Opinion

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Gibson

  • 75 Or. App. 759
  • 707 P.2d 1239
  • 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3970
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Filed
Oct 16, 1985
Status
Published
On the bench
Gillette, Joseph, Young
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 47.3%

The opinion

PER CURIAM

Employer seeks judicial review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order which awarded claimant permanent total disability. On de novo review, we find that claimant meets the statutory criteria for permanent total disability and therefore affirm.

Employer attempts to argue the issue of whether claimant’s back and neck problems are a compensable consequence of his 1980 industrial injury. That issue was decided adversely to employer in Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Gibson, 60 Or App 226 , 656 P2d 964 (1982). Therefore, the only issue for review is whether claimant is permanently and totally disabled.

In view of claimant’s age, his chronic physical problems related to the industrial injury, the lack of present opportunities for the employment of his skills and the futility of requiring a continuing search for work, we agree with the Board’s extent of disability determination.

Affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.