Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,782 results
1.05s
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2026
See Dutcher v. Matheson, 733 F.3d 980, 988 (10th Cir. 2013). … Co. v. Brown, 107 P.3d 609, 613 (Okla. Civ. App. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted). “A duty to speak may arise from partial disclosure.” Uptegraft v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown640 F. Supp. 1451 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 18, 1986
Order of May 7, 1986, citing Cooper v. California, 386 U.S. 58, 61 , 87 S.Ct. 788, 790 , 17 L.Ed.2d 730 (1967); McNeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668, 674 , 83 S.Ct. 1433, 1437 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963); Anderson v. … Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668, 674 , 83 S.Ct. 1433, 1437 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963) (“It is immaterial whether respondents’ conduct is legal or illegal as a matter of state law.”), citing Monroe v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2026
Co. v. Brown, 107 P.3d 609, 613 (Okla. Civ. App. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted). “A duty to speak may arise from partial disclosure.” Uptegraft v. … See Anderson v. Lehman Bros. Bank, 528 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2026
See Dutcher v. Matheson, 733 F.3d 980, 988 (10th Cir. 2013). … Co. v. Brown, 107 P.3d 609, 613 (Okla. Civ. App. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted). “A duty to speak may arise from partial disclosure.” Uptegraft v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownKelly v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.
281 F. Supp. 2d 1290 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 12, 2003
Co. of N.Y. v. Board of Educ. of Town of Rosedale, 201 Okla. 250 , 204 P.2d 982, 984-85 (1948)). … See Liristis v. American Family Mut. Ins.
Cited 10 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2026
See Dutcher v. Matheson, 733 F.3d 980, 988 (10th Cir. 2013). … Co. v. Brown, 107 P.3d 609, 613 (Okla. Civ. App. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted). “A duty to speak may arise from partial disclosure.” Uptegraft v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 30, 2026
However, on May 15, 2026, Petitioner appealed the removal order to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), and the appeal is currently pending. … V.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 31, 2026
An immigration judge’s decision to detain may be further appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). Id. § 236.1(d)(3). … See Hernandez-Lara v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDays Inns Worldwide v. Mandir, Inc.
393 F. Supp. 2d 1240 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 18, 2005
See Reed v. … See Shree Ganesh, Inc. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 31, 2026
However, on June 24, 2026, Petitioner appealed the removal order to the Board of Immigration Appeals, and the appeal is currently pending. … Soberanes v. Comfort, 388 F.3d 1305, 1310 (10th Cir. 2004) (citing Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 687-88 (2001)). IV.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSimon Enrique Perozo Arevalo v. Warden Diamondback Correctional Facility, et al.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 21, 2026
However, on June 22, 2026, Petitioner appealed the removal order to the Board of Immigration Appeals, and the appeal is currently pending. … See Thomas v. Union Carbide Agric. Prods.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 31, 2024
Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410–12 (1997)). 22 See Tarrant v. Perry, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59758, at *9 (W.D. Okla. … In Barrios v. Haskell Cty. Pub.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 31, 2026
However, Petitioner has until August 14, 2026, to appeal the removal order to the Board of Immigration Appeals. Id. Therefore, the removal order is not yet final under 8 C.F.R. … V.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 20, 2026
Dragomirescu v. U.S. … Petitioner’s appeal before the Board of Immigration Appeals is pending.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 29, 2026
Soberanes v. Comfort, 388 F.3d 1305, 1310 (10th Cir. 2004) (citing Zadvydas v. … Funes v. Francis, 2025 WL 3263896, at *26 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 2025) (first citing United States v. Texas, 599 U.S. 670, 679 (2023); and then citing Garland v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 29, 2026
However, on February 3, 2026, Petitioner appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals, and the appeal is currently pending. Doc. 1-4 at 2. Therefore, the removal order is not yet final under 8 C.F.R. § 1241.1. … V.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 2, 2025
Turner v. Pub. Serv. Co. of Colorado, 563 F.3d 1136, 1149 (10th Cir. 2009) (quotation marks omitted). … Zbylski v. Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist., 154 F. Supp. 3d 1146, 1163 (D. Colo. 2015).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 8, 2026
Petitioner’s appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals is pending, and the removal order is not administratively final. Id.8 See 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(47)(B). … Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 484 (1973).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 8, 2026
Brown v. Baeke, 413 F.3d 1121, 1123 (10th Cir. 2005). District courts generally grant Rule 41(a)(2) dismissals “[a]bsent ‘legal prejudice’ to the defendant.” Ohlander v. … See Clark v. Tansy, 13 F.3d 1407, 1412 (10th Cir. 1993); see also Gallagher v. Shelton, 587 F.3d 1063, 1068 (10th Cir. 2009).
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna