Case law

State v. Scott

121 Or. App. 308 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 23, 1993

In State v. … Brown, 297 Or. 404 , 687 P.2d 751 (1984).

State v. Montgomery

106 Or. App. 150 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 27, 1991

ORAP 5.45(2); State v. Brown, 310 Or 347 , 800 P2d 259 (1990); State v. Wills, 93 Or App 322, 323 , 761 P2d 1365 (1988), rev den 307 Or 611 (1989); State v. Braughton, 28 Or App 891, 893 , 561 P2d 1040 (1977). … See State v. Gammond, supra. That error is apparent on the face of the record and needs to be corrected. State v. Brown, supra. The state agrees that, if we reach the issue, the case should be remanded for resentencing.

State v. Stafford

184 Or. App. 674 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 6, 2002

State v. Dixon / Digby, 307 Or 195, 211-12 , 766 P2d 1015 (1988). … State v. Gabbard, 129 Or App 122, 126-27 , 877 P2d 1217 , rev den, 320 Or 131 (1994) (citing State v. Ohling, 70 Or App 249 , 688 P2d 1384 , rev den, 298 Or 334 (1989)).

State v. Walter

36 Or. App. 303 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 18, 1978

Defendant relies on Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … We recently applied the Brown holding in State v.

Taylor v. SAIF

329 Or. App. 135 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 15, 2023

See Dotson v. … See OEA v.

State v. HARBICK

234 Or. App. 699 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 14, 2010

State v. … State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). Even if the error is plain, this court must affirmatively exercise its discretion to correct the error. See State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. S.

McGuire v. SAIF

317 Or. App. 629 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 16, 2022

That grant of authority extends to the rules of practice and pro- cedure that the board has articulated by order. See Booth v. … State v. Teixeira, 259 Or App 184, 190, 313 P3d 351 (2013).

State v. Kurokawa-Lasciak

237 Or. App. 492 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 29, 2010

In the years since Brown and Kock , however, the courts have “refined the automobile exception analysis,” Coleman, 167 Or App at 92 , although “refined” is not universally accepted as the proper verb. See State v. … State v.

State v. Fox

313 Or. App. 317 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 14, 2021

Although Brown testified that Blue Cross paid for M’s ambu- lance flight, facility charges, and a follow-up appointment, Brown did not provide a breakdown of the cost of each ser- vice. … See State v.

State v. Osborne

82 Or. App. 229 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 12, 1986

Brown testified that Saunders asked him to help him commit the murder and burn the house. … United States v. Perez, 658 F2d 654 (9th Cir 1981). Here, Saunders’ statement soliciting Brown’s help contained neither assertions nor recollections of past facts. It also did not misrepresent defendant’s involvement.

State v. Mott

315 Or. App. 702 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 17, 2021

See State v. … .”); State v. Brown, 300 Or App 192, 200, 452 P3d 482 (2019), rev’d on other grounds, 704 State v.

State v. Warner

117 Or. App. 420 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 30, 1992

State v. Brown, 301 Or 268 , 721 P2d 1357 (1986). The trial court agreed that that exception permitted the search and denied the motion to suppress. … State v. Brown, supra, 301 Or at 273 .

McCoin v. PSRB

310 Or. App. 534 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 7, 2021

See Einstein v. PSRB, 330 Or 121, 131, 998 P2d 654 (2000) (Van Hoomissen, J., concurring) (“[The board] is entitled to find that petitioner’s evidence is unper- suasive. … Rolfe v. Psychiatric Security Review Board, 53 Or App 941, 947, 633 P2d 846, rev den, 292 Or 334 (1981).

Waveseer of Oregon, LLC v. Deschutes County

308 Or. App. 494 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 13, 2021

Nehmzow v. Deschutes County, 308 Or App 533, 479 P3d 340 (2021). 498 Waveseer of Oregon, LLC v. … Jones v. Willamette United Football Club, 307 Or App 502, 514, 479 P3d 326 (2020). 502 Waveseer of Oregon, LLC v.

State v. Stevens

147 Or. App. 592 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 30, 1997

In determining whether BWS was properly admitted, we evaluate the evidence using the factors set forth in State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984). See State v. … Milbradt, 305 Or 621, 631 , 756 P2d 620 (1988) (suggesting that the Brown test should be used to evaluate “syndromes”); see also State v. St.

Anderson and Abbett

345 Or. App. 664 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 17, 2025

Brown, 259 Or App at 627. … See State v.

State v. Lyons

124 Or. App. 598 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 17, 1993

In Brown , the Supreme Court examined the peak of tension test for general acceptance within the field of polygraphy. State v. Brown, 297 Or at 422-25 . … See State v. Brown, supra, 297 Or at 427 .

Portland Ass'n of Teachers v. Portland School District No. 1

51 Or. App. 321 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 23, 1981

No. 17 of Sherman County v. Powell 203 Or 168 , 279 P2d 492 (1955); Holman Transfer Co. v. City of Portland, 196 Or 551 , 249 P2d 175 (1952). … Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Co., supra; Corvallis Sch. Dist v. Corvallis Education Assn., supra; Portland Teachers v. School District, supra.

Miller v. Elisea

302 Or. App. 188 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 12, 2020

Marcum v. Adventist Health System/West, 345 Or 237, 240, 193 P3d 1 (2008). Defendant did not dispute the professional qualifications of Brown and Freeman or the diagnosis of fibromyalgia. … The court described the considerations relevant to the admissibility of scientific evidence under OEC 401, 702, and 403, State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 687 P2d 751 (1984), and State v.

NAES Corp. v. SCI 3.2, Inc.

303 Or. App. 684 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 29, 2020

See also King v. … See, e.g., SAIF v.