Case law

Board of Trade v. Milligan

16 F. Supp. 859 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 11, 1936

In the case of Board of Trade of Chicago v. Olsen, 262 U.S. 1 , 43 S.Ct. 470 , 67 L.Ed. 839 , practically identical questions were presented in the challenge there lodged to the constitutionality of that act. … Wallace, 258 U.S. 495, 519 , 42 S.Ct. 397, 403 , 66 L.Ed. 735 , 23 A.L.R. 229 ; Board of Trade of Chicago v. Olsen, 262 U.S. 1, 35 , 43 S.Ct. 470, 476 , 67 L.Ed. 839 ; Tagg Bros. & Moorhead v.

Reed, Wible and Brown, Inc. v. Holder

11 V.I. 715 · District Court, Virgin Islands · Apr 29, 1975

On the days of the 23rd and 24th of April, 1975, an evidentiary hearing was held at which plaintiff Reed, Wible and Brown, Inc., (herein “Reed”) presented evidence and argument on the full merits for a permanent injunction … the foregoing short explanation and upon the findings of facts and conclusions of law which I have previously dictated into the record, it is hereby *718 ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the petition of plaintiff Reed, Wible and Brown

Sun v. Board of Trustees

229 F.R.D. 584 · District Court, C.D. Illinois · Aug 8, 2005

Plaintiff relies on Tango Music v. DeadQuick Music, 348 F.3d 244 (7th Cir.2003). … See Dunphy v. McKee, 134 F.3d 1297 (7th Cir.1998); Ball v. City of Chicago, 2 F.3d 752 (7th Cir.1993).

Brown v. 1995 TENET PARAAMERICA BICYCLE CHALLENGE

959 F. Supp. 496 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 13, 1997

Brown relies on Carparts Distrib. Ctr. v. … Beam v. IPCO Corp., 838 F.2d 242, 244 (7th Cir.1988). Accordingly, Mr. Brown’s Rehabilitation Act claim will not be dismissed.

H. J. Justin & Sons, Inc. v. Brown

519 F. Supp. 1383 · District Court, E.D. California · Aug 21, 1981

Church of Scientology v. U. S. Dept. of Justice, 612 F.2d 417, 421 (9th Cir. 1979). … In Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona ex rel.

United States v. Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.

800 F. Supp. 2d 143 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 3, 2011

Wilson v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 525 F.3d 370, 373-74 (4th Cir.2008) (explaining and interpreting the LOGCAP contract in a different dispute); United States ex rel. McBride v. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002).

Erskine v. Board of Education

197 F. Supp. 2d 399 · District Court, D. Maryland · Apr 22, 2002

Seemuller v. Fairfax County School Board, 878 F.2d 1578, 1581 (4th Cir.1989), citing Rankin v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378 , 107 S.Ct. 2891 , 97 L.Ed.2d 315 (1987). … Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 *407 U.S. 532, 538, 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985), citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576-578 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

Barkey v. Firearms Control Board

293 F. Supp. 420 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 25, 1968

The New York state courts have held the New York City Firearms Control Law constitutional, and we would agree with that conclusion: New York Sporting Arms Ass’n v. … Ct., N.Y.Co.; Grimm v. City of New York, 56 Misc.2d 525 , 289 N.Y.S.2d 358 (Sup.Ct., Queens Co.1968). . Alabama Pub. Serv. Comm. v.

Bush v. Orleans Parish School Board

187 F. Supp. 42 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Aug 29, 1960

set forth by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Brown v. … Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 .

Goss v. Board of Education

320 F. Supp. 549 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 1, 1970

After the mandate in Brown v. … The Brown mandate, supra, as applied by this Court in 1967, Goss v. Board of Education, 270 F.Supp. 903 , and as modified by the 1968 school cases, Green v.

MARQUEZ v. CHEF VOLA, INC.

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 23, 2022

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 665 A.2d 1139 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1995)). … V.

Cellco Partnership v. Board of Supervisors

140 F. Supp. 3d 548 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Oct 22, 2015

Summers v. Earth Island Institute, 555 U.S. 488, 493 , 129 S.Ct. 1142 , 173 L.Ed.2d 1 (2009) (quoting Warth v. … See AT & T Wireless PCS, Inc. v.

Kauder v. United Board & Carton Corporation

199 F. Supp. 420 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 15, 1961

See Brown v. Bullock, 194 F.Supp. 207, 231 (S.D.N.Y.1961) ; aff’d 294 F.2d 415 (2 Cir.); 2 Loss, Securities Regulation 932 et seq. (2d Ed. 1961). I. … See Mack v. Mishkin, supra; but cf. Dann v. Studebaker-Packard Corp., 288 F.2d 201, 215 (6 Cir. 1961), cited in Brown v. Bullock, supra at 418 .

Brown v. Goodwill Indus. of E. N.C., Inc.

361 F. Supp. 3d 558 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 2, 2019

Corp. v. Twombly , 550 U.S. 544 , 554-63, 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) ; Coleman v. Md. … Massey v. Ojaniit , 759 F.3d 343 , 352 (4th Cir. 2014) ; see Clatterbuck v. City of Charlottesville , 708 F.3d 549 , 557 (4th Cir. 2013), abrogated on other grounds by Reed v.

Maxie v. Brown & Brown, Inc.

District Court, D. South Carolina · Mar 15, 2022

)   ) Brown & Brown, Inc., and ) Brown & … Plaintiff was employed by Defendant Brown & Brown of South Carolina (“BBSC”).

Wasnowic v. Chicago Board of Trade

352 F. Supp. 1066 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 1972

C. v. Howey, supra, 328 U.S. at 298 , 66 S.Ct. at 1103 . And, in Tcherepnin v. … See Milnarik v. M-S Commodities, supra 320 F.Supp. at 1150 ; Anderson v. Francis I. duPont & Co., supra 291 F.Supp. at 707 .

ZIGLER v. WARREN

District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 28, 2022

West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988). … Pa. 2013) (noting that although this standard typically applies to municipal entities, it “applies with equal force to supervisory liability claims premised on a ‘policy, practice, or custom’ theory” (citing Brown v.

(HC) Fields v. California Department of Corrections

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 5, 2020

Ylst v. … See People v. Superior Court (Romero), 13 6 Cal. 4th 497, 508 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. Mayle, 283 F.3d 1019, 1040 (9th Cir. 2002) (vacated and 7 remanded on other grounds in Mayle v.

M.L. v. Board of Education of Bourbon County

District Court, E.D. Kentucky · Sep 4, 2025

Mich. 2015) (making the case that the IDEA exhaustion requirement is not jurisdictional despite Metropolitan Board of Public Education v. … Public Interest M.L. contends that the “denial of equal access to a public entity due to a protected class is and has been an interest of the public since Brown v Board

Jones v. Board of Trustees

197 F.R.D. 363 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 3, 2000

Martin v. United States, 931 F.2d 453, 455 (7th Cir.1991); Barnett v. City of Chicago, 1999 WL 138813 , *5 (N.D.Ill.1999)(prevailing party can recover only for one copy to court and copy to opponent). … Uniroyal Good *365 rich Tire Co. v. Mutual Trading Corporation, 1994 WL 605719 , *4 (N.D.Ill.1994).