Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
5,831 results
1.13s
District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 12, 2024
Courts in this circuit have consistently found that members of professional licensing or disciplinary boards and disciplinary counsel are entitled to quasi-judicial immunity. See, e.g., McQueen v. … Brown, No. 2:11-cv-82, 2011 WL 855128, at *1 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 9, 2011) (Graham, J.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownHarter v. Franklin County Department of Sanitary Engineers
District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 19, 2025
Co. v. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United States, 201 F.2d 819, 822 (6th Cir. 1953). Ms. Harter moves to strike portions of Mr.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 8, 2024
The Court reasoned that even if she had named the Board as a defendant, her “claim would fail because she did not allege that a specific policy, custom, or decision of the Adams County Board of Commissioners caused her … Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 507 Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCarnes v. Ohio Department of Taxation
District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 13, 2022
Frengler v. Gen. Motors, 482 F. App'x 975, 976–77 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). III. … Plaintiff asserted his right to seek review of the Board’s decision in state court. After receiving an adverse order from the Board, he sought review in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas. See Carnes v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 15, 2021
: : HAMILTON COUNTY : BOARD … Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co., 348 F. Supp. 2d 332, 335 (D.N.J. 2004).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 10, 2023
See also Athridge v. … Ethicon Endo-Surgery v. U.S. Surgical, 160 F.R.D. 98, 99 (S.D. Ohio); Lipian v. Univ. of Mich., Civil Action No. 18-13321, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41935, at *21 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 11, 2020) citing First Tennessee Bank v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 25, 2025
Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). Among such essentials are the obligations under Fed. R. Civ. … Smith v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown829 F. Supp. 2d 597 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 8, 2011
He made approximately 160 public posts to other message board users. … In United States v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 20, 2022
Plaintiff alleges that his due process rights were violated in connection with at Rules Infraction Board (RIB) hearing and appeal. (Doc. 1, Complaint at Page 17). … He claims that he unsuccessfully appealed the result of the RIB hearing to defendants Tyra Parker, Brian Baker, and Vencot Brown.
Cited 0 timesUnknownRosenberg v. University of Cincinnati
118 F.R.D. 591 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 11, 1987
See Eisen v. … At the top of this hierarchy is the Board of Trustees (formerly Board of Directors).
Cited 4 timesPublishedJordan v. Global Natural Resources, Inc.
102 F.R.D. 45 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 3, 1984
board of directors. … Global’s annual meeting was held on September 13, 1982 and all but one of the former directors were reelected to the board.
Cited 3 timesPublishedGoggans v. Container Corp. of America
714 F. Supp. 282 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 26, 1989
Paper Board mills (Mill Division), at the time of the sale of such mills to Cincinnati Paper Board Corporation, Chattanooga Paper Board Corporation, and Chicago Paper Board Corporation on August 20, 1984, who were terminated … Cowden v. Montgomery Co. Soc. For Cancer Control, 591 F.Supp. 740 (S.D.Ohio 1984), supra; Plazzo v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 697 F.Supp. 1437 (N.D.Ohio 1988). See also Laborers’ Pension Trust Fund, Et al. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKuper v. Quantum Chemicals Corp.
852 F. Supp. 1389 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 24, 1994
The Board of Directors also appointed separate trustees for the ESOP component of the Plan. (Doc. 74, p. 9, ¶¶ 16, 20-21). 10. … Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc., 974 F.2d 270, 279 (2d Cir.1992) (citing Whitfield v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedJames v. Upper Arlington City School District
987 F. Supp. 1017 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 15, 1997
Plaintiffs filed their complaint against the Upper Arlington School District and the Board of Education, along with its superintendent and board members, primarily as an appeal of the administrative decisions. … Plaintiffs named as Defendants Upper Arlington City School District; Upper Arlington City Board of Education, and, in their official, representative capacity, William Schaeffer, Superintendent; Linda Ready, School Board President
Cited 7 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 4, 2025
/d.; accord: Montell v. … v. Nassar, 570 U.S. 338 (2013).
Cited 0 timesUnknownB-T Dissolution, Inc. v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
175 F. Supp. 2d 978 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 4, 2001
In other words, it is immaterial whether B-T’s Board, in the exercise of its discretion, elected to treat the premium payments as compensation to Matthews, or whether Revenue Rule 91-26 compelled the Board to do so. … Johnson v. Watts Regulator Co., 63 F.3d 1129, 1133 (1st Cir.1995) (citing Hansen v. Continental Ins. Co., 940 F.2d 971, 976 (5th Cir.1991)); see also Gaylor v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins.
Cited 8 timesPublished547 F. Supp. 2d 807 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 3, 2008
Plaintiff, in her complaint, alleges that the Administrative Review Board of the U.S. … (Board) to review the decision and order.” 1 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Maxwell
341 F. Supp. 2d 941 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 20, 2004
On July 20, 1999, during a regularly scheduled board meeting, Twomley informed Worthington’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the ongoing discussions with Kellogg. … Anderson v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 22, 2023
; and John Does, unknown Parole Board members and other officials. … Code § 2305.10, which requires that all actions for bodily injury be filed within two years after their accrual,” Browning v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCharvat v. Echostar Satellite, LLC
269 F.R.D. 654 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 31, 2010
Meyer Goldberg, Inc., of Lorain v. Fisher Foods, Inc., 823 F.2d 159, 162 (6th Cir.1987), quoting American Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Grady, 594 F.2d 594 , 596 (7th Cir.1978). … The legitimate purpose, as the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals held in Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna