Case law

Bragg v. Spatny

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 19, 2025

See Brown v. Haviland, 23 F. App’x 244, 245 (6th Cir. 2001) (“a one-year statute of limitations is applicable to § 2254 petitions”) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)). 2. … See Seymour v.

Huffman v. Village of Newburgh Heights

120 F. Supp. 3d 691 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 27, 2015

Smoak v. Hall, 460 F.3d 768, 777 (6th Cir.2006) (citing Waters v. City of Morristown, 242 F.3d 353, 358-59 (6th Cir.2001)). … Are you saying there was a child on board? Dispatcher: Apparently our caller hung up.

White v. City of Cleveland

District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 29, 2020

P’ship I v. Twp. of Liberty, No. 2:04-CV-1069, 2007 WL 1796089, at *3 (S.D. Ohio June 21, 2007) (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir. 1983)). … Detroit Free Press Inc. v.

Irizarry v. East Longitude Trading Co. Ltd.

296 F. Supp. 2d 862 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 24, 2003

substantial forum contact is necessary for this court to exercise general jurisdiction over a defendant. ' Helicópteros involved a helicopter owned by the defendant company, which crashed in Peru, killing four U.S. citizens on board … Ramada Franchise Sys., Inc. v. Hanna Hotel Enters., LLC, 147 F.Supp.2d 840, 844 (N.D.Ohio 2001) (citing Cole v. Mileti, 133 F.3d 433, 436 (6th Cir. 1998)).

Continental Bank v. National City Bank

245 F. Supp. 684 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 15, 1965

v. … Federal Communications Comm. v. WJR, 337 U. S. 265, 275-276 [ 69 S. Ct. 1097 , 93 L. Ed. 1353 ]; Hannah v. Larche, 363 U. S. *103 420, 440, 442 [ 80 S. Ct. 1502 , 4 L. Ed. 2d 1307 ]; Hagar v.

Union Trust Co. v. White Motor Co.

22 F.2d 816 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 7, 1927

These principles were fully stated and dealt with by me in Universal Rim Co. v. Firestone Steel Products Co. (D. C.) 289 F. 884 . … Brown, clearly and conclusively shows many dissimilarities between Exhibits 19 and 20 and Melanowski’s patent drawings, and ma^y similarities with Exhibit 11.

Singletary v. City of Toledo, Ohio

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 2, 2025

See, e.g., Workman v. … necessary first step before the Plan Commission or the Board of Zoning Appeals could consider a special use permit application.

Ja’Nae Laria Johnson v. Liberty Township et al.

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 6, 2026

Brown v. Lewis, 779 F.3d 401, 415 (6th Cir. 2015) (citing Smoak v. Hall, 460 F.3d 768, 781 (6th Cir. 2006)). … In Board of County Commissioners of Bryan County, Okl. v.

Peterson v. Obert

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 17, 2024

Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). The Court is not required to conjure unpleaded facts or construct claims against defendants on behalf of a pro se plaintiff. See Beaudett v. … See Bassett v. Nat’l Collegiate Ath. Ass’n, 528 F.3d 426, 437 (6th Cir. 2008); see also Scheid v.

Sanchez-Garcia

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 13, 2026

See 28 U.S.C. § 2243; Alexander v. N. Bureau of Prisons, 419 F. App’x 544, 545 (6th Cir. 2011). … See Regla-Araujo v. Warden, FCI Elkton, No. 4:25-cv-544, 2025 WL 1532498, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101686, *5 (N.D.

Newton v. Kardashian

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 22, 2024

Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). The Court is not required to conjure unpleaded facts or construct claims against defendants on behalf of a pro se plaintiff. See Bassett v. … Brown, 11 F. App’x 387, 388 (6th Cir. 2001) (citing United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 693 (1974)).

Asphalt Systems, Inc. v. Unique Paving Materials Corp.

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 13, 2024

Defendant Unique argues that the Court should reconsider its decision because the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) granted ex parte reexamination as to claims 1–14 of Plaintiff’s ‘097 patent. … Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936). The Court has broad discretion to stay proceedings. Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 706 (1997). III.

Glasgow v. Beers

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 20, 2024

(citations omitted); Brown v. … (R. 94, PageID# 1662, quoting Brown v. Dayton, 89 Ohio St.3d 245, 248, 730 N.E.2d 958 (Ohio 2000)).

Quintanilla v. AK TUBE LLC

477 F. Supp. 2d 828 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 12, 2007

See Browning v. Rohm & Haas Tennessee, Inc., 16 F.Supp.2d 896, 904 (E.D.Tenn.1998) (where discharged employees were told they would be given priority for rehiring, employer had no duty to rehire them). … See Black v.

Leonard v. Sage Hospitality The Westin Cleveland Downtown Hotel

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 29, 2023

Croskey v. Robinson, 2023 WL 4456817 (N.D. Ohio July 11, 2023) (citing Pilgrim v. Littlefield, 92 F.3d 413, 416 (6th Cir. 1996); Grinter v. Knight, 532 F.3d 567, 577 (6th Cir. 2008); Bassett v. … Middleton v. United Church of Christ Board, 2021 WL 5447040 (6th Cir. Nov. 22, 2021). See also Bryant v.

Old West End Ass'n v. Buckeye Federal Savings & Loan

675 F. Supp. 1100 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 22, 1987

Shaw v. Cassar, 558 F.Supp. 303 (E.D.Mich.1983); See Drain v. Friedman, 422 F.Supp. 366 (N.D.Ohio 1976); United States v. Parma, 494 F.Supp. 1049 (N.D.Ohio) appeal dismissed 633 F.2d 218 (6th Cir.1980); Smith v. … Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens, supra at 714 n. 3, 103 S.Ct. at 1481 n. 3.

Duke's K9 Dash N' Splash, LLC v. Zizka

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 28, 2024

Co. v. … Nonetheless, case law demonstrates that a board of zoning appeals can be sued in at least some contexts. See, e.g., Danis Montco Landfill Co. v. Jefferson Twp. Zoning Comm., 620 N.E.2d 140, 141 (Ohio Ct.

Jewell Coke Co., Lp v. Arcelormittal USA, Inc.

756 F. Supp. 2d 858 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 27, 2010

Remington Rand Corp. v. … Brown v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc., 991 F.2d 1020, 1032 (2d Cir.1993).

Cuno v. DaimlerChrysler, Inc.

154 F. Supp. 2d 1196 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 1, 2001

Counts II and V will be dismissed. V. … See Parella v. Retirement Board of Rhode Island Employees’ Ret.

Bey v. Kenny

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 30, 2024

Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). The Court is not required to conjure unpleaded facts or construct claims against defendants on behalf of a pro se plaintiff. See Beaudett v. … See Bassett v. Nat’l Collegiate Ath. Ass’n, 528 F.3d 426, 437 (6th Cir. 2008); see also Scheid v.