Case law

Mercer, Melissa Ann

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 14, 2015

PD-1711-13 MELISSA ANN MERCER, Appellant v. … The Legislative Budget Board’s (LBB) fiscal note of the bill–S.B. 1276, which became Article 42.038–discussed the provisions for allowing a county to order a defendant “convicted of a misdemeanor to reimburse the county

Thomas v. State

100 Tex. Crim. 114 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 1, 1925

P. under the authority of Mitchell v. State, 43 Texas 512 , O’Neil v. State, 14 Texas Crim. Rep. 588 , Gibson v. State, 53 Texas Crim. Rep. 360 , 110 S. W. 41 , Macklin v. State, 53 Texas Crim. Rep. 197 ,-S. … Brown was one of the thirty additional jurors summoned under the direction of the court.

Jones v. State

118 Tex. Crim. 458 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 27, 1931

In Munden v. State, 64 S. W., 239 , Munden and deceased had had a quarrel. … Branch’s Annotated Penal Code, sec. 1934; Black v. State, 65 Texas Crim. Rep., 336 , 145 S. W., 947 .

Moore v. State

380 S.W.2d 626 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 27, 1964

Such facts distinguish this case from Chavira v. … McRae v. State, 101 Tex.Cr.R. 411 , 275 S.W. 1067 ; Chester v. State, 108 Tex.Cr.R. 150 , 300 S.W. 57 ; Glover v. State, 125 Tex.Cr.R. 605 , 69 S.W.2d 136 ; Lawrence v.

Raby v. State

970 S.W.2d 1 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 4, 1998

Therefore, appellant was not in a position to bring to our attention the case of Brown v. Texas, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 355 , 139 L.Ed.2d 276 (1997), which called our precedent into question. … Brown, at -, 118 S.Ct. at 356. The majority does not mention the Brown concurrence. Perhaps because they question whether that opinion has any precedential value. 7 This is, in fact, a good question.

Burton v. State

146 Tex. Crim. 446 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 15, 1943

He had been assigned by the provost marshal to aid the Texas Liquor Control Board. … See Holloway v. State, 54 Tex. Cr. R. 115 , 111 S. W. 937 ; Campbell v. State, 55 Tex. Cr. R. 277 , 116 S. W. 581 ; Gustamente v. State, 81 Tex. Cr. R. 640 , 197 S. W. 998 ; Amthor v. State, 98 Tex. Cr. R. 383 , 265 S.

Green v. State

727 S.W.2d 272 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 4, 1987

Clark v. State, supra.” Aguirre v. State, 683 S.W.2d 502, 510 (Tex.App.—San Antonio, no petition.) … Hoffman v. State, 397 S.W.2d 461 (Tex.Cr.App.1965); Brown v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 692 , 353 S.W.2d 425 (Tex.Cr.App.1962); Graves v. State, 169 Tex.Cr.R. 595 , 336 S.W.2d 156 (Tex.Cr.App.1959).

Martin, Robert Lee

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 15, 2023

Martin v. State, No. 03-02-00435-CR (Tex. Ap.—Austin, May 15, 2003). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. … Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. Filed: February 15, 2023 Do not publish

Ex Parte Insall

224 S.W.3d 213 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 23, 2007

See Blanco v. … Ex Parte Brown, 158 S.W.3d 449 (Tex.Crim.App.2005).

Owens v. State

385 S.W.2d 246 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 25, 1964

Brown v. State, 162 Tex.Cr.R. 85 , 282 S.W.2d 224 , and Cooper v. State, 162 Tex.Cr.R. 624 , 288 S.W.2d 762 . This is exactly what occurred here. … In the relatively recent case of Lopez v.

