Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohnd

4,048 results

4.91s

  • Dreyer v. United States

    349 F. Supp. 296 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 5, 1972

    Ingham v. Eastern Airlines, 373 F.2d 227 (C.A.2, 1967); Harris v. United States, 333 F.Supp. 870 (N.D.Tex., 1971); Wasilko v. United States, 300 F.Supp. 573 (N.D. Ohio, 1967), aff’d. 412 F.2d 859 (C.A.6, 1969). … As was held in Hartz v. United States, supra, 387 F.2d at 874, the PAR Controller must follow the Manual. It is the “Bible for Tower Operators.” United States v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Rodriquez v. Williams

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 18, 2020

    Urbina v. Thoms, 270 F.3d 292, 295 (6th Cir. 2001). … This standard is satisfied where “there is any evidence in the record that could support the conclusion reached by the disciplinary board.” Id.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Oslavic

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 19, 2026

    As such, courts “shall not ‘accept post hoc rationalizations for agency action in lieu of [accurate] reasons and findings enunciated by the Board.’” Keeton v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 583 F. … (Id. at 635-39 (citing SSR 16-3p, 2017 WL 5180304, at *8; 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1529(c)(3)(iv)-(v), 416.929(c)(3)(iv)-(v)).)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Alghusain v. Nemeth

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 7, 2021

    Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir.1989), abrogated on other grounds, Moore v. City of Harriman, 272 F.3d 769, 772 (6th Cir. 2001) (en banc). … Plaintiff also states that the Commission “cleared [Gupta] from these charges because [Gupta] is a good friend of the Ohio Ethics Commission Board.” (Id. at 61).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Grillo v. Compass Health Brands Corp.

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 25, 2024

    Shane Grp., Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, 825 F.3d 299, 305 (6th Cir. 2016) (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1179 (6th Cir. 1983)). … Ohio Oct. 17, 2023); Polch v. Paul F. Vanek, Jr. M.D., Inc., 2020 WL 6383186 at * 1 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 30, 2020) (Barker, J.); Camp v. Marquee Constr., Inc., 2020 WL 59517 at *1 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 6, 2020); Smolinski v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bleam, Jr. v. Fritz

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 27, 2022

    Ashcroft v. … Comm'rs of Bryan Cnty., Okla. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997)). Private entities that contract to perform traditional state functions on behalf of a governmental entity also may be sued under § 1983. Johnson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Quinn v. Retort

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 28, 2020

    The Rules Infraction Board (“RIB”) later found Plaintiff guilty of all rule violations in this incident. See ECF No. 54- 6. … Brown v. VHS of Mich., Inc., 545 Fed.Appx. 368, 372 (6th Cir. 2013) (citing Hicks v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Orr v. Davis

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 15, 2025

    Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S (1989); Lawler v. Marshall, 898 F.2d 1196 (6th Cir. 1990); Sistrunk v. City of Strongsville, 99 F.3d 194, 197 (6th Cir. 1996). … Bibbo v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Depew v. Stolarsky

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 27, 2023

    In Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989 (6th Cir. 1989), the Sixth Circuit held that the “limitations period for § 1983 actions arising in Ohio is the two-year period in Ohio Revised Code (“O.R.C.”) § 2305.10.” Id. … Since Browning, it is well-settled that, in Ohio, O.R.C. § 2305.10 is the appropriate statute of limitations in § 1983 cases. See LRL Props. v. Portage Metro Hous.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bongiorno

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 10, 2023

    Kirilenko-Ison v. Board of Educ. of Danville Indep. Schs., 974 F.3d 652, 660 (6th Cir. 2020) (citing Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986)). … Street v. J.C. Bradford & Co., 886 F.2d 1472, 1479–80 & n.12 (6th Cir. 1989); Chappell v. City of Cleveland, 584 F. Supp. 2d 974, 988 (N.D. Ohio 2008).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rice v. Governing Authority of the Bio-Med Science Academy

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 20, 2023

    Corp. v. Criss for Estate of Szuhay, 716 F. App’x 530, 533 (6th Cir. 2017) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 127 S. Ct. 1955, 167 L. Ed. 2d 929 (2007); Ashcroft v. … See Lynch v. Leis, 382 F.3d 642, 647 n.5 (6th Cir. 2004) (citing Lyons v. Stovall, 188 F.3d 327, 332 n.3 (6th Cir. 1999)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bentz v. Wainwright

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 7, 2022

    [v]irtually every act or omission of counsel would meet that test”); see also Buell v. … United States v. Joseph, 781 F.2d 549, 552 (6th Cir. 1986) (citation omitted); see Brown v. Pitcher, 19 F. App’x 154, 157 (6th Cir. 2001) (applying the presumption in habeas proceedings) (citations omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Nagy v. State of Ohio

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 5, 2021

    David Yost, Ohio Attorney General,” the Cuyahoga County Board of Developmental Disability “ex rel. Jerry Cannon, Forensic Auditor,” and her criminal defense lawyer Michael Mahoney. (Doc. No. 1.) … See State v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kovacs v. University of Toledo

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 17, 2024

    Smith v. Hudson, 600 F.2d 60, 62 (6th Cir. 1979). … See E.E.O.C. v. Ford Motor Co., 98 F.3d 1341 (6th Cir. 1996) (unpublished).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Culver v. Churchill

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 1, 2024

    Fritz v. Charter Twp. of Comstock, 592 F.3d 718, 722 (6th Cir. 2010) (quoting Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)). … This is because “a permissive amendment policy applied after adverse judgments [would allow plaintiffs to] use the court as a sounding board to discover holes in their arguments, then ‘reopen the case by amending their

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • GlobalTranz Enterprises LLC v. State to State Freight, LLC

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 27, 2021

    Caffey v. Unum Life Ins. … . § 1961(a) further dictates that, “[s]uch interest shall be calculated from the date of the entry of the judgment at a rate equal to the weekly average 1-year constant maturity Treasury yield, as published by the Board

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cooks v. Ford Motor Company

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 31, 2023

    LEXIS 30418, at *19 (citing Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., Inc., 879 F.2d 1304, 1313 (6th Cir. 1989)). … Id.; see also Brown v. O’Reilly Auto. Stores, Inc., 2015-Ohio-5146, ¶ 32 (Ohio Ct. App.) (“Vague charges of discrimination do not invoke the protection of the law.”).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Goolsby v. Best in Neighborhood LLC

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 24, 2021

    Best Home, LLC and Brown CRE were also originally defendants to this case, but were previously dismissed without prejudice. See Doc. 16. … Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • A.B. Pratt & Co v. Bridgeport Group, LLC

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 10, 2023

    Malone v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., 965 F.3d 499, 501 (6th Cir. 2020) (citing Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)). … Id. ¶ 14 (citing Brown & Brown, Inc. v. Mudron, 379 Ill.App.3d 724, 728–29, 320 Ill.Dec. 293, 887 N.E.2d 437 (2008)); see also Millard, 207 Ill.App.3d at 744, 152 Ill.Dec. 692, 566 N.E.2d 379. McInnis v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Carpenter v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 29, 2025

    Key v. Callahan, 109 F.3d 270, 273 (6th Cir. 1997). … See Berkshire v. Beauvais, 928 F.3d 520, 530–531 (6th

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.