Case law

NARKIEWICZ v. MANHEIM TOWNSHIP

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 18, 2022

Hill v. Borough of Kutztown, 455 F.3d 225, 236 (3d Cir. 2006) (quoting Codd v. Velger, 429 U.S. 624, 628 (1977)). … V.

Groves v. Insurance Co. of North America

433 F. Supp. 877 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 1977

As Judge Newcomer has pointed out, “[t]his Court is committed to the ‘across-the-board’ approach to civil rights class actions.” Paddison v. Fidelity Bank, 60 F.R.D. 695, 698 (E.D.Pa.1973); see Wil *883 liams v. … What has been said above with respect to the across-the-board approach is highly relevant here also.

Claudio v. MGS MacHine Corp.

798 F. Supp. 2d 575 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 2011

Both groups also wore brown jumpsuits on occasion, but the TBC employees’ brown jumpsuit always bore a Tasty Kake logo. Id. at 55:6-24. TBC dictated what other clothing was acceptable while operating the machinery. Mem. … Grp. v.

The Pennsylvania

15 F. 814 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 14, 1883

Without citing other cases—(Hay v. Le Neve, 2 Shaw, Scotch App. Cas. 395; Foster v. Miranda, 1 Newb. 229 ; The Monarch, W. Rob. 21 ; The Rival, 1 Spr. 128 ; Lennox v. Winisimmet Co. … No torch was on board; no provision had been made respecting it.

FORMAN v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 7, 2020

. °° Salvato, 2020 WL 247880, at *3 (citing Brown v. Muhlenberg Township, 269 F.3d 205, 214 (3d Cir. 2001)). Jiminez v. All American Rathskeller, Inc., 503 F.3d 247, 249 (3d Cir. 2007). 52 Stevens v. … Sample v.

PURDY v. CIPPCO INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 2, 2025

Brown v. Philip Morris Inc., 250 F.3d 789, 796 (3d Cir. 2001). … Brown, 250 F.3d at 797 (quoting Yelverton v. Lehman, Civ. A. No. 94-6114, 1996 WL 296551, at *7 (E.D. Pa. June 3, 1996)).

Free Speech Coal., Inc. v. Sessions

322 F. Supp. 3d 605 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 3, 2018

Their evidence and arguments convinced the District Court that the provision was unconstitutional across the board. … Knick v.

Shopmen’s Local No. 502 Pension Plan, et al. v. Pencoyd Iron Works, Inc., et al.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 4, 2026

See Brown v. Astro Holdings, Inc., 385 F. Supp. 2d 519, 533-34 (E.D. Pa. 2005). … Brown v. Astro Holdings, Inc., 385 F. Supp. 2d 519, 534 (E.D. Pa. 2005); Gov’t Dev. Bank for P.R. v. Holt Marine Terminal, Inc., No. CV 02-7825, 2011 WL 1135944, at *13 (E.D. Pa.

VALENTIN v. SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 2023

Valentin could have performed, including the job of a dental implant polisher, dowel inspector, or circuit board layout taper. R. 53-54. The ALJ ultimately concluded that Mr. … Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971) (quoting Consol. Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 (1938)). Substantial evidence “is more than a mere scintilla but may be less than a preponderance.” Brown v.

Reading China & Glass Co v. India Exotics (In Re Reading China & Glass Co.)

126 B.R. 35 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 1991

Co. v. North Star Reinsurance Co., 912 F.2d 672 , 675 n. 1 (3d Cir.1990), a district court in Jackson v. … Williamson County Board of Education, No. 90-1280 (1991), 59 U.S.L.W. 3583 . A disposition conference on the matter is currently scheduled for April 17, 1991.

MOORE v. THE CHESTER COUNTY COURTS

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 2022

Claim Against the State Parole Board Mr. Moore’s claim against the (Pennsylvania) State Parole Board fails because the Board is also immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment. See Fenton v. … (citing Harper v. Jeffries, 808 F.2d 281, 284 n.4 (3d Cir. 1986))). Moreover, as a state agency, the State Parole Board is not a “person” against whom a civil rights action may be brought under Section 1983.

Fialkowski v. Greenwich Home for Children, Inc.

683 F. Supp. 103 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1987

Board of Education of East Windsor Regional School District v. Diamond, 808 F.2d 987, 996 (3d Cir.1986); Davenport v. Saint Mary Hospital, 633 F.Supp. 1228, 1232 (E.D.Pa.1986). … Lugar v.

United States ex rel. Harding v. Marks

403 F. Supp. 946 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 1975

Brown v. Russell, 318 F.Supp. 76 (E.D.Pa.1970). … Brown v. Russell, supra (decision by a judge without opinion in favor of the Commonwealth pursuant to the Post-Conviction Hearing Act was deemed to be on the merits).

Wells v. General Electric Co.

78 F.R.D. 433 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 4, 1978

The Board of Directors of GE does establish a general exempt employee compensation plan providing 28 levels of compensation with a range of salaries fixed for each level. … For example, the salary policy discussed above is set by the Board of GE, but is applied to any particular exempt position or employee by the local manager.

Uddin v. Mayorkas

862 F. Supp. 2d 391 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 16, 2012

In Lopez v. … Boswell Mem’l Hosp. v.

Van Muching [Sic] & Co., Inc. v. M/V STAR MINDANAO

630 F. Supp. 433 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 27, 1985

In Canadian Transport Co. v. … In Vana Trading Co., Inc. v. S.S.

AC & S, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

500 F. Supp. 511 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 1980

In Maryland Casualty Co. v. … See Mount Healthy Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977) and Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wetzel, 424 U.S. 737 , 96 S.Ct. 1202 , 47 L.Ed.2d 435 (1976).

Total Containment, Inc. v. Environ Products, Inc.

921 F. Supp. 1355 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 3, 1995

Unique Concepts, Inc. v. Brown, 939 F.2d 1558, 1561 (Fed.Cir.1991). In determining the proper scope of the claims, the court must first resort to the words of the claims themselves. … Unique Concepts v. Brown, 939 F.2d 1558, 1562 (Fed.Cir.1991).

Gordon v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

564 F. Supp. 199 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 11, 1983

United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens,-U.S.-,-, 103 S.Ct. 1478, 1482 , 75 L.Ed.2d 403 (1982) quoting Furnco Construction Corp. v. … Goff v.

LifeWatch Services, Inc. v. Highmark, Inc.

248 F. Supp. 3d 641 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 3, 2017

Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. … Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477, 488 , 97 S.Ct. 690 , 50 L.Ed.2d 701 (1977) (explaining that antitrust laws “were enacted for ‘the protection of competition not competitors’ ” (quoting Brown Shoe Co. v.