Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,782 results
1.39s
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 30, 2022
See also Moore v. … See McDowell v. Zavaras, 417 F. App’x 755, 756–57 (10th Cir. 2011) (unpublished) (explaining that a habeas petition “denied as time-barred” is “a dismissal . . . on the merits”) (citing cases); Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownKopaddy v. Pottawatomie County Public Safety Center
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 25, 2025
Brown v. Buhman, 822 F.3d 1151, 1161 n.9 (10th Cir. 2016). … Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 149 n.3 (1984).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 17, 2025
The Board filed a Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 10) on June 13, 2025, arguing that (1) 1 Compl. (Dkt. 1, Ex. 2), at 2. … Further, the Court GRANTS the Board’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 10) WITHOUT PREJUDICE and DISMISSES Defendant Del City Police Department from this action WITH PREJUDICE.
Cited 0 timesUnknownFranke v. Midwestern Oklahoma Development Authority
428 F. Supp. 719 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1976
Bumgarner v. Joe Brown Company, 376 F.2d 749 (10th Cir. 1967). As stated by the United States Supreme Court in Blue Chip Stamps v. … In SEC v.
Vacated on other grounds by a later decision, 619 F.2d 856 (1980)Cited 52 timesPublishedJoe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Edsel’s Club, LLC d/b/a Edsel’s Club et al.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 30, 2026
See 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(C)(ii); Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Brown, No. CIV-21-956-G, 2023 WL 6301659, at *3 (W.D. Okla. Sept. 27, 2023). … Oct. 18, 2017); accord Brown, 2023 WL 6301659, at *3.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJerry Venable Revocable Family Trust v. Chesapeake Operating LLC
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 21, 2020
A court, therefore, must consider the equities not 1 Brown v. Baeke, 413 F.3d 1121, 1123 (10th Cir. 2005) (quoting Phillips USA, Inc. v. … Nichols v. Chesapeake Operating, LLC et al. to 4 Ohlander v. Larson, 114 F.3d 1531, 1537 (10th Cir. 1997) (citations omitted). 5 Brown, 413 F.3d at 1124 (citing Am.
Cited 0 timesUnknownNichols v. Chesapeake Operating LLC
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 21, 2020
A court, therefore, must consider the equities not 1 Brown v. Baeke, 413 F.3d 1121, 1123 (10th Cir. 2005) (quoting Phillips USA, Inc. v. … Larson, 114 F.3d 1531, 1537 (10th Cir. 1997) (citations omitted). 5 Brown, 413 F.3d at 1124 (citing Am.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 22, 2024
Yang v. Archuleta, 525 F.3d 925, 928 (10th Cir. 2008) (quoting Brown v. Barrow, 512 F.3d 1304, 1307 (11th Cir. 2008)). “Simple excusable neglect is not sufficient.” Gibson v. … App’x 755, 756-57 (10th Cir. 2011) (unpublished) (explaining that a habeas petition “denied as time-barred” is “‘a dismissal on the merits’) (citing cases); Brown v. Roberts, 177 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 13, 2026
Respondents conceded that Santillan “Quiroz v. … Alvarez v. Smith, 558 U.S. 87, 92 (2009) (quoting Preiser v. Newkirk, 422 U.S. 395, 401 (1975)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 28, 2025
Brown v. City of Tulsa, 124 F.4th 1251, 1263 (10th Cir. 2025). IV. Discussion A. … See State v. U.S. Env’t Prot. Agency, 989 F.3d 874, 885 (10th Cir. 2021) (“[C]ourts do not sit as self-directed boards of legal inquiry and research.” (quoting Nat’l Aeronautics & Space Admin. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownKnight v. Oklahoma City City of
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 30, 2025
Bolden v. City of Topeka, 441 F.3d 1129, 1137 (10th Cir. 2006) (citing Jett v. Dall. Indep. Sch. Dist., 491 U.S. 701 (1989)); accord Brown v. Keystone Learning Servs., 804 F. … Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 568 (1968), and Garcetti, 547 U.S. at 417—the Supreme Court has articulated five factors to be considered in analyzing public-employee free-speech cases.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 11, 2026
See, e.g., Brown v. City of Tulsa, 124 F.4th 1251, 1263 (10th Cir. 2025). III. … Board of Regents, 2002 OK CIV APP 84, ¶ 9, 55 P.3d 567, 570 (the case does not exist and citations are not related to the GTCA).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 30, 2026
is permitted to seek review of such order by the Board of Immigration Appeals”). … Soberanes v. Comfort, 388 F.3d 1305, 1310 (10th Cir. 2004) (citing Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 687-88 (2001)). IV. Under Santillan Quiroz v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown606 F. Supp. 728 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1985
State Board, of Property & Casualty Rates, 637 P.2d 1251 (Okla.1981), on which this Court relied in finding that the policy prohibition against stacking in Duckett’s policy was unenforceable. Duckett , at 728. … E.g., Londrigan v. FBI, 216 U.S.App.D.C. 345 , 670 F.2d 1164 , 1171 n. 37 (1981); United States v. Perry, 431 F.2d 1020, 1022 (9th Cir.1970); Chenette v.
Cited 9 timesPublished788 F. Supp. 531 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1991
See Tenneco Oil Co. v. Allen, 515 P.2d 1391 ; Duncan v. Flagler, 132 P.2d 939, 940-41 ; Oklahoma City v. Tyetenicz, 175 Okla. 228 , 52 P.2d 849, 853 (1935). … See Smith v. Westinghouse Corp., 732 P.2d at 468-70 . See also Riley v. Brown & Root, Inc., 896 F.2d 474, 477 (10th Cir.1990).
Cited 6 timesPublishedKoch Industries, Inc. v. Haxton
414 F. Supp. 942 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 6, 1976
See Lone Star Producing Company v. Jury, 445 P.2d 284 (Okl.1968) and Champlin Petroleum Company v. Board of County *944 Commissioners, 526 P.2d 1142 (Okl.1974). … Co., Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Company, 201 F.2d 673 (Tenth Cir. 1953) and Gulf Refining Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished192 F. Supp. 949 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1961
The court also quoted the following from Brown et al. v. … In Chilton v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 29, 2026
alien is permitted to seek review of such order by the Board of Immigration Appeals”). … Van Dinh v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBoulder Building Corporation v. United States
125 F. Supp. 512 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1954
Levitt & Sons, Inc., v. … Hochschild v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedRogers v. Curahealth Oklahoma LLC
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 25, 2023
See DelCostello v. Int'l Bd. of Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151, 159 n. 13 (1983) (“[T]he choice of a limitations period for a federal cause of action is itself a question of federal law.”); Brown v. Hartshorne Pub. Sch. … v. Welton, 49 P.3d 732, 735 (Okla. 2002). Mere insults and indignities do not meet this standard. Eddy v. Brown, 715 P.2d 74, 77 (Okla. 1986).
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna