Case law

Steele v. Staffmark Investments, LLC

172 F. Supp. 3d 1024 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Mar 23, 2016

Bank v. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v.

Goff v. Madison County, Tennessee

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jan 3, 2020

Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 612, 613 (6th Cir. … LaFountain v. Harry, 716 F.3d 944, 951 (6th Cir. 2013); see also Brown v. R.I., 511 F.

Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe

309 F. Supp. 1189 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Feb 26, 1970

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND JUDGMENT BAILEY BROWN, Chief Judge. … Nashville I-40 Steering Committee v. Ellington, *1192 387 F.2d 179 (6th Cir.1967) and South Hill Neighborhood Ass'n, Inc., et al. v. Romney et al., 421 F.2d 455 (6th Cir. decided November 24, 1969).

Harris v. Hutson

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Dec 21, 2021

Lastly, Plaintiff’s Complaint clearly sues a state agency, the Tennessee Board of Cosmetology (“Board”), and therefore the Eleventh Amendment likely bars her claims under the doctrine of state sovereign immunity. … Though Plaintiff alleges the hearing held by the Board denied her due process, she admits the Board provided her with a hearing and opportunity to be heard in December. (ECF No. 1 at PageID 12.)

Harris v. Madison County

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Dec 19, 2019

Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 612, 613 (6th Cir. … LaFountain v. Harry, 716 F.3d 944, 951 (6th Cir. 2013); see also Brown v. R.I., 511 F.

Hayes v. Memphis City Police Department

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Aug 14, 2019

Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 612, 613 (6th Cir. … LaFountain v. Harry, 716 F.3d 944, 951 (6th Cir. 2013); see also Brown v. R.I., 511 F.

Jenkins-Parks v. First Horizon Bank

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jul 14, 2025

Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989), and the court cannot create a claim that has not been spelled out in a pleading, see Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. … Brown v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 507 F. App'x 543, 547 (6th Cir. 2012) (citing Boggio, 696 F.3d at 615-16).

Porch, III v. Quality Correctional Health Care

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Aug 22, 2019

Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 612, 613 (6th Cir. … LaFountain v. Harry, 716 F.3d 944, 951 (6th Cir. 2013); see also Brown v. R.I., 511 F.

Greer, Sr. v. Madison County Sheriff's Department

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Oct 7, 2019

Because Plaintiff Cole 1 On October 2, 2019, the Court severed the claims of Plaintiffs Moore, Taylor and Brown. (ECF No. 13 at PageID 40.) … McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 607 (6th Cir. 1997), partially overruled on other grounds by LaFountain v. Harry, 716 F.3d 944, 951 (6th Cir. 2013); cf.

Yetto v. City of Jackson, Tennessee

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jun 28, 2019

V § 2, provides, in relevant part: Following public notice and hearing and subject to appropriate conditions and safeguards, the Board of Zoning Appeals may permit, as special exceptions: 1. … Cohen v. Cohen, 937 S.W.2d 823, 833 n. 12 (Tenn. 1996); Altman v. Altman, 181 S.W.3d 676, 680-81 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).

Cupp v. Alberto-Culver USA, Inc.

308 F. Supp. 2d 873 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Mar 16, 2004

Defendant did not hold any meeting of its board of directors or shareholders anywhere in the United States during the relevant time period. … For example, in Third Nat’l Bank in Nashville v.

Nasar v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Nov 15, 2019

Brown, 393 S.W.3d at 704 (quoting Bain v. Wells, 936 S.W.2d 618, 622-23 (Tenn. 1997)). … Brown v. Christian Bros. Univ., 428 S.W.3d 38, 54 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013) (quoting Coffee v. Peterbilt of Nashville, Inc., 795 S.W.2d 656, 659 (Tenn. 1990)).

United States v. Shelby County, Tennessee

385 F. Supp. 1187 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Oct 10, 1974

Chester County Board of Assessment and Revision of Taxes, 281 F.Supp. 1001, 1004 (E.D.Pa.1968). … See Farrar v. Nashville C. & St. L. Ry., 162 Tenn. 313, 319 , 36 S.W.2d 95, 97 (1931) citing 21 A.L.R. 1089 and 66 L.R.A. 42 ; Kenneally v. Standard Electronics Co., 364 F.2d 642, 646 (8th Cir. 1966).

Lawler v. Hardeman County, Tennessee

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Sep 29, 2022

Dominguez v. Corr. Med. Servs., 555 F. 3d 543, 549 (6th Cir. 2009).17 16 Plaintiff has sued Doolen and Brown in both their individual and official capacities as officials of Hardeman County. … Trozzi v.

Long v. Jackson

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jun 6, 2019

Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 612, 613 (6th Cir. … LaFountain v. Harry, 716 F.3d 944, 951 (6th Cir. 2013); see also Brown v. R.I., 511 F.

Pigram v. CITY OF MEMPHIS (MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT)

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jan 24, 2025

(quoting Board of County Com'rs of Bryan Cnty, Okla. v. Brown, 520 U. S. 397, 404 (1997)). To satisfy the burden of showing a custom or policy, a plaintiff must provide specific facts to support the claim. … See Huffer v. Bogen, 503 F.

Federal Compress & Warehouse Co. v. United States

319 F. Supp. 917 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Nov 24, 1970

Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. F. C. C., 316 U.S. 4, 10 , 62 S.Ct. 875 , 86 L.Ed. 1229 (1941). … Judicial review of an administrative board conclusion is also based upon a consideration of whether it has a rational basis and is supported by substantial evidence. Gilbertville Trucking Co. v. U.

Vasconez v. Langston Companies, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · May 25, 2021

VASCONEZ, Plaintiff, v. … Nafziger v. McDermott Int’l, Inc., 467 F.3d 514, 522 (6th Cir. 2006).

Scanlan v. Bonner

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jan 2, 2025

Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. … v.

Sandlin v. Citimortgage, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Mar 26, 2021

Brown v. Bd. of Educ., 47 F. Supp. 3d 665, 674 (W.D. Tenn. 2014); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The court “may also receive evidence or recommit the matter to the [m]agistrate [j]udge with instructions.” Moses v. … Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). A district judge should adopt the findings and rulings of the magistrate judge to which no specific objection is filed. Brown, 47 F. Supp. 3d at 674.