Case law

Cason v. Cason

116 Tenn. 173 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1905

Citing Lee v. Vaughn, 1 Bibb (Ky.), 235; Copeland v. Curry, 1 Bibb (Ky.), 176-178; Appleton v. Horton, 25 Me., 23. In Pulsford v. … Citing C urry v. Kerr, 11 Lea, 142 . It was held by this court in Shields v.

State v. Powers

101 S.W.3d 383 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 6, 2003

In Patton v. … See Alicia Brown, Comment, Evidence — State v. Hurley: Erosion of the Marital Privilege for Confidential Communications in Tennessee, 25 U. Mem. L.Rev. 835 (1995).

State v. Meeks

262 S.W.3d 710 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 2, 2008

Davis, 2005 W L 2255968, at *6; see also, e.g., United States v. Brown, 449 F.3d 741, 745 (6th Cir. 2006); United States v. Hernandez Leon, 379 F.3d 1024, 1029 (8th Cir. 2004). 21 Bailey v. … Kirk v. Louisiana, 536 U.S. 635, 637 (2002); United States v. McClain, 444 F.3d 556, 562 (6th Cir. 2005); State v. Henning, 975 S.W .2d 290, 300 (Tenn. 1998); see also R.D.S. v.

Griffey v. Northcutt

52 Tenn. 746 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1871

Northeutt, and if this is not so, the complainant is not entitled to an account of the profits of the mill, but only to one-tenth of the reasonable rents, which he says complainant has already *754 received in the way of board … So in case of Barcroft v. Snodgrass, 1 Col., 445 .

Wallace v. County Court of Tipton County

3 Shan. Cas. 542 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1875

In order that this vote may be taken, the county court may order an election, upon application of the commissioners appointed to open books for subscription of stock in such road, or of the board of directors, if the company … [See others in dissenting opinion of Judge Turney, in Lauderdale Co. v. Fargason, 7 Lea, 169 -172].

Griffey v. Northcutt

52 Tenn. 746 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1871

Northeutt, and if this is not so, the complainant is not entitled to an account of the profits of the mill, but only to one-tenth of the reasonable rents, which he says complainant has already *754 received in the way of board … So in case of Barcroft v. Snodgrass, 1 Col., 445 .

State v. Rodriguez

254 S.W.3d 361 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 24, 2008

See, e.g., State v. Dutton, 896 S.W.2d at 117 ; Collins v. … Acts 116 ; see also Theodore Brown, Jr., The Formative Period, in the History of the Supreme Court of Tennessee, 1796-1835, in A History of the Tennessee Supreme Court 7-8, 374 n. 13 (James W. Ely, Jr. ed„ 2002). 7 .

State of Tennessee v. Joey DeWayne Thompson

285 S.W.3d 840 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 6, 2009

Second, the court must determine whether the previously determined facts constituted ‘an essential element’ of the mistried count.” 89 F.3d at 1479 (citing U.S. v. Brown, 983 F.2d 201, 202 (11th Cir.1993)). … In State v.

Lovin v. State

286 S.W.3d 275 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 23, 2009

Kirk with the Board of Professional Responsibility if Mr. … Cole v. State, 798 S.W.2d at 265 ; Pryor v.

State of Tennessee v. David Wayne Eady

Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 6, 2024

See State v. … Brown, McCormick on Evidence § 190, at 1034 (7th ed. 2013) (stating that to constitute a common plan, “each crime should be an integral part of an over-arching plan”).

Dobbins v. Crowell

577 S.W.2d 190 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 12, 1979

In Bennett v. … In Coleman v.

Dick Broadcasting Company, Inc. of Tennessee v. Oak Ridge FM, Inc.

395 S.W.3d 653 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 17, 2013

Ctr. v. … Co. v. Robert J. Denley Co., 38 S.W.3d 513, 519 (Tenn.2001) (emphasis added) (quoting City of Knoxville v. Brown, 195 Tenn. 501 , 260 S.W.2d 264, 268 (1953)).

State of Tennessee v. Janet Michelle Stanfield, Tony Alan Winsett and Justin Bradley Stanfield

554 S.W.3d 1 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 7, 2018

Brown, Union City, Tennessee, for the Appellee, Justin Bradley Stanfield. … State v. Hawkins, 519 S.W.3d 1, 32 (Tenn. 2017) (citing State v. Bell, 429 S.W.3d 524, 528 (Tenn. 2014)); State v. Climer, 400 S.W.3d 537, 556 (Tenn. 2013); State v. Turner, 297 S.W.3d 155, 160 (Tenn. 2009); State v.

Jordan v. Jordan

145 Tenn. 378 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1921

In Helm v. … Cox v. Waggoner, 5 Sneed, 543 ; Rose v. Nynatt, 7 Yerg., 31 ; Neal v. Robinson, 8 Humph., 435 ; Mulloy v. Young, 10 Humph., 298 ; Bartee v. Tompkins, 4 Sneed, 623 .

Louisville, Nashville & Great Southern Railroad v. Fleming

82 Tenn. 128 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1884

Some of these were cases of compensatory and others of exemplary damages: Railroad Company v. Carroll, 6 Heis., 347; Railroad Company v. Smith, 6 Heis., 174; Railroad Company v. Burke, 6 Cold., 45 ; Railroad Company v. … In Jerome v.

State v. Melson

638 S.W.2d 342 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 16, 1982

Brown, Jackson, for defendant-appellant. OPINION DROWOTA, Justice. In this case, Hugh W. Melson appeals directly to this Court his conviction of first degree murder and the sentence of death imposed by the jury. … Brady, supra , following United States v. Brown, 557 F.2d 541 (6th Cir.1977), which were not met here.

Going v. Going

148 Tenn. 522 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1923

Thus, in Ruge v. … State ex rel. v. Brown (1903), 31 Wash., 397 , 72 Pac., 86 ; Park v. Park, 18 Hun, (N. Y.), 466, and 80 N. Y., 156 , 62 L. R. A., 974; (second marriage in violation of divorce decree) ; Ryer v. Ryer, 33 Hun (N.

Nichols v. JACK COOPER TRANSPORT CO., INC.

318 S.W.3d 354 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 27, 2010

Usually you’re at the bottom of the board at all those terminals, and at the ones that they w[ere] discussing at that time I believe . . . w[ere] railheads, so that’s locally 50-mile, 100-mile radius … See id. at 328; Nelson v.

Kendrick and Others v. Dallum

3 Tenn. 220 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1812

The enterers, no doubt, did not foresee that such a construction *Page 229 would be given; and by the Supreme Court of the United States, in the case of Taylor Quarles v. Brown, February. 1812, it is called artificial. … In the case of Hamilton v. M'Culloch, Add, Rep, 272, an entry calling to include the White-Oak Level, adjoining the heirs of McKee, was deemed a special location.

State of Tennessee v. Marvin Maurice Deberry

Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 30, 2022

Canale & Co. v. … Ct. at 1642; City of Chattanooga v. Davis, 54 S.W.3d 248, 259 (Tenn. 2001) (noting that a “fine” is “a payment to a sovereign as punishment for some offense” (quoting Browning–Ferris Indus. of Vt. v.