Case law

ROBISON v. SUTTER

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 8, 2022

Several days later, the Defendant nurses filed their own 1 Aside from Warden Kevin Sutter, the named Defendants include prison nurses Heidi Karash, Denise Long, Teri Masi, Emily Trevelline, Autumn Brown, Renee Fox, and … Consequently, on June 6, 2022, Judge Lanzillo filed a report and recommendation (“R&R”) in which, after weighing the factors outlined in Poulis v.

Gregory v. South Hills Movers, Inc.

477 F. Supp. 484 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 27, 1979

Tennant v. Peoria & P. V. Ry. Co., 321 U.S. 29, 35 , 64 S.Ct. 409 , 88 L.Ed. 520 (1964); Reiner v. … See also Gottlob v. Hillegas, supra; Carroll v. Pittsburgh Railways Company, 200 Pa. Super. 80 , 187 A.2d 293 (1962); Beck v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Co., 233 Pa. 344 , 82 A. 466 (1912); McKenna v.

Silvestri v. Lampl (In re Virginia Mansions Apartments, Inc.)

163 B.R. 471 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 1993

Carley v. … Budge v.

JOHNSON v. CITY OF ERIE POLICE BUREAU DEPT. ERIE, PA

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 22, 2020

Plymouth Twp., 132 F.3d 20, 29 n.4 (3d Cir. 1997) (“As in past cases, we treat the municipality and its police department as a single entity for purposes of section 1983 liability.”); Brown v. … Town of Castle Rock, Colo. v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748, 756 (2005) (quoting Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972)).

KAPCHUS v. AMERICAN CAP COMPANY, LLC

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 2020

Edison Co. v. Pa. … Kapchus with the National Labor Relations Board shortly after his termination. (ECF No. 7-3). American Cap Company contends that Mr.

Byrnes v. Herion, Inc.

757 F. Supp. 648 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 12, 1990

Parker v. Board of School Commissioners, 729 F.2d 524 (7th Cir.1984). … In Oswald v.

Coltec Industries, Inc. v. Hobgood

184 F.R.D. 60 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 25, 1999

Co. v. … Board of Educ., 575 F.2d 417 , 424 (3d Cir.1978).

WELLS v. HOUSTON

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 19, 2024

Brown M. HOUSTON, LIEUTENANT; J. ) BEUCHAT, CAPTAIN; K. … Brown Christopher B.

DELTONDO v. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PITTSBURGH

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 2023

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DENISE DELTONDO, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:22-cv-350 v. … P. 72(a), (b); Local Civil Rule 72.1(C)(2); see also Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 785 F.2d 1108, 1113 (3d Cir. 1986).

Coyne v. Marquette Cement Manufacturing Co.

254 F. Supp. 380 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 13, 1966

Restatement of Torts 2d, § 414; Jamison v. A. M. Byers Company, 330 F.2d 657 (3d Cir. 1964); cf. Trent v. … Marquette does not assign any issue of causation as grounds for judgment n. o. v. in its motion. See: Brown v. Dickey, 397 Pa. 454 , 155 A.2d 836 (1959); Maio v. Fahs, 339 Pa. 180 , 14 A.2d 105 (1940); Stringert v.

MADER v. UNION TOWNSHIP

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 27, 2021

Township Board meeting on June 24, 2020, the Township Board voted to take action against several non-plaintiffs’ property within the Township which Plaintiffs describe as “violating due process rights for vacating, condemning … Jail Inmates v.

United States ex rel. Stone v. Robinson

309 F. Supp. 1261 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 1970

one Peter Batinic; that on March 27, 1968, he went to the Hotel New Otani and waited in the lobby for about one hour; that a woman came into the lobby and went over to the elevator; that the petitioner followed her and boarded … Norris v.

Hamblet v. City Ins. Co.

36 F. 118 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 1888

Insurance Co. v. Young’s Adm’r, 23 Wall. 107 . It is indispensable to the constitution of any contract that its terms should be settled by the concurrent assent of both parties. Id.; Hamilton v. Insurance Co., 5 Pa. … Insurance Co. v. Robinson. 56 Pa. St. 256.

Galena v. Leone

711 F. Supp. 2d 440 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 2010

Brown v. Daniels, 290 Fed.Appx. 467, 470 (3d Cir.2008) (citing Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp., 4 F.3d 1153, 1166 (3d Cir.1993) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(a)). See also Walter v. … See Eichenlaub v.

PERSAUD v. MOSER

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 2020

Adams v. Trate, Case No. 1:20-cv-237, 2020 WL 7337806 (Dec. 14, 2020) (quoting United States v. Mathews, 2020 WL 6781946, at *2 (E.D. Pa. … First Class Mail) Jacqueline Brown U.S.

RENAUD

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 20, 2026

Estate of Roman, 914 F.3d at 798 (quoting Brown v. Muhlenberg Twp., 269 F.3d 205, 215 (3d Cir. 2001)). … See Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. 51, 62 (2011); Brown y. City of Pittsburgh, 586 F.3d 263, 293 (3d Cir. 2009).

United States v. Skurla

126 F. Supp. 711 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 1954

Metzler v. United States, 9 Cir., 64 F.2d 203 ; United States v. Alper, 2 Cir., 156 F.2d 222 ; United States v. … United States v. Rose, 3 Cir., 215 F.2d 617 ; McDaniel v. Drotman, D.C., 103 F.Supp. 643 .

CHI v. TRATE

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 25, 2022

failed to show that relief under §2255 would be “ineffective or inadequate to test the legality of his detention” as set forth in in §2255(e) and as discussed in In re Dorsainvil, 119 F.3d 245 (3d Cir. 1997), and Bruce v. … Box 8000 Bradford, PA 16701 (Via U.S Mail) Jacqueline Brown, AUSA

B & P DEVELOPMENT v. Walker

420 F. Supp. 704 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 2, 1976

Fuentes v. … Cincinnati Board of Education, 529 F.2d 625 (6th Cir. 1976) and the decision of this court in Piercy v. Heyison, 76-41 Erie (June 16, 1976). The court has carefully considered the implications of the above cases.

BELL v. BERRYHILL

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 2021

See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1153-54 (2019); Jesurum v. Secretary of U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs, 48 F.3d 114, 117 (3d Cir. 1995) (citing Brown v. … Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 197 n. 2 (3d Cir.2011). State agent opinions merit significant consideration as well. Chandler v. Comm’r of Soc.