Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,304 results
1.47s
Maury County, Tennessee v. City of Columbia, Tennessee
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · May 16, 2025
See Arnold v. Arnold Corp-Printed Comm. for Business, 920 F.2d 1269, 1277-78 (6th Cir. 1990) (citing Prima Paint v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. … Here, there is no question that the parties, via their respective utility boards, entered into an agreement to arbitrate certain disputes.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · May 8, 2023
Pittman v. Experian Info. Sols., Inc., 901 F.3d 619, 627-28 (6th Cir. 2018) (quoting Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986)). … See Brown v. VHS of Michigan, Inc., 545 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · Mar 6, 2023
In Herrera v. … No. 82 at 5 (citing United States v. Brown, 62 F.3d 1418 (Table), No. 94–5917, 1995 WL 465802, (6th Cir. 1995) (citing Reed v. Farley, 512 U.S. 339, 353-54 (1994))).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · Apr 15, 2026
See Allis- Chalmers Corp. v. … . § 160(b), which governs unfair labor practices before the National Labor Relation Board, applies to Section 301 claims. 461 U.S. at 164-65.
Cited 0 timesUnknownFlynn v. Crossville Housing Authority (TV1)
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Oct 26, 2021
EEOC v. Prevo's Fam. … .”); Kennedy v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · Apr 8, 2025
Petitioner has also written the Tennessee Board of Professional Responsibility three times to complain about his counsel’s lack of attention to his case. (Id.) … See Gully v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownRobinson v. Serra Chevrolet Buick GMC of Nashville
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Aug 22, 2022
A review board at Credit Acceptance determined that the contract was valid. (Doc. No. 1.) … Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985); Cowherd v. Million, 380 F.3d 909, 912 (6th Cir. 2004).
Cited 0 timesUnknown949 F. Supp. 2d 777 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jun 12, 2013
See Toth v. … See Hutto v.
Reversed on other grounds by Occupy Nashville v. William Haslam, 769 F.3d 434 (2014)Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jul 27, 2020
Anderson v. … Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 484 (1995); see, e.g., Vitek v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · Apr 17, 2023
Board v. Bradshaw, 805 F.3d 769, 772 (6th Cir. 2015) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). … See Davis v. Bradshaw, 900 F.3d 315, 323 (6th Cir. 2018) (citing Pace v. DiGuglielmo, 544 U.S. 408, 413 (2005); Vroman, 346 F.3d at 603)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · Apr 11, 2023
Plaintiff brings this case against: RMSI employees Warden Tony Mays, Sergeant Linda Stokes, Officer Michael Jemeyson, and an unnamed alternate grievance board … Williams v. Curtin, 631 F.3d 380, 383 (6th Cir. 2011) (quoting Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 681 (2009)).
Cited 0 timesUnknown356 F. Supp. 2d 856 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Feb 2, 2005
United States v. … Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 , 34 S.Ct. 341 , 58 L.Ed. 652 (1914). Of course, such evidence is not automatically subject to suppression under the exclusionary rule. Brown v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedYale University v. Fisk University
660 F. Supp. 16 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Oct 1, 1985
Bell reported this to the Fisk Board of Trust, and the Fisk administration acquiesced in this position. Fisk’s library card catalog for the Toomer Collection states that the collection was deposited at Fisk. … Hengst v. Hengst, 491 Pa. 120 , 420 A.2d 370, 371 (1980). It is the duty of the donee to establish these elements by clear, precise, direct, and convincing evidence.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · Dec 28, 2023
See Bell Atlantic Corp. v. … Brown v. Donco Enterprises, Inc., 783 F.2d 644, 646 (6th Cir. 1986). Based on the allegations already discussed, Defendants’ argument is unpersuasive.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCrossville, Inc. v. Kemper Design Center, Inc.
758 F. Supp. 2d 517 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Dec 14, 2010
Co. v. … Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 , 106 S.Ct. 1348 , 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986); Brown v. United States, 583 F.3d 916, 919 (6th Cir.2009). 2 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedWebb v. Republican Party of Cumberland County TN
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Oct 3, 2024
Prather v. … Porter v. Brown, 289 F. App’x 114, 116 (6th Cir. 2008). “[T]he accrual date of a § 1983 cause of action is a question of federal law that is not resolved by reference to state law.” Wallace v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jun 1, 2026
Brown v. Page, No. 2:20-cv-00070, 2021 WL 288754, at *3 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 27, 2021) (finding plaintiff had stated viable First Amendment and RLUIPA claims based on restricted access to Bible). … See Haight v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJRS Partners, GP v. Leech Tishman Fuscaldo & Lampl, LLC
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Oct 2, 2020
Power Invs., LLC v. SL EC, LLC, 927 F.3d 914, 917 (6th Cir. 2019) (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)). … Marshall v. ITT Tech. Inst., No. 3:11-CV-552, 2012 WL 1205581, at *4 n.4 (E.D. Tenn. Apr. 11, 2012) (quoting Greene v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 72 F. Supp. 2d 882, 887 (W.D.
Cited 0 timesUnknown181 F. Supp. 2d 832 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Dec 11, 2001
State v. Brown, 551 S.W.2d 329, 331 (Tenn.1977). … Houston v. Dutton, 50 F.3d at 384-85 ; Alley v. Bell, 101 F.Supp.2d 588, 657 (W.D.Tenn.2000)(“... reliance on Brown simply does not raise a cognizable federal claim, but merely a claim under state substantive law.”)
Cited 8 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · Mar 5, 2020
Williams, 631 F.3d at 383; Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93 (2007) (citing Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976)). … Martin v. Overton, 391 F.3d 710, 714 (6th Cir. 2004); Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Young Bok Song v. Gipson, 423 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna