Case law

Rover Pipeline LLC v. Kanzigg

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 30, 2020

(quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir. 1983)). … Shane Grp., Inc., 825 F.3d at 305 (quoting Brown & Williamson, 710 F.2d at 1179).

Allman v. Walmart Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 14, 2019

Allman claims that Walmart disputed whether the doctor who performed the test at Adena Hospital was “board certified.” (Id. 65:6–14.) Mr. Allman insists that his doctor was board certified in sleep medicine. … Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., 879 F.2d 1304, 1312 (6th Cir. 1989) (“[F]ederal courts have generally granted less protection for opposition than for participation in enforcement proceedings.”).

Hill v. Pell

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 22, 2024

Ohio Sept. 27, 2023) (discussing the evolution of the issue and the process for obtaining control numbers). 3 See, e.g., Brown v. … Warden, No. 1:21-cv-482 (Doc. 29, denying motion for control number and noting that “[t]he ODRC has no authority whatsoever to fail to deliver mail from the Court to a litigant”); - Brown v.

Sandman v. Local Union No. 141 Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n

564 F. Supp. 895 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 13, 1982

Mahoney v. Fisher, 277 F.2d 5 (2nd Cir.1960); Singleton v. Abramson, 336 F.Supp. 754 (S.D. New York 1971). … See Ader v. Hughes, 570 F.2d at 308 .

Tareq Jabr v. Dept. of Taxation, et al.

District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 1, 2026

Frengler v. Gen. Motors, 482 F. App’x 975, 976–77 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). … Browning v. Pendelton, 869 F.2d 989, 992 (6th Cir. 1989). While Ohio law determines the statute of limitations, federal law determines the date of accrual. Ruiz-Bueno v. Maxim HealthCare Servs., 659 Fed.

Johnson v. Cool

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 16, 2024

No. 40), the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge hereby ORDERS that mail from this Court addressed to Plaintiff in this case is legal mail under Sallier v. Brooks, 343 F.3d 868, 877 (6th Cir. 2003). … See generally Vinson v. Brown, No. 2:23-cv-80, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4128 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 8, 2024) (discussing “legal mail”).

Internal Revenue Service v. Barnard (In Re Kuppin)

335 B.R. 675 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 20, 2005

On the jurisdictional issues, the Bankruptcy Court relied on Gordon Sel-Way v. … Enochs v. Williams Packing & Nav. Co., 370 U.S. 1, 7 , 82 S.Ct. 1125 , 8 L.Ed.2d 292 (1962). There is, however, an exception to enforcement of the Anti-Injunction Act. In South Carolina v.

Sherwood Sensing Solutions, LLC v. Henny Penny Corporation

District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 20, 2022

The Board determines if the “newly-presented, narrower claims are ‘supported by the patent’s written description’ and ‘unpatentable in the face of the prior art cited in the IPR.’” Nike, Inc. v. … See PPG Indus., Inc. v. Celanese Polymer Specialties Co., 840 F.2d 1565, 1568-69 (Fed. Cir. 1988). Henny Penny thinks IPR should be treated the same way when the Board’s work replaces the district court’s. Doc.

Doe No. 1 v.Bethel Local School District Board of Education

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 3, 2023

Croley v. Bethel Local School District Board of Education, No. 22 CV 279 (Miami Cnty. C.P. Ct. … Croley v. Bethel Local School District Board of Education, No. 22 CV 279 (Miami Cnty. C.P. Ct. July 21, 2022).

Pentco, Inc. v. Moody

474 F. Supp. 1001 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 7, 1978

In United States v. … Thompson is licensed to administer massage and to give instruction in massage by the Ohio State Medical Board. Mr.

DeMarke

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 6, 2026

See Jankovich v. Brown, 886 F.2d 867 (6th Cir. 1989). I. … Rodriquez v. Brown, 865 F.2d 739, 746 (6th Cir. 1989).

Atwood v. UC Health

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 17, 2019

Soon after the -- soon after that the Kentucky board, due to the reciprocity clause in between the two boards, filed suit at the behest of Mr. Deters. … Browning v. Burt, 66 Ohio St. 3d 544, 557, 613 N.E.2d 993, 1003-1004 (Ohio 1993). In addition, the Ohio Supreme Court has explained that punitive damages “are not compensation for injury.

Fowler v. Browning

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 28, 2023

BROWNING, ORDER Defendant. … American Bank v. City of Menasha, 627 F.3d 261, 265 (7th Cir. 2010) (citations omitted).

Crawford

District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 19, 2026

Frengler v. Gen. Motors, 482 F. App’x 975, 976–77 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). II. … Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989, 992 (6th Cir. 1989). That statute of limitations “begins to run when the plaintiff knows or has reason to know of the injury that is the basis of the action.” Scott v.

Marcum v. Montgomery County Childrens Services, CSB

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 5, 2020

Neitzke, 490 U.S. at 327-28; Brown v. Bargery, 207 F.3d 863, 866 (6th Cir. 2000). … Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989, 992 (6th Cir. 1989) (finding that the “[t]he appropriate statute of limitations for 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights actions arising in Ohio” is two years); Collard v.

Hogan v. Cleveland Ave Restaurant, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 20, 2021

MARBLEY v. : : Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. … See Reed v. Cleveland Bd.

Collins v. Ohio House of Representatives

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 25, 2025

Dlott v. … Baker v. Peterson, 67 F. App’x 308, 310 (6th Cir. 2003).

White v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 14, 2021

See Jankovich v. Brown, 886 F.2d 867 (6th Cir. 1989). I. … Rodriquez v. Brown, 865 F.2d 739, 746 (6th Cir. 1989).

Schmitt v. Husted

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 21, 2020

SCHMITT, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:18-cv-966 v. JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. … Rule 59(e) is the proper vehicle for clarifying judgments, see, e.g., Belair v. Lombardi, 151 F.R.D. 698 (M.D. Fla. 1993), and for addressing claims that have not yet been resolved. See C.

NetJets Association of Shared Aircraft Pilots v. NetJets, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 20, 2024

communicate privately with one another (“Message Board”). … See, e.g., Burnham v.