Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspamd

4,649 results

0.70s

  • Logory v. County of Susquehanna

    277 F.R.D. 135 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 2011

    Plaintiff argues that the recent decision in Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Burlington should have no effect on the viability of the Fourth Amendment Class. 621 F.3d 296 (3d Cir.2010). … Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of County of Burlington, No. 05-3619, 2008 WL 800970 at *13 (D.N.J. March 20, 2008).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • White v. Pine Ridge Community Association

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 2024

    He was forced by the Board to review video of the attack in a Board meeting, which triggered an emotional reaction. … See Anfol v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. Masland

    896 F. Supp. 396 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 24, 1995

    896 F.Supp. 396 (1995) MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, Plaintiff, v. Edward K. MASLAND, Defendant. No. 4:CV-94-1995. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. August 24, 1995. *397 C. … securities laws may be litigated, it is agreed that any controversy between us arising out of your business or this agreement shall be submitted to arbitration conducted under the provisions of the Constitution and Rules of the Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gould, Inc. v. a & M Battery and Tire Service

    954 F. Supp. 1014 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 29, 1997

    Gould, Inc. v. … Chatham Steel Corp. v. Brown, 858 F.Supp. 1130, 1144 (N.D.Fla.1994).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Perry v. Welker

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 19, 2021

    Williams v. … Nyhuis v. Reno, 204 F.3d 65, 75-76 (3d Cir. 2000). Courts have typically required across-the-board administrative exhaustion by inmates who seek to pursue claims in federal court. Id.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hayes v. Houser

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 31, 2023

    See Brown v. … No. 4-13-2204, 2014 WL 4187666, at *4 (Aug. 22, 2014); Brown v. Hannah, 850 F. Supp. 2d 471, 476 (M.D. Pa. 2012). 97 Ingraham v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Malik v. Wyoming Valley Medical Center, P.C.

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 2020

    Budhun v. … .”); Cox v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • City of Wilkes-Barre v. Sheils

    382 B.R. 871 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 25, 2008

    Id. at 620 ; see also City of Pittsburgh v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Williams), 810 A.2d 760 , 762 n. 5 (2002) (holding that “Heart and Lung benefits are not subject to subrogation.”). … See Goldberg v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cormier v. Crestwood School District

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 2022

    West v. … Myers v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sorokaput

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 2026

    §636(b)(1); Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011). … v. Dentsply Intern., Inc., 702 F.Supp.2d 465, 469 (M.D.Pa. 2010) (citing Henderson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • McCollum v. Pries

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 2024

    MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHNNIE MCCOLLUM, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:22-cv-1710 v. … McCollum alleges that at other prisons, the prison boards alleviated staff shortages by offering “incentives” to recruit new staff, but the Dauphin County Prison Board did not offer such incentives.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Minnich v. Northeastern School District

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 26, 2021

    Brown v. Montgomery Cty., 470 F. App’x 87, 91 (3d Cir. 2012) (quoting Ersek v. Springfield, 102 F.3d 79, 83-84 (3d Cir. 1996)). … Thomas v. Cumberland Cty., 749 F.3d 217, 223 (3d Cir. 2014) (quoting Bd. of Cty. Comm'rs of Bryan Cty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Fleming v. Yates

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 2021

    When objections are timely filed to the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, the district court must review de novo those portions of the report to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1); Brown v. … Rieder v. Apfel, 115 F.Supp.2d 496, 499 (M.D.Pa. 2000) (citing U.S. v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676 (1980)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. Waldman

    486 F. Supp. 759 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 21, 1980

    Chicago Board of Trade v. United States, 246 U.S. 231, 238 , 38 S.Ct. 242, 244 , 62 L.Ed. 683 (1918). … In Spence v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Crown Central Petroleum Corporation v. Waldman, Carl J., 634 F.2d 127 (1980)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • United States v. Sorrentino

    78 F. Supp. 425 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1948

    Garber v. … The limits of the cross examination of Rose Brown were within the discretion of the court. Alford v. United States, 1931, 282 U.S. 687 , 51 S.Ct. 218 , 75 L.Ed. 624 .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Daniels v. Damiter

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 2024

    Baker v. McCollan, 443 U.S. 137 (1979). B. Heck v. Humphrey Under Heck v. … See Mator v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Craft v. Saul

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 2022

    §636(b)(1): Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011). … Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), advisory committee notes; see also Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Intern., Inc., 702 F.Supp.2d 465, 469 (2010) (citing Henderson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Marsh, Jr. v. Stratton

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 15, 2025

    Rivello (“Rivello”), Superintendent at SCI Huntingdon; (3) Johnny Johnson (“Johnson”) of the Pennsylvania Board of Pardons and Parole (“Parole Board”);1 and (4) the Secretary of the Commonwealth of … United States v. Fiorelli, 337 F.3d 282, 288 (3d Cir. 2003) (quoting Smith v. Evans, 853 F.2d 155, 158-159 (3d Cir. 1988)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • City of Wilkes-Barre v. Sheils

    450 B.R. 76 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 23, 2011

    Oliver v. … ] In Fulmer v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bolus v. Boockvar

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 23, 2020

    Trump for President, Inc. v. Boockvar, --F.Supp.3d--, 2020 WL 6821992 (M.D.Pa. 2020). … River Port Auth. v. Transamerican Trailer Transport, Inc., 501 F.2d 917, 919-20 (3d Cir. 1974) (citations omitted). Reilly v. City of Harrisburg, 858 F.3d 173, 176 (3d Cir. 2017).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.