Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspawd

4,323 results

1.39s

  • CONWAY

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 2025

    See also Brown v. Croak, 312 F.3d 109 (3d Cir. 2002) (misleading or clearly erroneous statements can render a grievance process unavailable). … Id. at 588 (citing Brown v. Croak, 312 F. 3d 109, 112 (3d. Cir. 2002). At this first step, the instruction must also “be so misleading to a reasonable inmate to interfere with his use of the grievance process.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • JOHNSON v. MONTAG

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 2025

    See ECF No. 88 at 4 (citing Pearson v. Prison Health Serv., 850 F.3d 526, 536 (3d Cir. 2017). … See Gindraw v. Dendler, 967 F. Supp. 833, 836 (E.D. Pa. 1997) (“[T]he exercise by a doctor of his professional judgment is never deliberate indifference[.]””) (citing Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage & Supply Co.

    323 F. Supp. 256 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 24, 1971

    In Vaca v. … [Emphasis supplied) See also Boone v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • SMALIS v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 2024

    ) 2:19-CV-1609-NR Plaintiff, ) ) v. … But if he had applied for a variance, he could have presented those plans to the zoning board, and the board could have provided relief, or worked with him on certain compromises. Mr.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ligo v. Continental Casualty Co.

    338 F. Supp. 519 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 17, 1972

    Armon v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 369 Pa. 465, 468 , 87 A.2d 302, 303 ; Frisch v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, 218 Pa.Super. 211 , 275 A.2d 849 ; Simon v. Hospital Service Ass’n of Pittsburgh, 192 Pa. … See limiting provision in White v. Continental Casualty Company, 414 F.2d 549 (10th Cir. 1969).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lord Mfg. Co. v. Nemenz

    65 F. Supp. 711 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 1946

    Kay v. General Cable Corporation, 3 Cir., 144 :F.2d 653. … Kay v. General Cable Corporation, 3 Cir., 144 F.2d 653 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Mogell v. Franklin

    219 F. Supp. 2d 657 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 16, 2002

    White v. … Board of Educ. of Baltimore County, 165 F.3d 260 (4th Cir.1998) (denying parent-attorney’s request for fees under IDEA); Hawkins v. 1115 Legal Service Care, 163 F.3d 684 , 694-95 (2d Cir.1998) (applied Kay in denying attorney

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Flannery Bolt Co. v. Greenslade

    26 F. Supp. 502 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 1938

    See Ferguson v. Omaha & S. W. R. Co., 8 Cir., 227 F. 513 ; Brun v. Mann, 8 Cir., 151 F. 145 , 12 L.R.A.,N.S., 154; Hume v. City of New York, 2 Cir., 255 F. 488 ; Loy v. Alston, 8 Cir., 172 F. 90 ; Lang v. … See Cunningham v. Pettigrew, 8 Cir., 169 F. 335 ; Shaver v. Heller & Merz Co., 8 Cir., 108 F. 821 , 65 L.R.A. 878 ; Knights of the Ku Klux Klann v. Strayer, 3 Cir., 34 F.2d 432 ; Chute v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Kaite v. Altoona Student Transp., Inc.

    296 F. Supp. 3d 736 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 30, 2017

    While, in Seaworth v. … Finally, Defendant cites Board of Education for School District of Philadelphia, 911 F.2d 882 , a case that is also inapposite because that case was appealed following a bench trial, not the granting of a motion to dismiss

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Baker v. Emery Worldwide

    789 F. Supp. 678 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 1991

    See Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. Sweeney, 439 U.S. 24, 25, n. 2 , 99 S.Ct. *682 295, 296 n. 2, 58 L.Ed.2d 216 (1978); id., at 29 , 99 S.Ct. at 297-98 (Stevens J., dissenting). … In Roebuck v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Randolph Engineering Co. v. Fredenhagen Kommandit-Gesellschaft

    476 F. Supp. 1355 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 1979

    See Alyeska Pipeline Serv. v. Wilderness Society, 421 U.S. 240, 258-59 , 95 S.Ct. 1612 , 44 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975); Skehen v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg St. … The First Circuit in Cordeco Development Corp. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • GRECO v. KIJAKAZI

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 2024

    Ct. 1148, 1153-54 (2019); Jesurum v. Secretary of U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs, 48 F.3d 114, 117 (3d Cir. 1995) (citing Brown v. Bowen, 845 F.2d 1211, 1213 (3d Cir. 1988)). See also Berry v. Sullivan, 738 F. … See Walker v. Barnhart, 172 Fed. Appx. 423, 426 (3d Cir. 2006).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • DIFRISCHIA v. VIECARE BEAVER, LLC

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 23, 2023

    See e.g., Burg v. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Serv., 387 F. App’x 237, 241, n.6 (3d Cir. 2010) (citing Brown v. … See PG Publ'g Co. v. Aichele, 902 F. Supp. 2d 724, 735 (W.D. Pa. 2012), aff'd, 705 F.3d 91 (3d Cir. 2013)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Healing Children, Inc. v. Heal Children, Inc.

    786 F. Supp. 1209 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 27, 1992

    In the Humble Oil & Refining Co. case, the Patent Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board held that “ESLON” is but a mere modification of “S-LON” which does not alter the inherent significance thereof and that “S-LON” and … Several other cases support this conclusion: Li’l’ Red Bam, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • MADERO v. LUFFEY

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 2020

    Their ‘fugitive and wandering existence within the limits of a particular tract is uncertain,’ as said by Chief Justice Agnew in Brown v. Vandergrift, 80 Pa. 147, 148. … White v. New York State Natural Gas Corp., 190 F.Supp. 342, 346 (W.D.Pa. 1960) (citing Brown v. Vandergrift, 80 Pa. 142, 148 (Pa. 1875)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • DUDICS JR v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 2024

    See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1153-54 (2019); Jesurum v. Secretary of U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs, 48 F.3d 114, 117 (3d Cir. 1995) (citing Brown v. … See also Berry v. Sullivan, 738 F. Supp. 942, 944 (W.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Davila v. United States

    247 F. Supp. 3d 650 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 2017

    The Court denied Officer Bienemann’s Motion to Dismiss and the Northern Regional Joint Police Board’s Motion to Dismiss. Id. … Both Officer Bienemann and the Northern Regional Joint Police Board remain Defendants in No. 13-cv-70. .The United States' Motion to Dismiss is docketed at No. 13-cv-70, ECF No. 115. .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • PRINZI v. O'MALLEY

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 2024

    See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1153-54 (2019); Jesurum v. Secretary of U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs, 48 F.3d 114, 117 (3d Cir. 1995) (citing Brown v. … See also Berry v. Sullivan, 738 F. Supp. 942, 944 (W.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • WEBB v. RANGOS

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 23, 2024

    Gannaway v. Stroumbakis, 842 F. … Horsch v. Cantymagli, No. 24-CV-1183, 2024 WL 1444020, at *3 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 3, 2024) (citing Brown v. City of Philadelphia Office of Human Res., 735 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • POULSON v. SMITH

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 8, 2023

    Chinchello v. Fenton, 805 F.2d 126, 133 (3d Cir. 1986); Brown v. Grabowski, 922 F.2d 1097, 1120 (3d Cir. 1990). … May 24, 2021) (dismissing claims against prison health care administrator whose only awareness of the alleged misconduct was based on receipt of a grievance); Brown v. Nicholson, 2020 WL 610523, at *6 (E.D. Pa.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.