Case law

Davies v. Polyscience, Inc.

126 F. Supp. 2d 391 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 8, 2001

Schafer v. Board of Public Educ., 903 F.2d 243 , 252 (3d Cir.1990); see also Glus v. G.C. Murphy Co., 629 F.2d 248 , 251 (3d Cir.1980) (stating four-part test for exception to exhaustion requirement). … See, e.g., Fullman v. Philadelphia Int’l Airport, 49 F.Supp.2d 434, 441 (E.D.Pa.1999); Brannaka v. Bergey’s, Inc., No. 97-CV-6921, 1998 WL 195660 , at *1 (E.D.Pa. Mar.30, 1998); Saylor v.

Trinsey v. Mitchell

851 F. Supp. 167 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 1994

Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 730 , 94 S.Ct. 1274, 1279 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974). … See generally LaRouche v.

DUNDON

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 10, 2026

v. … The 2016-17 Products Insurers maintain that Brown v. Endo was a critical fact known by Endo and therefore bars coverage for the later-filed PI/NAS Claims.

Robert Hawthorne, Inc. v. United States Department of Interior

160 F. Supp. 417 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 1958

Co. v. Lane, 1917, 244 U.S. 492 , 37 S.Ct. 714 , 61 L.Ed. 1275 ; Chapman v. Santa Fe Pac. R. … In the latter it was decided that the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, 88 F.2d 154 , had erroneously held that a District Court, 15 F.Supp. 915 , had jurisdiction to enjoin a National Labor Relations Board hearing.

United States v. Slattery

224 F. Supp. 214 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 11, 1963

Rutledge Slattery, the Company’s president, one of five directors, a substantial shareholder, a co-trustee of the voting trust which controlled the Company, and creditor of the Company, was authorized by the Board, in the … United States, 209 F.Supp. 98 (S.D.Cal. 1962); Bloom v. United States, supra; Wilson v. United States, 250 F.2d 312, 321 (9th Cir. 1958); Frazier v. United States, supra; Paisner v.

SCHRUBY v. SIANNI

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 2020

Later, Defendants Brown and Knapp removed Schruby from the RHU, indicating that he was going to the medical department. (Ud. at 4 56.) … See Small v. Wetzel, 528 F. App’x 202 (3d Cir. 2013). According to the Amended Complaint, Defendants Brown and Knapp arrived at Schruby’s RHU holding cell to escort him to the medical unit.

MARKEY v. CURTIN

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 24, 2025

Our Court of Appeals’s decision in Board of Chosen Freeholders of County of Burlington v. Tombs is instructive. … Robert Tombs requested copies of certain maps at the cost of reproduction from the Burlington County Board of Chosen Freeholders under New Jersey’s Open Public Records Act; the Board told Mr.

Apicella v. Valley Forge Military Academy

630 F. Supp. 20 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 27, 1985

Crew v. Bartels, 27 F.R.D. 5 (E.D.Pa.1961); Commonwealth v. Rothman, 209 Pa. 180 , 223 A.2d 919 (1966); Myers v. Sezov, 39 Pa. D & C 2d 650 (1966); Langdon v. Strawhecker, 46 Pa. D & C 2d 764 (1969). … Finally, plaintiffs John and Valerie Apicella have a contract claim against defendant Valley Forge for $2,558.76 1 for return of Jerry Apicella’s tuition, room and board.

ROSTICK v. VERIZON NEW YORK CORPORATE HQ

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 2023

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LAGALE BROWN ROSTICK, : Plaintiff, … APRIL 10, 2023 Plaintiff Lagale Brown Rostick brings this pro se civil action alleging violations of her constitutional rights. Rostick has moved to proceed in forma pauperis.

DOE 1 v. PERKIOMEN VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 25, 2022

In support of their points, they cite to two news articles which detail intense school board meetings and state that school board officials have received death threats for their positions on mandatory masking.1 Turning … School Boards Bearing Brunt of Anti-Mask Parents’ Anger, GoErie, https://www.goerie.com/story/news/2021/09/27/pa-school-board-mask-mandate/5846407001/; Justin Rohrlich, Covid Has Broken You People: Pennsylvania School District

Jefferies v. Sessions

278 F. Supp. 3d 831 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 2017

In Beers v. … In McHugh v.

Apokarina v. Ashcroft

232 F. Supp. 2d 414 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 4, 2002

In Tellez v. … Id.; see also Mendonca v.

BURK v. WELLPATH

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 16, 2024

Brown v. Lyons, 977 F. Supp. 2d 475, 481-82 (E.D. Pa. 2013) (citing Pettus v. Morgenthau, 554 F.3d 293, 297 (2d Cir. 2009)). … .; see also Brown v. U.S. Dist. Ct., E. Dist., No. 13-7229, 2014 WL 1225878, at *1 (E.D. Pa.

Bennett v. Knauer

528 F. Supp. 2d 571 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 2007

Kornegay v. Cottingham, 120 F.3d 392, 395 (3d Cir.1997). A factual dispute is “genuine” if the evidence would permit a reasonable jury to find for the non-moving party. Anderson v. … Brown v. Borough of Chambersburg, 903 F.2d 274, 278 (3d Cir. 1990). To satisfy the second prong of this analysis a medical need must be serious.

Grove Press, Inc. v. City of Philadelphia

300 F. Supp. 281 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 20, 1969

In Zwickler v. … Brown, 354 U.S. 436 , 77 S.Ct. 1325 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1469 , where an injunction procedure incorporating such guarantees was upheld.

RP Wynstone, LP v. NEW HANOVER TOWNSHIP

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 2024

the Board’s denial, and remanding the application to the Board to be stayed pending resolution of a procedural challenge. … Quackenbush v. Allstate Ins.

King v. Cuyler

541 F. Supp. 1230 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 18, 1982

See, e.g., Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362 , 96 S.Ct. 598 , 46 L.Ed.2d 561 (1976); McClelland v. Facteau, 610 F.2d 693 (10th Cir. 1979); Durkin v. Bristol Township, 88 F.R.D. 613, 615 (E.D.Pa.1980). … Plaintiff relies upon Wright v.

Stevens v. Meaut

264 F. Supp. 2d 226 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 28, 2003

See also General Electric Capital Corp. v. … See Harris v.

ALEJANDRO v. KIJAKAZI

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 2024

Levinson, M.D., a psychiatrist who is certified by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, treated Mr. Alejandro. R. 334–37, 365–69, 377–88, 477– 522, 543–46. Dr. … Sullivan, 954 F.2d 125, 129 (3d Cir. 1991) (contradictory opinions by state agency physicians were a sufficient basis for refusing to give a treating physician’s conclusory opinion controlling weight); Brown 5 A treating

Morris v. Gaspero

522 F. Supp. 121 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 28, 1981

On October 11,1977, plaintiff filed unfair labor practice charges with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in which he alleged that Stevens had unlawfully refused to reassign him to his former station and that Local … County of Dakota v. Glidden, 113 U.S. 222 , 5 S.Ct. 428 , 28 L.Ed. 981 (1885); Protective Closures Co. v. Clover Industries, Inc., 394 F.2d 809 (2d Cir. 1968); Eagle Oil Co. v.