Case law

HARRISON v. OLIVER

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 2024

Simmons v. Beard, 590 F.3d 223, 231-32 (3d Cir. 2009) (quoting Bond v. Beard, 539 F.3d 256, 289-90 (3d Cir. 2008)); Brown v. … See Sweger v.

Haisley v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.

776 F. Supp. 2d 33 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 2, 2011

Givens, a board certified psychiatrist. Dr. Givens also held a teleconference with Dr. White on January 17, 2008. Dr. … V.

Jacobs v. City of Pittsburgh

143 F. Supp. 3d 307 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 12, 2015

See Argueta v. … See Hammonds, 2014 WL 2604706 , at *1; Brown v. United States, 45 Fed.Appx. 92, 95 (3d Cir.2002) (rejecting unsworn allegations unsupported by the record).

HEMINGWAY v. SMITH

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 6, 2023

Harrington v. Richter, supra, 562 U.S. at 102-03. As the Court of Appeals has put it, “AEDPA gives state courts the benefit of th[e] doubt.” Brown v. … In Dowling v.

Kovach v. Service Personnel & Employees of the Dairy Industry, Local Union No. 205

58 F. Supp. 3d 469 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 2014

In Wiglesworth v. … See Hall v.

VILLEGAS-MARTINEZ v. MOSER

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 31, 2020

Mendoza v. Tamez, 451 F. App’x 715, 717-18 (10th Cir. 2011) (quoting Sandin v. … See id. at 455; Thompson v. Owens, 889 F.2d 500, 501-02 (3d Cir. 1989). “[T]he relevant question is whether there is any evidence in the record that could support the conclusion reached by the disciplinary board.”

CHMIEL v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 2020

Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 93 (2006). … Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 218 (2007). “Failure to exhaust administrative remedies is an affirmative defense that must be pled and proven by the defendant[s].” Brown v.

United States v. Juarez-Escobar

25 F. Supp. 3d 774 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 16, 2014

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, 561 U.S. 477 , 130 S.Ct. 3138 , 3155, 177 L.Ed.2d 706 (2010), quoting New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144, 182 , 112 S.Ct. 2408 , 120 L.Ed.2d 120 (1992). … See U.S. v.

In Re Phar-Mor, Inc. Securities Litigation

892 F. Supp. 676 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 20, 1995

("Giant Eagle"), and six members of the Board of Directors of Phar-Mor, Inc. ("Phar-Mor"), namely, Gerald E. Chait, Stanley Moravitz, Irwin Porter, David S. … In Eisenberg v.

ORNDORF v. FYE

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 2023

Hartman v. … Berg v. Cnty, of Allegheny, 219 F.3d 261, 276 (3d Cir. 2000)(citing Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 408-09 (1997)).

WILLIAMS v. CLARK

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 2020

Barndt v. Wenerowicz, 698 Fed. App'x 673, 677 (3d Cir. 2017) (per curiam); Fortune v. Hamberger, 379 Fed. … Brown v. Parker, 2010 WL 2080004, *2 (M.D.Pa., 2010) (citing Moody v. Daggett, 429 U.S. 78, 88 (1976); Montanye v. Haymes, 427 U.S. 236, 242 (1976)).

BAILEY v. WOOD

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 12, 2021

Inc. v. Senju Pharm. … Comm’rs of Bryan Cty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997)). There are no allegations in the Complaint that would allow the inference that Lt.

MCLAUGHLIN v. THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL 249

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 2024

See Fasold v. Justice, 409 F.3d 179, 188-89 (3d Cir. 2005). … Moore v.

Directv, Inc. v. Rodkey

369 F. Supp. 2d 587 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 16, 2005

West, 45 F.3d at 755 n. 9 (citing Berry v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State Univ., 715 F.2d 971, 981 (5th Cir.1983))(quoted in Cowell, 263 F.3d at 292 ). … See e.g., Jackson v.

ROE v. ODDO

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 9, 2025

v. Regents of the Univ. … Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 333 (1976) (quoting Armstrong v. Manzo, 380 U.S. 545, 552 (1965)).

HODNETT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 12, 2019

Allen v. … behavior, was well groomed, and had intact judgment, the ALJ pointed to Plaintiff’s own testimony and/or written function reports stating that she was able to manage money, follow written and spoken instructions, play board

IN v. STROUP

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 2021

See also Estelle v. … Lanzaro, 834 F.2d at 346; see Brown v.

JENKINS v. SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN SERVICES, INC.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 2021

In October of that year, SPHS’s Board voted to close the Primary Care Program. (ECF No. 41-14 at 5-9.) The space was repurposed and turned into a suboxone clinic. (ECF No. 41-5 at 3.) … Consistent with its stated reason, SPHS’s board voted to close the Primary Care Program seven months later. As a result, every position at the Primary Care Program was eliminated.

WARD v. CITY LIGHTING PRODUCTS COMPANY

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 2021

See Thornton v. … Xu Feng v. Univ. of Delaware, 785 F. App’x 53, 56 (3d Cir. 2019) (quoting Brown v. Henderson, 257 F.3d 246, 252 (2d Cir. 2001) (emphasis in original)).

CARTER v. SLATER

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 2021

Jones v. Brown, 461 F.3d 353, 359 (3d Cir. 2006). “[A] single instance is usually not enough.” Gibson v. Erickson, 830 Fed. Appx. 372, 373 (3d Cir. 2020) (citing Bieregu v. … See Hudson v.