The opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
JESSICA HOGAN AND DEJHA :
VALENTINE, et al., :
:
on behalf of themselves :
and those similarly situated, :
: Case No. 2:15-cv-2883
Plaintiffs, :
: CHIEF JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY
v. :
: Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers
CLEVELAND AVE RESTAURANT, :
INC., et al., :
:
Defendants. :
OPINION & ORDER
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the Court on consideration of appointment of a Special Master.
(ECF Nos. 327, 328). The underlying dispute is a wage-and-hour case pursuant to the Fair Labor
Standards Act (“FLSA”) on behalf of two groups of workers at the Columbus-area strip club called
Sirens that has been pending for over five years. For the reasons that follow, this Court
APPOINTS John C. Camillus as the Special Master and ORDERS a docket entry reflecting this
appointment.
II. BACKGROUND
On July 31, 2020, this Court granted final approval to the Bartenders’ portion of the
settlement. (ECF No. 303). This obligated Defendants to pay the Bartenders by August 14, 2020.
After Defendants failed to do so, Plaintiff proceeded with the default and enforcement procedure
under the Agreement. (Id.). The enforcement procedure includes an option for the Court to appoint
a Special Master to oversee Defendants’ finances and ensure, to the extent possible, payment of
the settlement. On September 29, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement,
which this Court granted. (ECF Nos. 315, 323).
Pursuant to the order, counsel for the settling Plaintiff class and counsel for the settling
Defendants conferred by telephone regarding their respective candidates for Special Master,
without reaching agreement on a candidate or list of candidates to propose jointly. Defendants
submitted the names of three attorneys as its proposed list of candidates for Special Master, i.e.,
Karl Schneider of McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC, Justin Ristau of Bricker & Eckler, and Steven
Miller of Crabbe, Brown & James. (ECF No. 327). The settling plaintiff class submitted the names
of two attorneys as its proposed list of candidates for Special Master, i.e., Alycia Broz of Vorys,
Sater, Seymour and Pease, and John Camillus of the Law Offices of John C. Camillus. (ECF No.
328).
III. LAW & ANALYSIS
The purpose of a special master is “to aid judges in the performance of specific judicial
duties, as they may arise in the progress of a cause.” La Buy v. Howes Leather Co., 352 U.S. 249
(1957). Rule 53 (a)(1)(A) allows courts to appoint a Special Matter to “perform duties consented
to by the parties.”
Here, the parties consented to the appointment of a Special Master upon the happening of
certain contractual breaches, such as missed payments. This case has been pending since 2015. It
has involved extensive discovery and motions, culminating in the June 2020 Settlement Agreement
and the Motion to Enforce the Settlement Agreement. (ECF Nos. 278, 315). This record reveals
the parties’ difficulty to efficiently execute the Settlement Agreement absent intervention, which
further indicates the propriety of appointing a Special Master.
This Court now turns to review the proposed parties’ nominees. Defendants submitted the
names of three attorneys as its proposed list of candidates for Special Master, i.e., Karl Schneider
of McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC, Justin Ristau of Bricker & Eckler, and Steven Miller of
Crabbe, Brown & James. (ECF No. 327). The settling plaintiff class submitted the names of two
attorneys as its proposed list of candidates for Special Master, i.e., Alycia Broz of Vorys, Sater,
Seymour and Pease, and John Camillus of the Law Offices of John C. Camillus. (ECF No. 328).
All five of the nominees are qualified candidates and hold relevant qualifications.
The role of Special Master in this instance is likely to entail performing numerous
functions, calling for the skills of an attorney with extensive litigation experience, including
retaining consulting experts to investigate and trace defendants’ revenue, assets, and expenditures;
making factual determinations and credibility judgments based on the evidence uncovered and any
testimony adduced; applying the law to the facts found; reporting progress and findings to the
Court; and making full use of the processes of the Court and of the legal authority granted by the
Court to secure defendants’ compliance with their obligations under the Settlement. (See ECF Nos.
327, 328).
Consonant with this Court’s legal authority and the parties’ broad consent, this Court finds
it appropriate to appoint a Special Master and APPOINTS Mr. Camillus to serve as Special
Master and notes his breadth of experience in litigating and arbitrating civil matters. The scope of
the appointment will be consistent with the Settlement Terms, namely, “The Special master will
have wide discretion to oversee Defendants Sirens, Francis Sharrak and/or Michael Sharrak’s
income and assets to ensure the required payments are met.” (ECF No. 315 at 6–7). See Reed v.
Cleveland Bd. Of Educ., 607 F.2d 737, 746 (6th Cir. 1979) (explaining the district court’s authority
to appoint “expert advisors or consultants” derives from either Rule 53 or the inherent power of
the court).
As set forth in the Settlement Agreement, Defendants will be responsible for the costs
associated with the Special Master, to be paid separately and in addition to the Settlement Fund.
(ECF No. 315 at 6).
IV. CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth above, this Court APPOINTS John C. Camillus as the Special
Master and ORDERS a docket entry reflecting this appointment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Algenon L. Marbley
ALGENON L. MARBLEY
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DATED: May 20, 2021