Opinion

McCurdy v. Johnson

  • 146 Or. App. 379
  • 934 P.2d 448
  • 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 92
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Filed
Feb 12, 1997
Status
Published
On the bench
Landau, Leeson, Riggs
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.2%

The opinion

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s judgment for defendant on plaintiffs petition for habeas corpus. We reverse and remand.

The issue is whether the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (Board) retroactively applied the current version of ORS 144.125(3) when it postponed plaintiff’s parole date. If the Board did apply the current version, plaintiff is correct that we would be compelled to reverse. Meadows v. Schiedler, 143 Or App 213 , 924 P2d 314 (1996). However, neither the Board’s order nor plaintiffs psychological evaluation appears in the record, making it impossible for us to determine whether the Board retroactively applied ORS 144.125(3) when it postponed plaintiffs parole date. Consequently, we reverse and remand for the trial court to determine whether the Board applied the current version of the statute. Meadows, 143 Or at 221.

Reversed and remanded.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.