Case law

Smith v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 23, 2024

Joseph Rizzo who is double board-certified in neurology and ophthalmology a rate of $650 per hour); Montague v. Sec’y of HHS, No. 16-0298V, 2018 WL 5284594 at *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. … Thomas Wright who board-certified in orthopedics a rate of $600 per hour). Higher rates are deemed reasonable when an expert demonstrates a specific expertise. See Nwala v. Sec’y of Health & Hum.

Terex Corp. v. United States

104 Fed. Cl. 525 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 4, 2012

As the Supreme Court recognized in Kleppe v. … See also Marsh v. Oregon Natural Res.

Hunt v. United States

52 Fed. Cl. 810 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 10, 2002

Murphy v. … Paalan v. United States, 51 Fed.Cl. 738, 743 (2002) (citing Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322 , 326 n. 5, 99 S.Ct. 645 , 58 L.Ed.2d 552 (1979) and Mother’s Restaurant, Inc. v.

Gritter-Francona, Inc v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 31, 2022

The Proposals & Source Selection Evaluation Board’s Evaluations A total of twelve proposals were received in response to the solicitation. AR 62-3931. … Am., Inc. v. United States, 880 F.3d 1326, 1332 (Fed.

Anchor Savings Bank, FSB v. United States

81 Fed. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 14, 2008

Id.; see also Robert V. … Bank, FSB v.

Beckmann v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 5, 2024

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. … I incorporate herein 2 my prior discussion in Sections V - VII of Crawford v. Sec'y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 19-0544V, 2024 WL 1045147, at *20-22 (Fed. Cl.

Engineered Maintenance Services, Inc. v. United States

55 Fed. Cl. 637 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 20, 2003

Danzig v. AEC Corp., 224 F.3d 1333, 1336 (Fed.Cir.2000); Morganti Nat’l, Inc. v. United States, 49 Fed.Cl. 110, 129 (2001). … Co. v.

Gadsden Industrial Park, LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · May 18, 2018

Loerch v. Nat’l Bank of Commerce of Birmingham, 624 So. 2d 552, 553 (Ala. 1993); see also Homes of Legend, Inc. v. … Drummond Co., Inc. v.

Edwards v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 10, 2014

Special Devices, Inc. v. OEA, Inc., 269 F.3d l340, 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2001); Miller v. U.S. Postal Serv., 231 Ct. Cl. 804, 809 (1982). … Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed. Cir. 1997)(¢11;111,<; 28 U.s.c. § 1491(@1)). For the reasons set forth above, this Court lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of Mr. Edwards’ complaint.

Diversified Maintenance Systems, Inc. v. United States

110 Fed. Cl. 612 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 26, 2013

Cir. 2012) ("Ifa Rule 12(b)(1) 3’ Unlike the proceeding involved when an "appeal" of a CO decision is taken to an agency board under 41 U.S.C. § 7105, bringing an action directly on the claim in the United States Court of … Ruz`z Assocs., Inc. v. United States, 94 Fed.

Abbott Laboratories v. United States

84 Fed. Cl. 96 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 24, 2008

Board of Comm’rs, 435 U.S. 110, 134 , 98 S.Ct. 965 , 55 L.Ed.2d 148 (1978) (“[wjhen a Congress that re-enacts a statute voices its approval of an administrative or other interpretation thereof, Congress is treated as having … Whitman v. Am. Trucking Ass'ns, 531 U.S. 457, 466 , 121 S.Ct. 903 , 149 L.Ed.2d 1 (2001); see also FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132-33 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000). .

Ocansey v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 11, 2021

Ocansey asked the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (“AFBCMR” or “the Board”) to change the narrative reason for her discharge (originally identified as “Unsuitability—Personality Disorder”) to instead reflect … She does not challenge the Board’s decision to correct her record. See generally id.

Hansen v. United States

65 Fed. Cl. 76 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 11, 2005

See, e.g., Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1997) (“The Court of Federal Claims is a court of limited jurisdiction. It lacks jurisdiction *96 over tort actions against the United States.”). … See the discussion of Justice Brown’s concurring opinion in United States v. Lynah, 188 U.S. 445 , 23 S.Ct. 349 , 47 L.Ed. 539 (1903), below. . Compare John F.

Ligouri v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 9, 2021

MARY LIGOURI, * * * Filed: April 15, 2021 Petitioner, * * v … Peter-Brian Andersson, a board-certified neurologist, which addressed Petitioner’s symptoms prior to her January 3, 2018 vaccination. Ex. 17.

C.H. Guernsey & Co. v. United States

65 Fed. Cl. 582 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 29, 2005

Co. v. … See Massie v.

Caldwell v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 30, 2025

See, e.g., 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1); see also Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (“The Court of Federal Claims is a court of limited jurisdiction.”). … Innovair Aviation Ltd. v. United States, 632 F.3d 1336, 1344 (Fed. Cir. 2011); Jones v. United States, 440 F. App’x 916, 918 (Fed. Cir. 2011); Joshua v. United States, 17 F.3d 378, 380 (Fed. Cir. 1994); see also Vehr v.

Stone Forest Industries, Inc. v. United States

39 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,719 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 19, 1994

Foley Co. v. United States, 11 F.3d 1032, 1034 (Fed.Cir. 1993); Gould, Inc. v. United States, 935 F.2d 1271, 1274 (Fed.Cir.1991); Fry Communications, Inc. v. United States, 22 Cl.Ct. 497, 503 (1991). … Arizona v.

Advance Bank v. United States

52 Fed. Cl. 286 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 18, 2002

Co. v. … See Loral Corp. v.

United International Investigative Services, Inc. v. United States

56 Fed. Cl. 619 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 28, 2003

Although parties to a contract are generally bound by its terms, Giesler v. … See Paccon, Inc. v.

D & S Consultants, Inc. v. United States

101 Fed. Cl. 23 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 14, 2011

Id. at *6 n. 8 (second alteration in original) (quoting source selection board’s decision) (internal quotation marks omitted). … Ashbritt, Inc. v.