Case law

Miller v. Multnomah County

153 Or. App. 30 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 18, 1998

A hearings officer denied the application, and petitioner appealed to the county governing body (board). … In Evans, LUBA analogized the language of ORS 215.750 and related provisions to that of ORS 215.213(2) and ORS 215.283(2), which the Supreme Court interpreted in Brentmar v.

1000 Friends of Oregon v. Linn County

306 Or. App. 432 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 10, 2020

Sky Lakes Medical Center, Inc. v. … See Nicita v.

D. R. Johnson Lumber Co. v. State Accident Insurance Fund

20 Or. App. 419 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 18, 1975

In Keefer v. State Ind. Acc. … aggravation must be made to the board in accordance with ORS 656.283.”

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. McCullough

80 Or. App. 98 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 18, 1986

See Bales v. SAIF, 294 Or 224 , 656 P2d 300 (1982); Clayton v. Compensation Department, 253 Or 397 , 454 P2d 628 (1969). … The Board’s ruling concluding that the attack was compensable is based on the same reasoning, in spite of the fact that the Board expressly concluded that the medical opinions were in equipoise.

Schaffer v. SAIF Corp. (In re Schaffer)

291 Or. App. 249 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 4, 2018

Brown v. SAIF , 361 Or. 241 , 391 P.3d 773 (2017) ; Garcia-Solis v. Farmers Ins. Co. , 288 Or. App. 1 , 403 P.3d 803 (2017).

Steiner v. State Accident Insurance Fund

34 Or. App. 317 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 8, 1978

The Workers’ Compensation Board reversed the referee. The circuit court reversed the Board. … See Swanson v. Westport Lumber Co., 4 Or App 417, 479 P2d 1005 (1971). We are not persuaded by claimant’s testimony, and conclude that he has failed to carry his burden of proof.

State v. Miller

53 Or. App. 493 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 10, 1981

State v. Freeman, 232 Or 267, 272 , 374 P2d 453 (1962); State v. McDonald, 231 Or 24, 46 , 361 P2d 1001 (1962). … On the booking sheet that the officer himself signed, the color of his hair is pictured as reddish brown or sandy brown. Mr. Miller’s hair is blond.

Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.

103 Or. App. 508 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 3, 1990

This case is on remand from the Supreme Court, Garcia v. … In our first opinion we erroneously substituted our judgment for that of the Board. Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp., 94 Or App 362 , 765 P2d 1245 (1988). We now affirm the referee’s order.

Crawford & Co. v. Liberty Northwest Insurance

126 Or. App. 110 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 19, 1994

PER CURIAM Petitioners move for reconsideration of our opinion, 124 Or App 210 , 859 P2d 1202 , affirming an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board on the basis of our holding in SAIF v. … SAIF v. Drews, 318 Or 1 , 860 P2d 254 (1993). In view of the Supreme Court’s decision, we allow reconsideration, withdraw our opinion and reverse and remand to the Board for reconsideration under the proper standard.

State v. Morgan

124 Or. App. 229 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 3, 1993

See, e.g., State v. Woods, 121 Or App 661 , 856 P2d 321 (1993); State v. Cavota, 121 Or App 598 , 856 P2d 322 (1993). … ORAP 5.45(2); State v. Farmer, 317 Or 220 , 856 P2d 623 (1993); State v. Castrejon, 317 Or 202 , 856 P2d 616 (1993); State v. Brown, 310 Or 347 , 800 P2d 259 (1990).

Goodman v. SAIF Corp. (In re Goodman)

294 Or. App. 297 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 3, 2018

Brown v. SAIF , 361 Or. 241 , 391 P.3d 773 (2017).

Jewel School Dist. v. KC

349 Or. App. 657 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 20, 2026

Cite as 349 Or App 657 (2026) 659 v. State Board of Forestry, 302 Or 404, 407-09, 730 P2d 1214 (1986) (describing the statutory scheme). … Hinkley v.

State v. Nelson

76 Or. App. 67 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 30, 1985

Defendant handed it to him, and he discovered a package containing a brown lumpy substance, which he suspected was cocaine or heroin. Next, the officer asked for defendant’s driver’s license. … See State v. Bennett, 72 Or App 733 , 697 P2d 213 , (1985); State v. Martin, 71 Or App 1 , 691 P2d 154 (1984); State v. Kirsch, 69 Or App 418 , 686 P2d 446 , rev den 298 Or 151 (1984).

Sorenson v. LaTour

217 Or. App. 373 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2007

The rule guides the board in the implementation of ORS 656.029(1). Indeed, in Clausing v. … In Woody v.

State v. Gherasim

153 Or. App. 313 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 1, 1998

See State v. … State v.

Compensation of Sandstrum v. State Accident Insurance Fund

46 Or. App. 773 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 23, 1980

Claimant appeals from that portion of an order by the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) affirming the referee’s order and ruling that SAIF did not act unreasonably in withholding the benefits, and thus that claimant was … Norgard v. Rawlinsons, 30 Or App 999, 1003 , 569 P2d 49 (1977).

Rhoades v. Sandy Rural Fire Protection District 72

169 Or. App. 329 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 9, 2000

Because claimant had not established good cause for his late filing, the Board dismissed his request for a hearing. In Ogden Aviation v. … Relying on Voorheis v.

Central Catholic Education Ass'n v. Archdiocese of Portland

133 Or. App. 280 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 8, 1995

See Teamsters Local 670 v. … The United States Supreme Court held in NLRB v.

Oliver v. SAIF Corp.

82 Or. App. 270 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 12, 1986

We reverse the Board and reinstate the referee’s order. … Subsequently, the Board and we upheld the compensability of the “anxiety stress reaction.” Oliver v. SAIF, 66 Or App 972 , 675 P2d 620 (1984).

Monroe v. City of Corvallis

347 Or. App. 70 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 11, 2026

We cite to the current versions. 74 Monroe v. … See Alfieri v.