Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspamd

4,649 results

1.44s

  • Young v. Scott Township

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 2019

    Abraham v. … Jonathan had locked himself inside, screwing and boarding the front door shut.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hynoski v. Columbia County Redevelopment Authority

    941 F. Supp. 2d 547 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 2013

    See Selkridge v. … See Chada v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Burnside

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 24, 2025

    Pennsylvania v. Brown–Bey, 637 F. App'x 686, 688 (3d Cir. 2016). Therefore, she has not established jurisdiction under Section 1443(1). … See Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 44 (1971).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Walker v. Edwards

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 23, 2022

    Marmon Coal Co. v. Eckman, 726 F.3d 387, 394 (3d Cir. 2013). Res judicata “encourages reliance on judicial decisions, bars vexatious litigation, and frees the courts to resolve other disputes.” Brown v. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Abbey v. The Pennsylvania State University

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 2025

    Following the landmark decisions of Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly4 and Ashcroft v. … Cross Overseas Agencies, Inc. v. Wah Kwong Shipping Grp.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Williams v. Commonwealth of PA

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 17, 2022

    Further, Williams challenges the legality of his sentence and the parole board’s determination to increase his sentence to end on May 22, 2022. (Doc. 29, at 5-6). I. … Cowell v. Palmer Twp., 263 F.3d 286, 296 (3d Cir. 2001); see also Garvin v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sayles v. Allstate Insurance Company

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 2024

    v. … When objections are timely filed to the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, the district court must review de novo those portions of the report to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. '636(b)(1); Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mumma v. Mann Reaty Association, Inc.

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 2019

    In re Brown, 951 F.2d at 572 (quoting Tenn. Publ’g Co. v. Am. Nat’l Bank, 299 U.S. 18, 22 (1936)). … In re Brown, 951 F.2d at 572 (citation omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rinaldi v. Betti

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 2021

    See Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U.S. 723, 774-75 (2008); see also Russell v. Martinez, 325 F. … See Brown v. Mendez, 167 F. Supp. 2d 723, 726 (M.D. Pa. 2001); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e); Litterio v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lee v. White

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 2020

    Brown negligently rejected the BP-9 as untimely. (Id.). III. … .”); Speight v. Sims, 283 F. App’x 880, 881 (3d Cir. 2008) (citing Massey v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Tech v. United States

    935 F. Supp. 2d 802 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 2013

    Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306 , 70 S.Ct. 652 , 94 L.Ed. 865 (1950) citing Milliken v. Meyer, 311 U.S. 457 , 61 S.Ct. 339 , 85 L.Ed. 278 (1940). … Tech argues that because the IRS identified non-filers that received benefits from the Social Security Administration, Veterans Affairs and the Railroad Retirement Board in order to determine who was eligible for an ESA payment

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shearn v. Saul

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 25, 2022

    the report to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1); Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011). … Rieder v. Apfel, 115 F.Supp.2d 496, 499 (M.D.Pa. 2000) (citing United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676 (1980)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Centeno

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 26, 2026

    custody” requirement for purposes of federal habeas is construed “very liberally”); see also Orellana Juarez v. Moniz, 788 F. Supp. 3d 61, 67-68 (D. Mass. 2025) (citing Hensley v. … Municipal Court, 411 U.S. 345, 351 (1973); Jones v. Cunningham, 371 U.S. 236, 243 (1963)); Da Silva v. LaForge, No. 25CV17095 (EP), 2026 WL 45165, at *3 (D.N.J. Jan. 7, 2026); N-N-v. McShane, No.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Scopelliti v. Traditional Home Health and Hospice

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 2021

    See also, Brown v. Nutrition Mgmt. Servs. … See McCann v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Folk v. Bureau of Prisons

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 2019

    Rivera v. Pennsylvania Dep't of Corr., 346 F. App’x 749, 750 (3d Cir. 2009). … Brown, 461 F.3d 353, 359 (3d Cir. 2006), or resulted in “the loss or rejection of a legal claim.” Offver v. Fauver, 118 F.3d 175, 177 (3d Cir. 1997).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Merchant v. First UNUM LIfe Insurance Co.

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 2024

    Ltd. v. Colkitt, 455 F.3d 195, 201 (3d Cir. 2006); accord Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 324 (1986). … See Clauss v. Plan, 196 F. Supp. 3d 463, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2016) (quoting Miller v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 632 F.3d 837, 845 (3d Cir. 2011)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Castillo v. O'Haine

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 7, 2023

    “Once the [prisoner] completes the minimum term of incarceration, it is up to the Parole Board to determine when (and if) [he] will be released before serving the maximum sentence imposed by the court.” Fordham v. … Smith v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mazzeo

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 2026

    “Under Pennsylvania law, a school board may be the final policymaker with respect to some actions, while the school superintendent may be the final policymaker with regard to other actions.” G.S. v. Penn-Trafford Sch … | Based on her position, Defendant Baratta may possess the requisite authority for Section 1983 liability in the event that authority was delegated to her by the | school board and/or superintendent. See L.S. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Meyer v. U.S. Pipeline, Inc.

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 2023

    (citing Hart Trucking Repair v. Robb H, Inc., 2015 WL 7282631, at *15 (Pa. Super. … members to officer or board member positions [for the subsidiary],” and “reported the [subsidiary’s] earnings and losses on a consolidated basis in its own financial statements”—as sufficient to overcome a motion to

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cortese

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 2, 2026

    Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)). … (Doc. 17, at 1 n.2); see Kentucky v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.