Case law

Complaint of the Bethlehem Steel Corp.

449 F. Supp. 681 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 20, 1977

Smith v. Condry, 1 How. 28, 33 , 11 L.Ed. 35 ; Slater v. Mexican National R. Co., 194 U.S. 120 , 24 S.Ct. 581 , 48 L.Ed. 900 ; Cuba R. Co. v. … Crosby, 222 U.S. 473 , 32 S.Ct. 132 , 56 L.Ed. 274 , 38 L.R.A.,N.S., 40; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Brown, 234 U.S. 542 , 34 S.Ct. 955 , 58 L.Ed. 1457 .

INTERNATIONAL ASS'N OF M. & AW v. Garwood Indus., Inc.

368 F. Supp. 357 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 13, 1973

See, e. g., International Union v. Textron, Inc., 312 F.2d 688 (6th Cir. 1963); Knoll v. Phoenix Steel Corp., 325 F. … V: "The Company reserves the right to amend, modify or terminate the Plan by action of its Board of Directors, provided, however, that no such action shall alter the Plan or its operation (except as may be required by the

Perlmuter Printing Co. v. Strome, Inc.

436 F. Supp. 409 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 23, 1976

Robnolte v. Kohart, 81 Ohio App. 1 , 76 N.E.2d 913, 915 (1947). See also, Burns Bros. Plumbers, Inc. v. Groves Ventures Co., 412 F.2d 202 (6th Cir. 1969). … See Cohn v. Fisher, 118 N.J.Super. 286 , 287 A.2d 222 (1972).

Chavez

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 20, 2025

See Demore v. … V.

Liberty Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 1, 2023

Plaintiffs’ analysis far exceeds that provided in Williams v. Shelby County Board of Education, No. 2:17-cv- 2050, 2022 WL 331012 (W.D. Tenn. Feb. 3, 2022), which Defendant cites. … Swint v. Chambers Cnty. Comm’n, 514 U.S. 35, 36 (1995). Certification under that statute is granted sparingly and only in exceptional cases. Kraus v. Board of Cnty. Rd.

Rutledge v. c/o Elson

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 5, 2020

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). … See Brown v. Imboden, No. 1:11 CV 529, 2011 WL 3704952, at *2 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 23, 2011) (Mansfield Correctional Institution is not a legal entity capable of being sued or of bringing suit) (collecting cases).

Easter v. Jeep Corp.

538 F. Supp. 515 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 25, 1982

Reid v. Memphis Publishing Co., 521 F.2d 512, 514 (6th Cir. 1975); Weiner v. Oakland, 14 FEP 380, 382 (E.D.Mich.1976)). EEOC v. … The determination of attorney’s fees in such eases as this is governed by Northcross v. Board of Education of the Memphis City Schools, 611 F.2d 624 (6th Cir. 1979).

Henson, Sr. v. Lucas County Sheriff's Office

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 10, 2025

Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). The Court is not required to “conjure up unpleaded facts” or construct claims against defendants on behalf of a pro se plaintiff. Grinter v. … United States v. Sharp, 689 F.3d 616, 618 (6th Cir. 2012); Nykoriak v. Wileczek, 666 F.

Bench Billboard Co. v. City of Toledo

759 F. Supp. 2d 905 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 15, 2010

Webb v. Board of Education of Dyer County, Tenn., 471 U.S. at 243, 105 S.Ct. 1923 , 85 L.Ed.2d 233 (1985). It is within the discretion of the district court to decide whether ancillary fees are appropriate. … .”); Diffenderfer v.

Drayton v. Jiffee Chemical Corp.

413 F. Supp. 834 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 12, 1976

Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 , 58 S.Ct. 817 , 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938). … Also significant is defendant’s construction of Gossett v. Chrysler Corp., 359 F.2d 84 (6th Cir. 1966).

Wallace

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 20, 2026

Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). … Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371 (1976); Mullins v. Hainesworth, 1995 WL 559381 (6th Cir.).

Kilnapp v. City of Cleveland

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 13, 2025

In the early morning hours of July 20, 2020, Plaintiff and Defendant responded to a call from dispatch that a female reported a man had shot a hole into the floorboards in a boarding house. … Keeping in mind that the boarding house was completely dark except for the officers’ flashlights, Plaintiff is compelled to admit that she never saw the suspect (ECF DKT #60-1 at 59) nor the inside of the bathroom (ECF DKT

Stancik v. CNBC

420 F. Supp. 2d 800 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 9, 2006

This amended pleading adds CNBC Board Members Jack Welch, Jeffrey Immelt, Robert Wright, Pamela Thompson-Graham and Mark Hoffman as party defendants. Mr. … Morgan v. Church’s Fried Chicken, 829 F.2d 10, 12 (6th Cir.1987); see Place v.

Midwest Retailer Associated, Ltd. v. City of Toledo

563 F. Supp. 2d 796 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 30, 2008

See, e.g., G & V Lounge, Inc. v. Mich. … See Brown v. Legal Found. of Wash., 538 U.S. 216, 233-34 , 123 S.Ct. 1406 , 155 L.Ed.2d 376 (2003).

Byerly v. DeWeese

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 13, 2019

E.g., Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 9 (1991); Barnes v. Winchell, 105 F.3d 1111, 1115 (6th Cir. 1997). … See Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 275-276 (1985) (holding that federal courts must apply the state statute of limitations for personal injury actions to § 1983 claims); Browning v.

Reese v. Southwest General Hospital

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 27, 2020

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Winget, 510 F.3d 577, 582 (6th Cir. 2007) (quoting Paskvan v. City of Cleveland Civil Serv. … Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 152 (1984).

Kourouma

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 10, 2026

Kourouma states that he timely filed an appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), which remains pending. … See Johnson v.

Pipe Welding Supply Co. Inc. v. Gas Atmospheres, Inc.

201 F. Supp. 191 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 28, 1961

(Citing Lee v. Industrial Laundry Machine Co., 261 App.Div. 741 , 27 N.Y.S.2d 202 ; Plimpton v. Brown Bros., 224 N.Y. 724 , 121 N.E. 886 .) See also Broderick Haulage, Inc. v. … In Howard v.

Retirees of the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. Employee Healthcare Trust Committee v. Steely

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 21, 2020

In support of its motion, plaintiff relies upon Daft v. … Wheeler v. Southerland Corp., 875 F.2d 1246, 1251 (6th Cir. 1989) (quotation marks and citation omitted). “This standard is objective[,]” id. (emphasis omitted) (quoting Browning v.

Fleming

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 22, 2026

Pilgrim v. Littlefield, 92 F.3d 413, 416 (6th Cir. 1996). Liberal construction does not “abrogate basic pleading essentials in pro se suits.” Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). … D’Ambrosio v. Marino, 747 F.3d 378, 383 (6th Cir. 2014) (quoting Terry v. Tyson Farms, Inc., 604 F.3d 272, 275-76 (6th Cir. 2010)). And courts need not make unwarranted factual inferences. Kottmyer v.