Burnaman v. State

70 Tex. Crim. 361 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 7, 1913

Rep., 299 ; Wright v. State, 56 Tex.Crim. Rep., 120 S.W. Rep., 458 ; Wilson v. State, 60 Tex.Crim. Rep., 129 S.W. Rep., 613 ; Malcek v. State, 33 Tex.Crim. Rep., 24 S.W. Rep., 417 ; Brown v. State, 41 Tex.Crim. … Brown v. State, 24 Texas Crim. App., 170, 5 S.W. Rep., 685 ; Magee v. State, 43 S.W. Rep., 512 ; Robinson v. State, 63 S.W. Rep., 869 ; Newman v. State, 70 S W. Rep., 951; Watson v. State, 52 Tex. Crim. 85 , 105 S.W.

Cox v. State

247 S.W.2d 262 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 6, 1952

Two inspectors for the Texas Liquor Control Board, following a call which prompted them to go to Dé Soto, an admittedly dry area in Dallas County, Texas, obtained a search warrant, and proceeded to search the premises and … See Porter v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 226 S.W.2d 435 ; Peysen v. State, 136 Tex.Cr.R. 127 , 124 S.W.2d 137 .

West v. State

720 S.W.2d 511 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 17, 1986

See, for example, Brown v. State, 481 S.W.2d 106 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Fatemi v. State, 558 S.W.2d 463 (Tex.Cr.App.1977); Honeycutt v. State, 499 S.W.2d 662 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); and Beck v. … Brown v. State, 657 S.W.2d 797 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).

Ex Parte Williams

472 S.W.2d 779 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 16, 1971

He also acknowledged that he agreed to a condition of parole which was that: “Should the occasion arise, I will waive extradition and will not resist being returned by the Board of Parole to the State of New York.” … See Cook v. Kern, 330 F.2d 1003 (5th Cir.1964). See also State ex rel. Morris v. Tahash, 262 Minn. 562 , 115 N.W.2d 676 (1962).

Fuller, Alonzo Diego

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 2, 2014

WR-16,351-09 EX PARTE ALONZO DIEGO FULLER, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 12265-F IN THE 35TH DISTRICT COURT FROM BROWN COUNTY Per curiam . … App. 1996); Schlup v. Delo , 513 U.S. 298 (1995) .

Pena, Jose Luis

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 26, 2006

PD-0966-05 JOSE PENA, Appellant v. … Browning v. Burt , 66 Ohio St. 3d 544, 564 , 613 N.E.2d 993 , 1008 (1993)(distinguishing State v. 1981 Dodge Ram Van ), cert. denied sub nom. , St. Elizabeth Med. Ctr. v. Browning , 510 U.S. 1111 (1994).

Morrison v. State

150 Tex. Crim. 496 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 11, 1947

.; Coe v. State, 197 S. W. (2d) 345 ; Jones v. State, 182 S. W. (2d) 919 ; Brown v. State, 124 S. W. (2d) 124 ; Miller v. State, 114 S. W. (2d) 244 . We therefore sustain the contention. … In support of the opinion here expressed, we refer to the case of Underwood v. State, 39 Tex. Cr. R. 409 . That the testimony complained of was highly prejudicial to appellants is self-evident.

Bradford v. State

125 Tex. Crim. 41 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 14, 1933

As said in the case of Lopez v. … It was held in Brown v. State, 57 Texas Crim. Rep., 269 , 122 S.

Duke v. State

35 Tex. Crim. 283 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 18, 1895

In testifying to the assault and battery, the prosecutrix was permitted to state the means used in making it, to-wit: a whip and board. … Loyd v. State, 19 Tex. Crim. App., 321. We are of the opinion, however, that the statements of this witness, as presented by this record, were res gestae, and admissible as such.

Russell v. State

665 S.W.2d 771 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 6, 1983

Standing on the left side of the car was a white male with curly brown hair. Kastner identified appellant as being of the same height and build of the person he observed by the car. … A bloody white Levi jacket was found as well as a brown suede jacket. Dr. Jarrett Williams, a pathologist, conducted the autopsy on the deceased’s body.