Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspamd

4,649 results

2.37s

  • Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 30, 2025

    § 404.1520(a)(4)@)-(v). … § 405(g); Johnson v. Comm’ of Soc. Sec., 529 F.3d 198, 200 (8d Cir. 2008). Substantial in this context is “more than a mere scintilla of evidence but may be less than a preponderance.” Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Box v. Petsock

    697 F. Supp. 821 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1987

    In Smith v. … Commonwealth v. Hoskins, 485 Pa. 542, 556 , 403 A.2d 521, 528 (1979); see also Commonwealth v. Brown, 247 Pa.Super. 401 , 372 A.2d 887 (1977).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Mays v. Scranton City Police Department

    503 F. Supp. 1255 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 1980

    For example, in Cleveland Board of Education v. … E. g., Bell v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Clark Distribution Systems, Inc. v. ALG Direct, Inc.

    12 F. Supp. 3d 702 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 2014

    Brown, 305 Pa.Super. 173 , 451 A.2d 477 (1982) (noting that normally, the existence of a cloud over title is not sufficient to breach the covenant of quiet enjoyment). … (citing Derrickheim v. Brown, 305 Pa.Super. 173 , 451 A.2d 477 (1982) (a breach of the covenant for quiet enjoyment does not occur until lessee is evicted from the premises)).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Heckman

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 2025

    (quoting Bradley v. Pittsburgh Bd. of Educ., 913 F.2d 1064, 1069 (1990)) (emphasis added). 6 Id. (quoting Hunt v. Drake, No. 16-CV-1729, 2020 WL 3402343 (M.D. Pa. … Pittsburgh Board of Education, district courts in this Circuit have deemed improper motions in limine that seek to preclude all evidence that would support the other party's claims, explaining that such motions

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sullo v. Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 24, 2019

    WithumSmith Brown, P.C., 692 F.3d 283, 293 (3d Cir. 2012)). … Co. v. Neary, No. 17-cv-2297, 2017 WL 5172294, at *5-6 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 8, 2017) (citing Jumara v. State Farm Ins. Co., 55 F.3d 873, 877 (3d Cir. 1995)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Holmes v. American Home Patient/Lincare

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 2024

    Op.) at 25. 37 See e.g., Brown v. Petco Animal Supplies Store, Inc., No. 4:21-CV-00330, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37155, 2023 WL 2395466 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 6, 2023). … See also United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ray v. Finley

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 2019

    United States v. Ray, 713 F. App’x 20 (2d Cir. 2017). … See Brown v. Phillip Morris, Inc., 250 F.3d 789, 800 (3d Cir. 2001). 2 See https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/ (search: Steven Ray; last visited October 24, 2019).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Laminations, Inc. v. Roma Direct Marketing LLC

    516 F. Supp. 2d 404 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 2007

    Corp. v. … Unique Concepts, Inc. v. Brown, 939 F.2d 1558, 1561 (Fed.Cir.1991). “[Wjords of a claim ‘are generally given their ordinary and customary meaning.’ ” Phillips v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Elyardo v. Lowe

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 2023

    See Rumsfeld v. … Elyardo appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), which remanded the case for further consideration by an immigration judge on June 26, 2023. (Doc. No. 9-5 at 3–5.)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Marino v. Howard

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 2022

    Torres v. Fauver, 292 F.3d 141 (3d Cir. 2002). … Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445-46 (1985); see also Griffin v. Spratt, 969 F.2d 16, 19 (3d Cir. 1992).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rhoades v. Days Inn By Wyndham

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 3, 2022

    Brown v. Philip Morris, Inc., 250 F.3d 789, 797 (3d Cir. 2001). A plaintiff must show that a defendant intentionally discriminated against him or her “because of race” in a contractual relationship. Katchur v. … Estelle v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mohl v. County of Lebanon

    939 F. Supp. 2d 504 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 2013

    See Revell v. … Further, DeLeo posted Mohl’s FMLA leave request form on a bulletin board in the Sheriffs office and publicly discussed his medical condition with coworkers, causing Mohl great embarrassment.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dooley v. Wetzel

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 19, 2022

    P. 37(a)(5); Martin v. Brown, 63 F.3d 1252, 1263 (3d Cir. 1995). But in this case, the moving plaintiff is proceeding pro se, and thus he has incurred no attorney fees in making this motion. … See Cooper v. Meyer, No. 16-cv-526-jdp, 2018 WL 1400956, at *3 (W.D. Wis. Mar. 19, 2018); Juarez v. Delgado, No. EDCV 13-0275-DDP (AS), 2015 WL 13917157, at *10 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2015); Milburn v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wassel v. The Pennsylvania State University

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 7, 2024

    (emphasis added). 187 Roman, 914 F.3d at 798. 188 Id. 189 Id. at 798-99 (quoting Brown v. … Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Timmons v. Burgess

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 22, 2023

    Auth. v. Orrstown Fin. Servs. … Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 149 n.3 (1984)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bowers v. Benchtold

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 2025

    See Chavarriaga, 806 F.3d at 227 (quoting Brown v. Muhlenberg Twp., 269 F.3d 205, 216 (3d Cir. 2001)). … (quoting Brown, 269 F.3d at 216).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • UNITED STATES, ETC. v. Lane Const. Corp.

    477 F. Supp. 400 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 1979

    MacEvoy Co. v. United States ex rel. … Brown & Root, Inc. v. Gifford-Hill & Co., 319 F.2d 65 (5th Cir. 1963); United States ex rel. Pioneer Steel Co. v. Ellis Construction Co., 398 F.Supp. 719 (E.D.Tenn.1975).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Daniels v. Lazusky

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 2025

    He also asserts that Defendants are “[t]rying to protect [the] Pennsylvania Parol [sic] Board.” (Id. at 5.) For these claims, Daniels seeks monetary relief. … .”); Grayson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Metcalf v. Cramer

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 2021

    Comm'rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997)). … Yuric v. Purdue Pharma, L.P., 343 F. Supp. 2d 386, 392 (M.D. Pa. 2004) (quoting Bridge v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 981 F.2d 97, 103 (3d Cir. 1992).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.