Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersuscfc

6,911 results

0.48s

  • Smith v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 28, 2021

    Mallori Browne Openchowski,1 U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. … See, e.g., Doe 34 v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 87 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Briggs v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 12, 2022

    See Sabella v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 86 Fed. … Scott Worswick, a board-certified dermatologist. Fees App. Ex. 3 at 2. The undersigned has reviewed the requested costs and finds them to be reasonable and supported with appropriate documentation.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Wells Fargo & Co. & Subsidiaries v. United States

    91 Fed. Cl. 35 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 8, 2010

    See Mayer Brown LLP v. I.R.S., 562 F.3d 1190, 1194 (D.C.Cir.2009) (Freedom of Information Act appeal denying law firm’s request for IRS settlement guidelines in LILO transactions). … ACM P’ship v. Comm’r, 157 F.3d 231, 259 (3rd Cir.1998); see also United States v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Gulley v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 19, 2020

    Topping v. United States, 2016 WL 3606059, at *7 (Fed. Cl. June 29, 2016); see Brown v. United States, 2014 WL 3686140, at *3 (Fed. Cl. July 16, 2014), aff’d, 607 F. App’x 983, 984 (Fed. … Co. v. United States, 704 F.3d 949, 954 (Fed. Cir. 2013); see also Drury v. United States, 52 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stockton East Water District and Central San Joaquin Water Conservation District v. United States

    109 Fed. Cl. 760 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 28, 2013

    Water Dist. v. … Thompson, Chairman of Central’s Board of Directors; and (5) Dr. Rodney T. Smith, President of Stratecon, Inc., and an expert in California water markets.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Olson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 7, 2024

    See Petitioner’s Reply Brief in Support of Damages at 12-13. 6 of 43.9 hours, or $18,440.00) by twenty percent.12 Such an across-the-board reduction (which I am empowered … See, e.g., Abbott v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 135 Fed. Cl. 107, 111 (2017); Raymo v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs, 129 Fed. Cl. 691, 702-704 (2016); Sabella v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 86 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • SIPCO Services & Marine Inc. v. United States

    42 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,277 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 17, 1998

    Fortec Constructors v. United States, 760 F.2d 1288, 1291 (Fed.Cir.1985) (citing Newsom v. United States, 676 F.2d 647, 649-50 , 230 Ct.Cl. 301 (1982); FFR Building Specialties v. … (CCH) P 15,817 (1982) "(Where the contract at issue did not contain a clause defining the COTR's responsibility, the Board said: ‘the Court of Claims and this Board have ruled that where the contract or the contracting officer

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Calohan v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 2, 2025

    Shah * v. … Feb. 10, 2005) (finding no reasonable basis when petitioner submitted an affidavit and no other records); Brown v. Sec’y Health & Hum. Servs., No. 99-539V, 2005 WL 1026713, *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Pacetti v. United States

    50 Fed. Cl. 239 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 10, 2001

    Baker v. … Warth v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Flores v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 30, 2021

    Florsheim Shoe Co., Div. of Interco v. United States, 744 F.2d 787, 795 (Fed. Cir. 1984) (citing National Labor Relations Board v. Federbush Co., 121 F.2d 954, 957 (2d Cir. 1941) (Hand, J.)). … Max v. Gen.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. United States

    125 Fed. Cl. 678 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 14, 2016

    Power Co. v. United States, 119 Fed. … In System Fuels, Inc. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Lopez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 15, 2020

    Moran * v. … Machuca v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 20-18V, 2020 WL 4670877 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. July 17, 2020).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Callejas v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 27, 2023

    Such an across-the-board reduction (which I am 11 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(c)(10)(iii) (2017) (regarding the location of a petitioner’s pain and suffering and limited range of motion). 12 This decision can be f ound on the … See, e.g., Abbott v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 135 Fed. Cl. 107, 111 (2017); Raymo v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs, 129 Fed. Cl. 691, 702-704 (2016); Sabella v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 86 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Voeller v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · May 3, 2024

    Servs., No. 20-0851V at ECF No. 30; Clappe-Mixell v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 19-1538V at ECF No. 36; Black v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 20-0777V at ECF No. 24; Miller v. … Such an across-the-board reduction (which I am empowered to adopt)10 fairly captures the overbilling evidenced by this work, without requiring me to act as a “green eye-shaded accountant” in identifying with specificity each

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Luna v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 3, 2025

    Shah * v. … Feb. 10, 2005) (finding no reasonable basis when petitioner submitted an affidavit and no other records); Brown v. Sec’y Health & Hum. Servs., No. 99-539V, 2005 WL 1026713, *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • It Enterprise Solutions Jv, LLC v. United States

    132 Fed. Cl. 158 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 27, 2017

    V. … Grp., Inc. v. United States, 649 F.3d. 1320, 1331 n.1 (Fed. Cir. 2011); see also Univ. Research Co., LLC v. United States, 65 Fed.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Dellew Corporation v. United States

    127 Fed. Cl. 85 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 20, 2016

    WHR Grp., Inc. v. United States, 121 Fed. Cl. 673, 676 (2015) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A)-(B)). The term “prevailing party” is not defined in the EAJA. In Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. … Schuenemeyer v. United States, 776 F.2d 329, 333 (Fed. Cir. 1985); accord Fritz v. Principi, 264 F.3d 1372, 1377 (Fed. Cir. 2001); Brewer v. Am. Battle Monuments Comm’n, 814 F.2d 1564 (Fed. Cir. 1987).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Doherty v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 10, 2022

    Id. at 1347-58 (citing Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 888 (1984)). … Steinman is board certified in psychiatry and neurology and he has chaired the neuro- immunology program at Stanford University Medical Center. Pet. Ex. 23 at 1-2. Dr.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Meyers v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 27, 2023

    Riggins v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. … Such an across-the-board reduction (which I am empowered to adopt) 11 fairly captures the overbilling evidenced by this work, without requiring me to act as a “green eye-shaded accountant” in identifying with specificity

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Smith v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · May 1, 2024

    Such an across-the-board reduction (which I am empowered to adopt)11 fairly captures the overbilling evidenced by this work, without requiring me to act as a “green eye-shaded accountant” in identifying with specificity each … See, e.g., Abbott v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 135 Fed. Cl. 107, 111 (2017); Raymo v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs, 129 Fed. Cl. 691, 702-704 (2016); Sabella v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 86 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.