Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspaed

10,000+ results

1.45s

  • VALENTIN v. SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 2023

    Valentin could have performed, including the job of a dental implant polisher, dowel inspector, or circuit board layout taper. R. 53-54. The ALJ ultimately concluded that Mr. … Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971) (quoting Consol. Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 (1938)). Substantial evidence “is more than a mere scintilla but may be less than a preponderance.” Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • LifeWatch Services, Inc. v. Highmark, Inc.

    248 F. Supp. 3d 641 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 3, 2017

    Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. … Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477, 488 , 97 S.Ct. 690 , 50 L.Ed.2d 701 (1977) (explaining that antitrust laws “were enacted for ‘the protection of competition not competitors’ ” (quoting Brown Shoe Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Keebler Weyl Baking Co. v. J. S. Ivins' Son, Inc.

    7 F. Supp. 211 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1934

    On January 30, 1932, the plaintiff began to sell it also in paste-board cartons having a distinctive design in two shades of green and yellow and prominently marked with the words “Club Crackers.” … And in Jacobs v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • FORMAN v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 7, 2020

    . °° Salvato, 2020 WL 247880, at *3 (citing Brown v. Muhlenberg Township, 269 F.3d 205, 214 (3d Cir. 2001)). Jiminez v. All American Rathskeller, Inc., 503 F.3d 247, 249 (3d Cir. 2007). 52 Stevens v. … Sample v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ciolli v. Iravani

    651 F. Supp. 2d 356 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 28, 2009

    See Brown v. AST Sports Sci, Inc., No. 02-1682, 2002 WL 32345935 , at *6, 8 (E.D.Pa. … Keeton v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Hicks v. Arthur

    159 F.R.D. 468 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 11, 1995

    McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. … Id. at 805 , 93 S.Ct. at 1825 ; Robbins v. Camden City Board of Educ., 105 F.R.D. 49, 55-56 (D.N.J. 1985). Accordingly, we hold that statistical evidence is relevant for discovery purposes in this case.

    Disagreed with by Hall v. Harleysville Ins., 164 F.R.D. 406 (1996)Cited 13 timesPublished
  • STEVENS v. TRANS UNION, LLC

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 2022

    Id. 2-3 (citing, inter alia, Brown v. Firstsource Advantage, LLC, No. 17-5760, 2019 WL 568935 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 12, 2019) and Hornicek v. Cardworks Servicing, LLC, No. 10-3631, 2011 WL 2623274, at *3-4 (E.D. Pa. … See also, Century Indemnity Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Flores

    3 F. Supp. 134 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 4, 1932

    The question discussed in this case would be a very interesting one if it had not been set at rest by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in the case of Mathues v. United States ex rel. … The indictment charges that the defendant, a citizen of the United States, was on board and one of the crew of an American ship at the time in a port under the jurisdiction of the King of Belgium in' the inland waters of

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Burke v. Twp. of Cheltenham

    742 F. Supp. 2d 660 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 2010

    Brown v. Daniels, 128 Fed.Appx. 910, 913 (3d Cir.2005) (quoting Lum v. Bank of America, 361 F.3d 217 , 222 n. 3 (3d Cir. 2004)) (internal quotation marks omitted). … Id. at 633-34 (citing Brown v. Borough of Chambersburg, 903 F.2d 274, 277 (3d Cir.1990)).

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Halstead v. Motorcycle Safety Foundation, Inc.

    71 F. Supp. 2d 455 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 1999

    A “public body” is defined to include all of the following: (1) A state officer, agency, department, division, bureau, board, commission, council, authority or other body in the executive branch of State government. (2) A … county, city, township, regional governing body, council, school district, special district or municipal corporation, or a board, department, commission, council or agency. (3) Any other body which is created by Commonwealth

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • CHRISTEN G. v. Lower Merion School Dist.

    919 F. Supp. 793 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 21, 1996

    Oberti v. Board of Educ., 995 F.2d 1204 , 1213 n. 16 (3d Cir.1993) (quoting Polk, supra, at 173 ). … Judicial Review Under the IDEA As set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Board of Educ. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Bennett v. Republic Services, Inc.

    179 F. Supp. 3d 451 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 7, 2016

    Brown v. Hammond, 810 F.Supp. 644, 646 (E.D.Pa.1993) (quoting Geary v. U.S. Steel Corp., 456 Pa. 171 , 319 A.2d 174, 175 (1974)). … See., e.g., Borse v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Lonon v. Companhia de Navegacao Lloyd Basileiro

    85 F.R.D. 71 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 1979

    See, e. g., United States v. Oregon, 366 U.S. 643, 648 , 81 S.Ct. 1278 , 6 L.Ed.2d 575 (1961); Patagonia Corp. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 517 F.2d 803 , 810 at n. 10 (9th Cir. 1975); Kratz v. … See, Icenogle v. Olympic Airways, S. A., 82 F.R.D. 36 (D.D.C.1979).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • SWEDA v. UPPER BUCKS COUNTY TECHNICAL SCHOOL

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 2025

    Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972). … (quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. at 569-570 and Perry v. Sinderman, 408 U.S. at 599).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Eisenberg v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.

    761 F. Supp. 20 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1991

    Defendant cites Fletcher v. … In Chuy v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • BURK v. EASON

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 2021

    He alleges that since filing the grievance, his “state browns have been ripped along with my boxers (underwear). (Id. (parenthetical in original).) … Vogt v. Wetzel, 8 F.4th 182, 185 (3d Cir. 2021) (citing Mala v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Michener v. Brady (In Re Brady)

    243 B.R. 253 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 13, 2000

    Michener agreed to “[turn] over to the Pennsylvania Lawyers Fund for Client Security Board whatever rights and claims may exist against the attorney or against any other party, so that the Board may proceed to. obtain whatever … U.S. v. Roberson, 188 B.R. 364 (D.Md.1995).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Romanyuk v. Lynch

    151 F. Supp. 3d 559 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 16, 2015

    See I.N.S. v. … The Board concluded that after-acquired spouses and children do not qualify as grandfathered aliens for the purposes.of Section 1255(i) adjustm’ent. Id. at 184.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • RUSNAK

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 8, 2026

    Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 409 (1997). … Compl. ¶ 69; see also Elliott v. Pa. Interschol. Ath. Ass’n, 486 F. Supp. 3d 838, 851 (M.D. Pa. 2020) (citing Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ettinger v. Central Penn National Bank

    2 B.R. 385 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 6, 1979

    Cipriano v. City of Houma, 395 U.S. 701 [, 89 S.Ct. 1897 , 23 L.Ed.2d 647 ;] Allen v. State Board of Elections, 393 U.S. 544 [, 89 S.Ct. 817 , 22 L.Ed.2d 1 ;] Hanover Shoe [, Inc.] v. … State Board of Elections, supra, [393 U.S.] at 572 [, 89 S.Ct. 817, at 835 .]

    Reversed on other grounds by Ettinger, Leonard L., Trustee in Bankruptcy of John S. Milne, Inc. v. Central Penn National Bank, 634 F.2d 120 (1980)Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.