Opinion

CHI v. TRATE

Court
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Filed
Aug 25, 2022
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 29.3%

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ANSON CHI, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) Case No. 1:20-cv-49

)

WARDEN J. HUTCHINSON,1 )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

The petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this case was received by the Clerk of Court on

March 3, 2020 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo for report

and recommendation (“R&R”) in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C.

§636(b)(1), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), and the Local Civil Rule 72(D). ECF No. 1.

Petitioner Anson Chi is a federal inmate currently housed at the Federal Correctional Institution

in McKean. His petition, filed under 28 U.S.C. §2241, was formally entered on the record on

April 3, 2020 and amended on April 29, 2020. ECF Nos. 7, 16. Respondent answered the

petition on July 7, 2020, ECF Nos. 27 and 28, and Petitioner filed a reply on July 28, 2020. ECF

No. 32.

On July 20, 2022, Magistrate Judge Lanzillo issued an R&R recommending that

Petitioner’s claims be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See ECF No. 36. Judge Lanzillo

acknowledged the various claims raised in the instant §2241 petition and noted that they mirror

the claims Petitioner raised in a §2255 motion that was decided adversely by the U.S District

Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Petitioner’s sentencing court). In recommending

1 By order of court entered on July 20, 2022, ECF No. 37, the current Warden of FCI-McKean, “J. Hutchinson,” was

substituted as the relevant Respondent in lieu of the former Warden, “B.Trate” See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d).

dismissal of the instant §2241 petition, Judge Lanzillo reasoned that Petitioner is attacking the

validity of his conviction rather than the execution of his sentence and, moreover, he has failed to

show that relief under §2255 would be “ineffective or inadequate to test the legality of his

detention” as set forth in in §2255(e) and as discussed in In re Dorsainvil, 119 F.3d 245 (3d Cir.

1997), and Bruce v. Warden Lewisburg USP, 868 F.3d 170, 178 (3d Cir. 2017). Id. Judge

Lanzillo therefore concluded that Petitioner cannot pursue habeas relief under §2241.

Petitioner filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on August 8, 2022. ECF

No. 39. At bottom, Petitioner contends that Magistrate Judge Lanzillo misstated and distorted

the grounds asserted in the instant §2241 petition as well as the grounds that Petitioner

previously asserted in his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. §2255. Petitioner accuses Judge

Lanzillo of conspiring with the U.S. District Judge who ruled adversely on his §2255 motion,

theorizing that the alleged conspiracy is intended to “illegally, intentionally, and wrongfully stop

[Petitioner] from getting the relief he’s entitled to” and thereby frustrate Petitioner from

“revers[ing] his unconstitutional and wrongful conviction and sentence.” ECF No. 39 at 4.

Petitioner also appears to believe that he either is or would have been entitled to habeas relief

based on the sentencing court’s delay in adjudicating his §2255 motion. He faults Judge

Lanzillo’s decision to stay proceedings in this case pending the sentencing court’s ruling on the

§2255 motion. He suggests that, instead of delaying the issuance of the pending R&R, Judge

Lanzillo should have proceeded to consider the grounds for relief that Petitioner raised in both

his §2255 and §2241 motions.

The Court has fully considered Petitioner’s arguments but finds that they lack merit.

After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and

Recommendation and Petitioner’s arguments thereto, the following order is entered:

NOW, this 25th day of August, 2022, IT IS ORDERED that the within petition for writ

of habeas corpus shall be, and hereby is, DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Lanzillo, issued on July 20, 2022, ECF No. [36], is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

As there are no further matters pending before the Court relative to the instant petition,

the Clerk is directed to mark this case “CLOSED.”

_____________________________

SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER

United States District Judge

cm: Anson Chi

44588-177

McKean Federal Correctional Institution

Inmate Mail/Parcels

P.O. Box 8000

Bradford, PA 16701

(Via U.S Mail)

Jacqueline Brown, AUSA

The Honorable Richard A. Lanzillo

(via CM/ECF)

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.