The opinion
PER CURIAM
Petitioners move for reconsideration of our opinion, 124 Or App 210 , 859 P2d 1202 , affirming an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board on the basis of our holding in SAIF v. Drews, 117 Or App 596 , 845 P2d 215 (1993). Drews held that, in cases involving successive injuries, the employer with the last accepted claim need only prove that a new industrial injury involving the same condition materially contributed to claimant’s condition, in order to shift responsibility to a subsequent employer under ORS 656.308(1). However, the Supreme Court subsequently reversed our decision in Drews and held that the employer with the last accepted claim must prove that the new injury at a subsequent employer is the major contributing cause of the need for treatment in order to shift responsibility to the later employer. SAIF v. Drews, 318 Or 1 , 860 P2d 254 (1993). In view of the Supreme Court’s decision, we allow reconsideration, withdraw our opinion and reverse and remand to the Board for reconsideration under the proper standard.
Reconsideration allowed; opinion withdrawn; reversed and remanded for reconsideration.