Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
0.54s
115 Fed. Cl. 102 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 5, 2014
Schnell submitted an Application for Correction of Military Records to the Board for the Correction ofNaval Records (.' … Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 u.s-232,236 (1974), abrogated on other qrounds by Harlow v. Fitzeerald,45T u.s. g00 (1982).
Cited 10 timesPublished99 Fed. Cl. 695 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 29, 2011
See Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed.Cir.1997) (“Bi *698 vens actions ... lie outside the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims.”); see also Pendleton v. … See, e.g., Le Blanc v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedLinda Newman Construction Co. v. United States
48 Fed. Cl. 231 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 13, 2000
Henry v. United States, 870 F.2d 634, 637 (Fed.Cir.1989); Hanson v. OPM, 833 F.2d 1568, 1569 (Fed.Cir.1987). … Mukherjee v. INS, 793 F.2d 1006, 1009 (9th Cir.1986); see also OPM v.
Cited 5 timesPublished40 Fed. Cl. 67 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 6, 1998
Craft v. … In Laningham v.
Cited 3 timesPublished104 Fed. Cl. 278 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 30, 2012
United States, 63 Fed.Cl. 475, 476 (2005) (holding that the United States Court of Federal Claims does not have jurisdiction over statutory civil rights claims); Brown v. *283 United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed.Cir.1997 … v.
Cited 16 timesPublished127 Fed. Cl. 664 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 27, 2016
Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 1 Plaintiffalso lists as defendants: "Renee Brown, Deputy Chief[,] Navy, IHEODTD Contracting Office … Before filing a complaint in this court, plaintiff had filed a similar complaintwith the United States Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA), alleging substantially the same claims, but seeking a different amount
Cited 7 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 11, 2025
Brown v. United States, 22 F.4th 1008, 1012 (2022) (quoting Gregory v. United States, 149 Fed. Cl. 719, 723 (2020)). In making this determination, the Circuit relied on language found in Title 26, §§ 6061(a) and 6065. … Dixon v. United States, 67 F.4th 1156, 1160 (2023) (quoting Brown, 22 F.4th at 1012).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMonterey Consultants, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 29, 2022
Systems, Inc. v. … See Wood & Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTender Years Learning Corporation v. United States
128 Fed. Cl. 265 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 12, 2016
Tender Years maintains that it did, in fact, have a board, and that it would have had the necessary qualified staff if HHS had not earlier prevented it from contacting Macon Bibb employees. Id. ¶¶ 26.b-c. … Wurst v. United States, 111 Fed. Cl. 683, 685 (2013) (quoting Henke v. United States, 60 F.3d 795, 797 (Fed. Cir. 1995)).
Cited 3 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 13, 2025
Strong filed an appeal at the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). Id. at 34 [¶7]. Mr. Strong and his office signed a settlement agreement less than two months later, on July 15, 2022. Id. at 36. … Id. at 454; Worthington v. United States, 168 F.3d 24, 26-7 (Fed. Cir. 1999) (“[W]here the Board has jurisdiction over a claim, this court has held that the Claims Court does not.”). Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMansoor International Development Services, Inc. v. United States
121 Fed. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 11, 2015
Pl.’s Mot. to Consolidate Appeal with Appeals Pending Before the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, ECF No. 10. … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678, (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)).
Cited 6 timesPublishedRice Systems, Inc. v. United States
62 Fed. Cl. 608 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 29, 2004
A contemporaneous record of the alleged threats would have strengthened the plausibility of Brown’s allegations. … See Fields v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDavis Wetlands Bank, LLC v. United States
114 Fed. Cl. 113 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 16, 2013
Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 563 (2007). … A good example is found in D & N Bank, where a Bank Board Resolution was deemed not to be a product of negotiation between the two parties, but only a memorialization of the Board’s approval of a merger between D & N Bank
Cited 4 timesPublished29 Fed. Cl. 764 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 29, 1993
Bell v. United States, 23 Cl.Ct. 73, 78 (1991); Santora v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 182, 185 (1985). … (citing Davis v. Veterans Admin., 792 F.2d 1111, 1113 (Fed.Cir.1986)).
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · May 21, 2026
Denton v. … Walby v. United States, 144 Fed. Cl. 1, 10 (2019), aff’d, 957 F.3d 1295 (Fed. Cir. 2020); Brown v. United States, 35 Fed. Cl. 258, 268 (1996), aff’d, 105 F.3d 621 (Fed. Cir. 1997). Ms.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 8, 2022
See Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (“The Tucker Act grants the Court of Federal Claims jurisdiction over suits against the United States, not against individual federal officials.”). … .’”); Brown, 105 F.3d at 623 (“[T]he Fourth Amendment does not mandate the payment of money for its violation.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 22, 2021
United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. 206, 217 (1983) (quoting United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 400 (1976)); see also Reynolds v. Army & Air Force Exch. Serv., 846 F.2d 746, 748 (Fed. Cir. 1988). … Brown v. United States, 74 Fed. Cl. 546, 550 (2006) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1631).”
Cited 0 timesPublished40 Fed. Cl. 313 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 9, 1998
Co. v. … In Markman v.
Cited 6 timesPublished124 Fed. Cl. 684 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 6, 2016
See 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (b)(1); see also Brown v. … .”); Hayes v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedStandard Federal Bank v. United States
62 Fed. Cl. 265 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 9, 2004
Prior to the execution of the Assistance Agreement and the Merger Agreement, the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (Bank Board) issued three resolutions approving Heritage’s merger with Family Federal. … Resolution 86-1141 authorized the Secretary of the Bank Board to issue a forbearance letter to Heritage regarding supervisory forbearance by the Bank Board and the FSLIC of certain regulatory requirements.
Cited 10 timesPublished
Ask Donna