Case law

James v. Duquesne University

936 F. Supp. 2d 618 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 2013

Richan Gaskins (“Gaskins”), a BSU board member, was stationed at the entrance to the dance. He was accompanied by two other BSU board members who assisted him with security. … Other BSU board members were collecting the admission fee.

SHEARS v. GOUGHLER

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 2023

See Grayson v. … See Afzal v. American Board of Internal Medicine, App.

Tanoma Mining Co. v. Local Union No. 1269, United Mine Workers

717 F. Supp. 357 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 12, 1989

In National Post Office Mailhandlers v. … The fact pattern of this case does not follow the pattern of the successorship cases previously decided under principles developed by the Arbitration Review Board.

EVANS v. DOE 1

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 2024

Brown v. Makofka, 644 F. App'x 139, 143 (3d Cir. 2016) (citing Groman v. Twp. of Manalapan, 47 F.3d 628, 634 (3d Cir. 1995)). … Leveto v. Lapina, 258 F.3d 156, 161 (3d Cir. 2001) (quoting Hafley v. Lohman, 90 F.3d 264, 266 (8th Cir.1996) (citation omitted)); accord Pani v.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. County of Allegheny

519 F. Supp. 1328 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 11, 1981

See also, Arritt v. … PENALTIES — Any county commissioner or anyone acting for the board of county commissioners who shall cause any person to be appointed to or promoted in the police force or as a fireman or fire inspector contrary to the provisions

Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance v. Winslow

66 F. Supp. 3d 661 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 2014

Co. of Am. v. Hinchey, 464 F.Supp.2d 425, 429 (M.D.Pa.2006) (citing Cloverland-Green Spring Dairies, Inc. v. Pa. Milk Marketing Board, 298 F.3d 201 , 210 n. 12 (3d Cir.2002)). … In that case a passenger on an international flight sought to recover for the emotional trauma caused by being notified of a bomb threat while on board. Terrafranca v. Virgin Atl.

Travelers Social Club v. City of Pittsburgh

685 F. Supp. 929 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 5, 1988

In Rizzo v. … See Laird v.

MASSEY v. WETZEL

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 2020

Abdul–Akbar v. … Brown v. City of Philadelphia, 331 Fed.Appx 898, 899 (3d Cir.2009). However, an indigent inmate's “allegations of imminent danger must be construed liberally in his favor.” Williams v. Forte, 135 Fed.

SWEENEY

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 2026

See Zagata Fabricators, Inc. v. … .”); In re Brown No. 25-BR-20265, 2025 WL 1702580, at *3 (Bankr. W.D. Pa.

Fidelity Trust Co. v. United States

49 F. Supp. 240 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1943

No petition for redetermination of said deficiency was filed with the Board of Tax Appeals. 32. The net proceeds realized by the E. T. … Counsel for the defendant contends that the instant case is controlled by Davidson v. Commissioner, 305 U.S. 44 , 59 S.Ct. 43 , 83 L.Ed. 31 .

EMRIT

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 23, 2025

(citing Sinwell v. Shapp, 536 F.2d 15 (3d Cir. 1976)); see Brown v. … See Emrit v.

MADER v. UNION TOWNSHIP

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 2020

Defendant Heather Daerr is the chairperson of the board of Defendant Union Township. Am. Compl., ECF No. 19, at ¶ 17. … Sempier v. Johnson & Higgins, 45 F.3d 724, 734 (3d Cir. 1995); see also, Greene v. Horry Cnty., 650 Fed. Appx. 98, 100 (3d Cir. 2016); Hetzel v. Health, Civil Action No. 19-336, 2020 U.S. Dist.

FULLER-WOODSON

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 7, 2026

See Brown v. Wolf, No. 2:16-cv-1081, 2026 WL 691386, *1 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 21, 20216), report and recommendation adopted, 2026 WL 688634 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 11, 20216). … B & B Corp., 409 F.2d 614, 618 (3d Cir. 1969); Continental Grp., Inc. v. Amoco Chems. Corp., 614 F.2d 351, 359 (3d Cir. 1980); Hadeed v.

MANIVANNAN v. United States

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 2021

Pahler v. City of Wilkes Barre, 207 F. Supp. 2d 341, 355 (M.D. Pa. 2001); see also Carroll v. Manning, 414 F. … See, e.g., U.S. v.

KAPLAN v. DISCOVER BANK

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 29, 2024

See Polizzi v. … In conclusion, strictly construing the removal statute and resolving all doubts in favor of remand, as the Court must, see Johnson v. Smithkline Beecham Corp., 724 F.3d 337, 346 (3d Cir. 2013) (quoting Brown v.

PROMINENT GMBH v. PROMINENT SYSTEMS, INC.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 22, 2019

Ferguson v. Valero Energy Corp., 454 Fed. Appx. 109, 111- 112 ( 3d Cir. 2011), Martin v. … Brown, 63 F.3d 1252, 1264 (3d Cir. 1995). 1 The Court notes that Plaintiffs, while complaining of multiple and vexatious motions, have themselves filed two motions for default judgment, the second of which was coupled

LITTLE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 19, 2024

See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1153-54 (2019); Jesurum v. Secretary of U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs, 48 F.3d 114, 117 (3d Cir. 1995) (citing Brown v. … See also Berry v. Sullivan, 738 F. Supp. 942, 944 (W.D.

United States v. Wander

465 F. Supp. 1013 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 7, 1979

In Brown v. … V.

VELA v. SUPERINTENDENT - SCI FOREST

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 13, 2020

Ross v. Varano, 712 F.3d 784, 799-800 (3d Cir. 2013) (citing Brown v. Shannon, 322 F.3d 768, 774 (3d Cir. 2003); Doe v. Menefee, 391 F.3d 147, 177 (2d Cir. 2004)). … Pabon v. Superintendent, SCI-Mahanoy, 654 F.3d 385, 392 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

Reese v. Kassab

334 F. Supp. 744 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 4, 1971

Justice Frankfurter in Joint Anti-Fascist Refuge Committee v. McGrath, 341 U.S. 123 , 71 S.Ct. 624 , 95 L.Ed. 817 (1951); Davis v. Weir, 328 F. Supp. 317 (N.D.Ga.1971); Ackies v. Purdy, 322 F.Supp. 38 (S.D.Fla.1970). … Baker v. Downey City Board of Education, 307 F.Supp. 517, 522 (D.C.Calif.1969). And one of the primary instances in which due process may be limited is in the valid exercise of reasonable police powers. Wilson v.