Case law

Confer v. CUSTOM ENG. CO. EMP. HEALTH BEN. PLAN

760 F. Supp. 75 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 3, 1991

See Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) Advisory Committee's Notes; Farr Man & Co., Inc. v. M/V Rozita, 903 F.2d 871 (1st Cir.1990). … For example, defendants argued that they could back date an amendment to an ERISA plan to deny currently due benefits, and that they could amend a plan solely by posting an obscure notice on a bulletin board, and that an

JONES v. FISHER

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 4, 2020

Higgins v. Beyer, 293 F.3d 683, 688 (3d Cir. 2002) (quoting Holley v. Dep't of Veteran Affairs, 165 F.3d 244, 247-48 (3d Cir. 1999)). … Sample v, Diecks, 885 F.2d 1099, 1118 (3d Cir. 1989); Brown v. Muhlenberg Twp., 269 F.3d 205 (Gd Cir. 2001).

Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. Quaker Medical Care & Survivors Plan

836 F. Supp. 314 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 1993

See Will v. … Id. at 157 (citing Franchise Tax Board of the State of California v.

In Re Chambers Development Securities Litigation

912 F. Supp. 822 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 30, 1995

Nothing herein will divert Chambers and its Board of Directors of their rights and duties under applicable law. 15. … Waldron v.

Kirk v. Allegheny Towing Inc.

620 F. Supp. 458 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 1985

Maintenance and cure benefits are intended to provide a seaman with the food, loding and medical services to which he is entitled normally during his service on board a ship. Vaughan v. … See also, Boatel, Inc. v. Delamore, 379 F.2d 850 (5th Cir.1967); Harney v. William M. Moore Building Corp., 359 F.2d 649 (2d Cir.1966); Sims v. Marine Catering Service, Inc., 217 F.Supp. 511 (D.La.1963); Schellenger v.

SUMMERS v. FCI LORETTO WARDEN

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 10, 2025

In a disciplinary hearing, the decision of the disciplinary board must be supported by “some evidence.” Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 447 (1985). … Wolff, 418 U.S. at 570; Macia v. Williamson, 219 F. App’x 229, 233 (3d Cir. 2007). Mr.

FACER v. O'MALLEY

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 2024

See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1153-54 (2019); Jesurum v. Secretary of U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs, 48 F.3d 114, 117 (3d Cir. 1995) (citing Brown v. … See also Berry v. Sullivan, 738 F. Supp. 942, 944 (W.D.

SWANKLER v. REPUBLIC FOOD ENTERPRISE CENTER, INC.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 2020

BACKGROUND Defendants seek to call James Stark, the chairman of RFEC’s board of directors (“board”) to testify that RFEC consulted with Attorney Valerie Faeth of … See Coleman v.

United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. Hess

41 F. Supp. 197 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 12, 1941

Then, in United States v. … Gilchrist, etc., v.

Weyandt v. Mason's Stores, Inc.

279 F. Supp. 283 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 9, 1968

National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 331 U.S. 416 , 67 S.Ct. 1274 , 91 L.Ed. 1575 (1947). … Henig v.

Frank v. United States

515 F. Supp. 703 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 9, 1981

See, e. g., United States v. White, 572 F.2d 1007 (4th Cir. 1978); Crawford v. United States, supra; Masciola v. United States, 469 F.2d 1057 (3d Cir. 1972); Gaugler v. … United States, 574 F.2d 937 (8th Cir. 1978); Billiteri v. United States Board of Parole, 541 F.2d 938 (2nd Cir. 1978); Payton v. Thomas, 486 F.Supp. 64 (S.D.N.Y.1980); Wilson v.

Young v. Municipality of Bethel Park

646 F. Supp. 539 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 1986

The plaintiff responds to defendants’ argument by citing the Supreme Court opinion in Cleveland Board of Education v. … See Conley v. Gibson, supra.

VALLIN

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 2026

v. … Grp. v. Oppenheimer Holdings Inc., 802 F.

Selena Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 2025

See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Biestek v. Berryhill, 587 U.S. 97, 102-03 (2019); Jesurum v. Sec’y of U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs, 48 F.3d 114, 117 (3d Cir. 1995) (citing Brown v. … Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011). See also Rutherford v. Barnhart, 399 F.3d 546, 553 (3d Cir. 2005) (holding that remand is not necessary where the error would not affect the outcome of the case).

Allegheny County v. Maryland Casualty Co.

32 F. Supp. 297 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1940

In White v. … United States, 301 U.S. 358, 376 , 57 S.Ct. 826 , 81 L.Ed. 1156 ; and National Labor Relations Board v. Fansteel Corporation, 306 U.S. 240, 265 , 59 S.Ct. 490 , 83 L.Ed. 627 , 123 A.L.R. 599 . In Anniston Mfg. Co. v.

SHEARER v. O'MALLEY

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 2024

See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1153-54 (2019); Jesurum v. Secretary of U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs, 48 F.3d 114, 117 (3d Cir. 1995) (citing Brown v. … Morales v. Apfel, 225 F.3d 310, 317 (3d Cir. 2000). See also Dula v. Barnhart, 129 Fed. Appx. 715, 718-19 (3d Cir. 2005); Salerno v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 152 Fed. Appx. 208 (3d Cir. 2005).

BARKSDALE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 31, 2024

Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 45 (1991) (citation omitted). See Wedgewood Village Pharmacy, Inc. v. … Martin v. Brown, 63 F.3d 1252, 1264 (3d Cir. 1995). Where no rule applies, however, the court's “inherent power is broad and can be called upon ... to fill-in the interstices between particular rules of conduct.”

Iannini v. Winnecour

487 B.R. 434 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 2012

Our Court of Appeals has consistently held that lack of subject matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time, including for the first time on appeal. 6 See, e.g., Brown v. Phila. Hous. … For instance, in Post v.

SHAHEED v. PETTY

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 21, 2023

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii); Brown v. Sage, 941 F.3d 655, 659 (3d Cir. 2019). … Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007).

KAUFFMAN v. SMITH

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 2024

See Liljeberg v. … was at issue in the bench trial); Clemmons v.