Case law

White v. Mansfield Correctional Institution

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 18, 2020

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). … See Brown v. Imboden, No. 1:11 CV 529, 2011 WL 3704952, at *2 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 23, 2011) (Mansfield Correctional Institution is not a legal entity capable of being sued or of bringing suit) (collecting cases).

A. W. v. Bay Village City School District of Education

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 22, 2021

Id. at 970-71; see also Crozier v. Westside Cmty. Sch. … Bass v. Leatherwood, 788 F.3d 228, 230 (6th Cir. 2015); see also Grappell v. Carvalho, 847 F.

Howell v. Stark County Community Action Agency

63 F. Supp. 2d 843 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 27, 1999

Brown v. ASD Computing Center, 519 F.Supp. 1096, 1116 (S.D.Ohio, 1981); Harrison v. Metro. … .”); Murray v.

Chukwuani

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 24, 2026

Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 554 U.S. 471, 485 n. 5, 128 S. Ct. 2605, 171 L. Ed. 2d 570 (2008) (quoting 11 WRIGHT & MILLER’S FEDERAL PRACTICE & PROCEDURE § 2810.1 (2d ed. 1995)); Morgan & Morgan v. … Hobbs v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., No. 24-3763, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 28996, at *1 (6th Cir. Nov. 4, 2025) (dismissal of pro se motion to vacate) (quoting Brown v. Local 58, Int’l Bd. Of Elec.

Buntura v. Ford Motor Company

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 17, 2024

“If a permissive amendment policy applied after adverse judgments, plaintiffs could use the court as a sounding board to discover holes in their arguments, then ‘reopen the case by amending their complaint to take account … Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Engler, 146 F.3d 367, 374 (6th Cir. 1998) (quoting Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. World Univ. Inc., 978 F.2d 10, 16 (1st Cir. 1992)).

DeVore v. May

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 24, 2023

See, e.g., Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 463 (1953); Powell v. Collins, 332 F.3d 376, 388 (6th Cir. 2003) (citing Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. 62, 67–68 (1991)); Skaggs v. … Brown v. Konteh, 567 F.3d 191, 205 (6th Cir. 2009). Rather, it is the trier of fact’s responsibility to “decide what conclusions should be drawn from evidence admitted at trial.” Cavazos v.

Johnson v. Chamber-Smith

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 29, 2021

In Wilson v. … See Ctr. for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v.

Bill Call Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.

830 F. Supp. 1034 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 18, 1993

The Board modified the length of the term and the conditions for renewal. … .”); Neel v.

Geneva Life Care Center, LLC v. Geneva Village Retirement Community, Ltd.

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 30, 2024

See Browning v. Levy, 283 F.3d 761, 773 (6th Cir. 2002) (explaining the difference between core and non-core claims). … Bach v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, No. 21-cv-1394, 2023 WL 315684, at *3 (E.D. Wis.

Robinson v. N & C Construction Co.

767 F. Supp. 843 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 16, 1991

Id. at 1257 ; see also Hull v. Cuyahoga Valley Board of Education, 926 F.2d 505, 508-9 (6th Cir.1991). … .’’); Setser v.

Fair Housing Advocates Assn. v. City of Richmond Heights

998 F. Supp. 825 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 24, 1998

It is not the province of a federal court to act as a super-zoning board. Exxon Corp. v. Governor of Maryland, 437 U.S. 117, 124 , 98 S.Ct. 2207 , 57 L.Ed.2d 91 (1978). 11. … Oxford House-C v. City of St. Louis, 77 F.3d 249, 252 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 65 , 136 L.Ed.2d 27 (1996). 16.

Rypiak v. Southwest General Hospital

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 5, 2023

Hill v. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., 879 F.2d 1304, 1313 (6th Cir. 1989) and Fox, 510 F.3d at 592.

In Re Empyrean Bioscience, Inc. Securities Litigation

255 F. Supp. 2d 751 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 26, 2003

It appears from the Complaint that each of the Individual Defendants is or was a member of the board of directors of Empyrean. … See also Novak v.

Porter v. Cuyahoga County

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 17, 2020

Brown Center located on Superior Avene in Cleveland, Ohio. … Co. v. Gen. Motors Corp., 242 F. Supp.2d 736, 739 (E.D. Cal. 2003) (citing Jones v.

Devault v. Wal-Mart, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 23, 2020

(citing Brown v. Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United States, 201 F.3d 819, 822 (6th Cir. 1953)). “However, within this framework, the court retains ‘liberal discretion’ to strike filings as it deems appropriate.” Id. … DeMarco v. DepoTech Corp., 149 F.Supp.2d 1212, 1220 (S.D.Cal.2001) (quoting Rose v. Bartle, 871 F.2d 331, 339 n.3 (3d Cir.1989)); cf United States v.

Pohorecki v. Anthony Wayne Local School District

637 F. Supp. 2d 547 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 23, 2009

Defendant-Appellee is the Board of Education of Anthony Wayne Local School District (the District). … The primary mechanism for delivering a FAPE is an IEP. 20 U.S.C. § 1414 ; Board of Educ. v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 181-82 , 102 S.Ct. 3034 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982).

Prude v. Russell

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 5, 2020

See Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 275–76 (1985) (holding that federal courts must apply the state statute of limitations for personal injury actions to § 1983 claims); Browning v. … Musson Theatrical, Inc. v.

Environmental Law & Policy Center v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 13, 2019

Coal., Inc. v. … (quoting San Francisco BayKeeper v. Whitman, 297 F.3d 877, 881 (9th Cir. 2002)); see also Hayes v. Whitman, 264 F.3d 1017, 1024 (10th Cir. 2001); Scott v.

Foster v. Jeep Country Federal Credit Union

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 23, 2022

Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319 (1989); Lawler v. Marshall, 898 F.2d 1196 (6th Cir. 1990); Sistrunk v. City of Strongsville, 99 F.3d 194, 197 (6th Cir. 1996). … Williams v. Luttrell, 99 F. App’x 705, 707 (6th Cir. 2004) (citing, inter alia, Diamond v. Charles, 476 U.S. 54, 64-65 (1986)); Saro v. Brown, 11 F.

Trewhella v. City of Findlay

592 F. Supp. 2d 998 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 31, 2008

United States v. Brown, 988 F.2d 658, 663 (6th Cir.1993). A. Stipulated Facts The parties filed a Joint Stipulation of Fact (Doc. No. 36) which the Court adopts. A summary of the relevant facts follows. … The City In Monell v.