Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersorctapp

10,000+ results

2.24s

  • McCurdy v. Johnson

    146 Or. App. 379 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 12, 1997

    The issue is whether the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (Board) retroactively applied the current version of ORS 144.125(3) when it postponed plaintiff’s parole date. … If the Board did apply the current version, plaintiff is correct that we would be compelled to reverse. Meadows v. Schiedler, 143 Or App 213 , 924 P2d 314 (1996).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Port of St. Helens v. Geiser

    19 Or. App. 87 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 23, 1974

    found an emergency to exist “and that such equipment must be installed promptly * * The Board is given authority to enact emergency legislation by ORS 777.190 and 198.550. … Greenberg v. Lee et al., 196 Or 157 , 248 P2d 324 , 35 ALR2d 567 (1952); Joplin v. Ten Brook et al., 124 Or 36 , 263 P 893 (1928). Affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Cid

    331 Or. App. 231 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 28, 2024

    Marteeny v. Brown, 321 Or App 250, 253, 517 P3d 343, rev den, 370 Or 303 (2022). … State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Reynolds

    31 Or. App. 309 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 24, 1977

    They were looking for the gun, mask and clothing used in the robbery plus cash which had been taken in a brown paper bag. … State v. Keith, 2 Or App 133 , 465 P2d 724 rev den (1970). The finding of 14 identical checks of the Knappa Mobile Court to Stephen A.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Ramsey

    184 Or. App. 468 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 23, 2002

    State v. Brown, 306 Or 599, 602 , 761 P2d 1300 (1988). … Defendant’s evidence may be weak, but it meets the “any evidence” standard stated in Brown. See 307 at 602-04. 5 The court’s holding in Barrett is in apparent conflict with its reasoning in State v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Hall v. Cupp

    22 Or. App. 151 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 14, 1975

    Petitioner also relies on Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 US 539 , 94 S Ct 2963 , 41 L Ed 2d 935 (1974). In Sterling v. … The same can be said of Wolff v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kaeo v. SAIF Corp.

    185 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 13, 2002

    SAIF v. Belden, 155 Or App 568, 575 , 964 P2d 300 (1998), rev den, 328 Or 330 (1999). … See Dietz v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Maddux v. SAIF Corp.

    175 Or. App. 603 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 8, 2001

    We review the Board’s order for substantial evidence. See Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp., 309 Or 292, 295 , 787 P2d 884 (1990). … See Robinson v. Nabisco, Inc., 331 Or 178, 181 , 11 P3d 1286 (2000).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tracy v. Lane County

    86 Or. App. 305 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 8, 1987

    They rely primarily on ORS chapter 652; Putnam v. … Any order issued by the board pursuant to this section may be *309 enforced at the instance of either party or the board in the circuit court for thfe county in which the dispute arose.”

    Reversed by Tracy v. Lane County, 305 Or. 378 (1988)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • SAIF Corp. v. Freeman

    130 Or. App. 81 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 7, 1994

    Employer contends, relying on our decisions in Middleton v. SAIF, 31 Or App 313 , 570 P2d 406 (1977), and Burks v. … In Middleton v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bailey v. Reynolds Metals

    153 Or. App. 498 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 22, 1998

    Sawinski v. … See, e.g., Schultz v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Jackson

    172 Or. App. 414 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 14, 2001

    Maass, 144 Or App 574 , 928 P2d 351 , rev den 326 Or 464 (1998); State v. Chambers, 150 Or App 336, 340 , 946 P2d 300 (1997); State v. Brown, 141 Or App 156 , 917 P2d 527 , rev den 323 Or 691 (1996); State v. … State v. Brown is the only reported Oregon case in which a written waiver of counsel is mentioned. 141 Or App at 159 .

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • LDS Development, LLC v. City of Eugene

    280 Or. App. 611 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 16, 2016

    See Burks v. … Prosch v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Gibson

    75 Or. App. 759 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 16, 1985

    PER CURIAM Employer seeks judicial review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order which awarded claimant permanent total disability. … That issue was decided adversely to employer in Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Gibson, 60 Or App 226 , 656 P2d 964 (1982). Therefore, the only issue for review is whether claimant is permanently and totally disabled.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Matter of Compensation of McKenzie

    645 P.2d 30 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 19, 1982

    Gray & Co. v. McKenzie, 56 Or. App. 394 , 641 P.2d 672 (1982), which affirmed an order of the Workers' Compensation Board awarding claimant compensation for permanent and total disability. … Gas-Ice Corporation v. Newbern, 263 Or. 227, 234 , 501 P.2d 1288 (1972).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wheeler v. Liberty Northwest Insurance

    148 Or. App. 301 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 11, 1997

    In Progress Quarries v. … See, e.g., Dethlefs v. Hyster Co., 295 Or 298 , 667 P2d 487 (1983) (applying major contributing cause test to occupational disease claim); Aetna Casualty Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Barrett v. Belleque

    209 Or. App. 295 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 15, 2006

    Haskins v. Palmateer, 186 Or App 159, 163 , 63 P3d 31 , rev den, 335 Or 510 (2003) (quoting Gage v. Maass, 306 Or 196, 204 , 759 P2d 1049 (1988)). As the Supreme Court explained in Penrod/Brown v. … See, e.g., Bedell v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Paul v. Personnel Division

    28 Or. App. 603 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 22, 1977

    Vollmer v. Schrunk, 242 Or 196 , 409 P2d 177 (1965) (Denecke, J., concurring specially). … See generally Myers v. Carter/Marquam Invest. Corp., 27 Or App 351 , 556 P2d 703 (1976). In Eatherly v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Baxter v. Monmouth City Council

    51 Or. App. 853 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 27, 1981

    See, e.g., In re Willow Creek, 74 Or 592 , 144 P 505 , 146 P 475 (1915); Evanhoff v. State Industrial Acc. Com., 78 Or 503 , 154 P 106 (1915); Mallatt v. Luihn et al, 206 Or 678 , 294 P2d 871 (1956); Mazama Tim. v. … See Mallatt v. Luihn et al, supra; Mazama Tim. v. Lane Air Poll. Auth., supra; cf., Evanhoff v. State Industrial Acc. Com., supra.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Dennis v. Employment Department

    143 Or. App. 574 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 18, 1996

    Claimant argues that the board erred in concluding that she was discharged for misconduct, because there is no rational connection between the board’s findings and its conclusion on that issue. See, e.g., Tyler v. … Employment Dept., 133 Or App 662, 665 , 893 P2d 552 (1995); McCann v. OLCC, 27 Or App 487, 493 , 556 P2d 973 (1976). We agree.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.