, J.). Accord Gerald v. Locksley , 849 F.Supp.2d 1190 , 1209-11 (D.N.M. 2011) (Browning, J.). … By contrast, in Street v. Curry Board of County Commissioners , No.
Cited 41 timesPublishedManfredi v. Mount Vernon Board of Education
94 F. Supp. 2d 447 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 12, 2000
Plaintiff appealed and the Eleventh Circuit reversed, holding that a school board could be liable for student-on-student harassment under Title IX. See Davis v. Monroe Cty. … See *455 Newsday v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedWilliams v. Brunswick County Board of Education
725 F. Supp. 2d 538 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 2, 2010
Lorene Williams (“Williams” or “plaintiff’) filed suit against the Brunswick County Board of Education (“Board” or “defendant”). … If Williams establishes a prima facie case, the Board then must articulate a legitimate non-discriminatory reason for the adverse employment action. See, e.g., Raytheon Co. v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedStrickland v. Lamar County Board of Commissioners
807 F. Supp. 121 · District Court, M.D. Georgia · Nov 25, 1992
Texas State Teachers Ass’n v. Garland Indep. Sch. Dist., 489 U.S. 782, 791-92 , 109 S.Ct. 1486, 1493 , 103 L.Ed.2d 866 (1989) (quoting Nadeau v. Helgemoe, 581 F.2d 275, 278-79 (1st Cir.1978)). … Doe v. Busbee, 684 F.2d 1375, 1379 (11th Cir.1982). Thus, voting rights plaintiffs are eligible for attorney’s fees even when a defendant takes remedial action that moots the lawsuit. Williams v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · Apr 21, 2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 5 AT SEATTLE 6 CLAUDE BROWN … See General 14 Order No. 04-21 (continuing nearly all civil and criminal in-person trials that are scheduled to occur before June 30, 2021); see also Le v. King County, No.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Alaska · Jul 28, 2025
See also Brown, Brion v. Stanley, Matt et al., Case No. 3SW-24-00064CI. … Case No. 3:25-cv-00062-SLG, Brown v. Stanley, et al.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHoblock v. Albany County Board of Elections
233 F.R.D. 95 · District Court, N.D. New York · Dec 5, 2005
See United States Postal Serv. v. Brennan, 579 F.2d 188 , 190 (2d Cir.1978). See also San Juan County, Utah v. … Hoblock v. Albany County Bd. of Elections, 341 F.Supp.2d 169 (N.D.N.Y.2004). . Hoblock v. Albany County Bd. of Elections, 422 F.3d 77 (2d Cir.2005). . See Rooker v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedBaer v. National Board of Medical Examiners
392 F. Supp. 2d 42 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 3, 2005
See Wong v. … Matos v. Clinton Sch.
Cited 10 timesPublishedUnited States v. Board of Education
624 F. Supp. 842 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 9, 1985
As the Board concedes, the Secretary, must play a role in monitoring the Board’s expenditure of federal funds. … Board’s proposed projects and the reasonableness of the Board’s projected costs.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSantos v. Frederick County Board of Commissioners
884 F. Supp. 2d 420 · District Court, D. Maryland · Feb 7, 2012
Unlawful Seizure (Counts I and II) The Supreme Court has recognized three distinct types of police-citizen interaction: (i) arrests, which must be supported by probable cause, see Brown v. … Because the Court finds no constitutional violations in the actions of Deputies Openshaw and Lynch, Santos’s claims against the Sheriff Jenkins and the Frederick County Board of Commissioners (Counts V through VII of the
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · Aug 2, 2023
§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00017 § BROWN, et al., § … Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownKicklighter v. McIntosh County Board of Commissioners
162 F. Supp. 3d 1363 · District Court, S.D. Georgia · Feb 19, 2016
Defendant McIntosh County Board of Commissioners Plaintiff also contends that Defendant McIntosh County Board is liable for Defendant Goodrich’s unconstitutional actions. … Defendant McIntosh County Board of Commissioners Plaintiff further contends that Defendant McIntosh County Board is liable for the overtime payments Plaintiff seeks.
Cited 2 timesPublishedObrecht v. United States Shipping Board
281 F. 352 · District Court, D. Maryland · May 20, 1922
The respondent is named in the libel as the United States Shipping Board, and not as the United States.
Cited 1 timesPublishedThompson v. Mississippi State Personnel Board
674 F. Supp. 198 · District Court, N.D. Mississippi · Oct 5, 1987
In the instant action Bessie Thompson has sued the Mississippi State Personnel Board asserting that the Personnel Board’s requirement that applicants for the position of Supervisor II must have a college degree or two years … Compare Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321, 330 , 97 S.Ct. 2720, 2727 , 53 L.Ed.2d 786, 798 (1977); cf. Williams v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · Jun 26, 2025
He submitted a grievance response from the Administrative Review Board that appears related to his claims. (Doc. 1 at 15). … Romanelli v. Suliene, 615 F.3d 847, 851 (7th Cir. 2010).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 22, 2024
Jolson Susan Brown, Defendant. … See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). Date: October 22, 2024 /s/ Kimberly A.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMorgan v. Sharon Pennsylvania Board of Education
445 F. Supp. 142 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 1978
See Masco v. United Airlines, 13 F.E.P. Cases 1549 (W.D.Pa.1976). … However, it is well established that a School Board is not a person within the meaning of Section 1983. Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 , 81 S.Ct. 473 , 5 L.Ed.2d 492 (1961); Kenosha v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · Apr 30, 2018
BROWN, Petitioner, v. … Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and the Petitioner’s right to appeal this Court’s Order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Snyder v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Utah · Mar 9, 2023
On July 13, 2021, Brown attended another public meeting of the Davis School District Board. Id. at ¶ 25. … Defendant John Robison (“Robison”), who was a member of the Davis School Board, noticed that Brown had moved the chairs and asked Plaintiff to return them to their original position. Id.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna